Comments Thread For: Shields-Marshall Promoter: 'From a Financial Perspective It's a Disaster'

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Shields-Marshall Promoter: 'From a Financial Perspective It's a Disaster'

    The postponement of the Sept.10 Claressa Shields-Savannah Marshall card due to the death of Queen Elizabeth II led to steep financial repercussions for its organizers and participants, according to the lead promoter of the event.
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • champion4ever
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2007
    • 23826
    • 4,061
    • 7,086
    • 202,915,785

    #2
    Boxxer and especially Ben Shalom need to quit bellyaching. They know they have promoter's insurance to cover all of the losses and damages that were incurred from the postponement of their event.

    Comment

    • Smash
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Nov 2008
      • 15564
      • 6,387
      • 7,804
      • 21,172

      #3
      some sports have a tribute and some get axed, doesnt make much sense to me

      Comment

      • TheOneAboveAll
        Supreme Arbiter
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jun 2022
        • 2535
        • 1,487
        • 1,628
        • 0

        #4
        Originally posted by champion4ever
        Boxxer and especially Ben Shalom need to quit bellyaching. They know they have promoter's insurance to cover all of the losses and damages that were incurred from the postponement of their event.
        Bellyaching? The article quoted him lamenting the burden put on the fighters and the fans more than anything else.

        Comment

        • Greenfield02
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2018
          • 2126
          • 1,436
          • 134
          • 16,851

          #5
          I agree, there's certainly more important things than boxing or sports in general. That said, but a rich person dying isn't one of them, ( granted the Royals are only rich because of the hard work of tax payers, their basically living of welfare while looking down on those hard working people that support them) people die all the time, while death is sad and hard, it shouldn't be shoved down people's throats. If people want to grieve, they can do it on their of own private time, the whole wall to wall coverage on every channel is ridiculous, for people who do absolutely nothing for it's country or it's people other than take their money and come out on a balcony and waive.....

          Comment

          • champion4ever
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2007
            • 23826
            • 4,061
            • 7,086
            • 202,915,785

            #6
            Originally posted by TheOneAboveAll

            Bellyaching? The article quoted him lamenting the burden put on the fighters and the fans more than anything else.
            My apologies; I stand corrected!

            Comment

            • boxingitis
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Sep 2013
              • 6762
              • 1,936
              • 18
              • 23,227

              #7
              Queen shouldnt matter any more. We are not in the middle ages. Only Queen that matter was Freddy Mercury.

              Comment

              • The D3vil
                WBA/WBC/WBO/IBF/Lineal
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Mar 2016
                • 6256
                • 1,589
                • 1,381
                • 56,286

                #8
                After washing all of this Queen worship the last few days, I don't want to hear about y'all making fun of North Koreans and how they worship the Kims like gods.

                Comment

                • SteveM
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Feb 2015
                  • 8396
                  • 2,341
                  • 1,222
                  • 35,733

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Greenfield02
                  I agree, there's certainly more important things than boxing or sports in general. That said, but a rich person dying isn't one of them, ( granted the Royals are only rich because of the hard work of tax payers, their basically living of welfare while looking down on those hard working people that support them) people die all the time, while death is sad and hard, it shouldn't be shoved down people's throats. If people want to grieve, they can do it on their of own private time, the whole wall to wall coverage on every channel is ridiculous, for people who do absolutely nothing for it's country or it's people other than take their money and come out on a balcony and waive.....
                  I'm not a royalist. At all. But if you are going to comment you might as well do so from an informed point of view. The amount of tax revenue that comes in from tourism inspired by the Royals would go a long way to offset government expenditure on them. But even if you would take an abstract view that the Royal family are entertainers for the serfs, then they are good value for money, as much as any other entertainers anyway.

                  If there is wall to wall coverage shoved down people's throats then that is probably filling a demand - there's always an off button. Nobody forced Boxxer to cancel - their choice, made out of respect.

                  Comment

                  • eco1
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Nov 2015
                    • 10013
                    • 1,735
                    • 8,604
                    • 71,221

                    #10
                    Originally posted by SteveM

                    I'm not a royalist. At all. But if you are going to comment you might as well do so from an informed point of view. The amount of tax revenue that comes in from tourism inspired by the Royals would go a long way to offset government expenditure on them. But even if you would take an abstract view that the Royal family are entertainers for the serfs, then they are good value for money, as much as any other entertainers anyway.

                    If there is wall to wall coverage shoved down people's throats then that is probably filling a demand - there's always an off button. Nobody forced Boxxer to cancel - their choice, made out of respect.
                    Also the diamonds the Queen stole and the people she had killed on countries you have never been to. SO.....

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP