Weight & rehydration clause for Eubank is worse than Rahman Jr's

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • M312
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2021
    • 2601
    • 1,087
    • 279
    • 0

    #21
    Originally posted by War Room

    I agree with a bunch of that, but for where Eubank is in his career, one could make an argument he was forced into it. I don't think Eubank is happy about the hydration clause. Just my opinion.
    Eubank was Skys main attraction. They've spent a fortune marketing him in the past year.

    Hes done their biggest numbers with Boxxer and was lined up as their next Box Office star.

    Bit of a shit move leaving them tbh.

    ​​​​​​He definitely wasn't forced into anything.

    Nobody would be happy about a hydration clause, but he's happy 'enough'. He even mentions in the presser that Benn is moving up two divisions so it's all fair (3min15 of the first video).
    Last edited by M312; 08-13-2022, 06:25 PM.

    Comment

    • QueensburyRules
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2018
      • 22873
      • 2,539
      • 18
      • 187,708

      #22
      Originally posted by War Room
      Eubank is already shriveled at 160 but the rehydration at 168 is pretty slim. He's already at a lower weight, has to cut 3, and extremely limited in his hydration.

      Originally Rahman was contracted at 200 and could be 215 the morning of and whatever by fight night.

      How come nobody is complaining about a real boxer exercising an extreme hydration clause?
      - - Source, preferably respected besides a romper room tirade.

      Comment

      • Larry the boss
        EDUCATED
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jan 2011
        • 90798
        • 6,419
        • 4,473
        • 2,500,480

        #23
        well he agreed to it, cant agree then complain

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP