Comments Thread For: WBA, Mendoza Named As Defendants In Charr's Amended Lawsuit Against Don King

[WBC WBA IBF]

It would be unprofessional to show this supposed contract, but not unprofessional to show a part of it?

Because Hearn was lying so much, yes it was appropriate to reveal a very small and benign portion of the contract. It would have been unprofessional to post the contract in its entirety and expose people's private information and business dealings that weren't relevant to what was being discussed.

[Sid-Knee]

Because Hearn was lying so much, yes it was appropriate to reveal a very small and benign portion of the contract. It would have been unprofessional to post the contract in its entirety and expose people's private information and business dealings that weren't relevant to what was being discussed.

You do talk a load of shlt don't you...

They didn't discuss anything remember? The meetings where cancelled. Nor was there any contract. If there was, Eddie asked him to post it. Espinoza refused.

If it was unprofessional to reveal anything, Espinoza wouldn't have revealed anything. But he did. He also talked about their dealings with AJ/Showtime. But he couldn't show what Eddie was asking him to?

Nothing was private. Nothing. They hadn't even discussed anything properly. What was sent over was nonsense. Eddie exposed them. But now it couldn't be shown because it was supposedly "Unprofessional" and "Private".

Haha, GTFOH.

What was so private that no eyes could possibly see? Where there some magical secrets?

[WBC WBA IBF]

Nor was there any contract.

You're wrong. Wilder's email to Joshua included a four page agreement outlining all of the major deal points, including UK rights. That's where Espinoza's screen shot is from.

[Sid-Knee]

You're wrong. Wilder's email to Joshua included a four page agreement outlining all of the major deal points, including UK rights. That's where Espinoza's screen shot is from.

I'm not wrong. Eddie asked for it to be put up and shown for all to see. Espinoza refused.

But what was so private? What was the secret that no eyes could possibly see?

[WBC WBA IBF]

I'm not wrong. Eddie asked for it to be put up and shown for all to see. Espinoza refused.

Here's the flaw in your position though. Eddie never denied that the screen shot was from the agreement. He simply moved the goal posts and told Espinoza to post the entire agreement, knowing how unethical it would be for him to post the contract in full. It then allows idiots like you to ignore the fact that Hearn was caught lying.

[Sid-Knee]

Here's the flaw in your position though. Eddie never denied that the screen shot was from the agreement. He simply moved the goal posts and told Espinoza to post the entire agreement, knowing how unethical it would be for him to post the contract in full. It then allows idiots like you to ignore the fact that Hearn was caught lying.

What was so private and unethical? The "Contract" was with Eddie supposedly. Well, he wanted Espinoza to post it. He wasn't going against the wishes of the one he was doing business with. It was already contradicted by the fact Espinoza showed a supposed part of this "Contract" and posted comments about AJ/Showtime when Eddie didn't ask him to. But here he was.

Espinoza Just didn't want people seeing the contents and how laughable their requests were.

Sorry, but you're talking nonsense.

[WBC WBA IBF]

What was so private and unethical?

Posting the full four page agreement would be unethical because Wilder, PBC and other partners may not want their personal information or proprietary business information posted on twitter for the world to see. Hearn knows that, so it's a good distraction to fool simple minded people like you. But Hearn didn't deny that the screen shot was real, which proves Hearn was lying and Sky was offered UK rights for the fight.

[Sid-Knee]

Posting the full four page agreement would be unethical because Wilder, PBC and other partners may not want their personal information or proprietary business information posted on twitter for the world to see. Hearn knows that, so it's a good distraction to fool simple minded people like you. But Hearn didn't deny that the screen shot was real, which proves Hearn was lying and Sky was offered UK rights for the fight.

What information from Wilder could be seen?

Oh, and have you heard his latest? He now wants more money than he wanted due to AJ losing. Apparently, you get paid more money if your opponent loses. Wonderful mind the cabbage has. Complete batshlt crazy. But hey, he's done everything he could to duck the fight like every other time.

[WBC WBA IBF]

What information from Wilder could be seen?

We don't know, because he didn't post it. He didn't post it so we wouldn't know. It would be unethical and unprofessional for a TV executive to leak a fighter contract.

[Sid-Knee]

We don't know, because he didn't post it. He didn't post it so we wouldn't know. It would be unethical and unprofessional for a TV executive to leak a fighter contract.

I'm asking how some conditions could have information of Wilder's on it? What could possibly be on there? It wasn't a contract. They would have to sit down and discuss exactly what that contract would entail. But those meetings were cancelled. They were just conditions, nothing more. There wouldn't be any private stuff on there. I mean, how could there be?