Comments Thread For: WBA, Mendoza Named As Defendants In Charr's Amended Lawsuit Against Don King

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sid-Knee
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Oct 2015
    • 18249
    • 1,091
    • 731
    • 155,532

    #131
    Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF

    Yes, someone privy to the email leaked it to the media, but asked them not to post it publicly. Thus far, nobody has.
    The media has seen it, but they didn't leak it? How convenient hey? Which media was this?

    Comment

    • Sid-Knee
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Oct 2015
      • 18249
      • 1,091
      • 731
      • 155,532

      #132
      Originally posted by MONGOOSE66

      That’s what I figured gossip girl.
      You figured you're not talking about boxing even though you're claiming you want to? You're very mixed up aren't you.

      Comment

      • MONGOOSE66
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Sep 2011
        • 7739
        • 1,609
        • 620
        • 29,199

        #133
        Originally posted by Sid-Knee

        You figured you're not talking about boxing even though you're claiming you want to? You're very mixed up aren't you.
        Nope just so easy to rag on a “wannabe”. Show me ANYWHERE where you actually discuss the fight game”. Not gossip, promoters, law suits, here say, whose better, or rumors. Any post. Go ahead. Just give me 1.

        Comment

        • Sid-Knee
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Oct 2015
          • 18249
          • 1,091
          • 731
          • 155,532

          #134
          Originally posted by MONGOOSE66

          Nope just so easy to rag on a “wannabe”. Show me ANYWHERE where you actually discuss the fight game”. Not gossip, promoters, law suits, here say, whose better, or rumors. Any post. Go ahead. Just give me 1.
          For someone who really wants to spend time talking about boxing, you do spend enough talking about something you don't want to.

          Are you being held at gunpoint? Wink twice if so.

          Comment

          • MONGOOSE66
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Sep 2011
            • 7739
            • 1,609
            • 620
            • 29,199

            #135
            Originally posted by Sid-Knee

            For someone who really wants to spend time talking about boxing, you do spend enough talking about something you don't want to.

            Are you being held at gunpoint? Wink twice if so.
            It’s quite a simple request darlin. You got nothing. Are you picking a fist fight with Cannabus?? Cause from your writings U know nothing of fighting. I do suggest you grow your nails out LOL.

            Comment

            • Sid-Knee
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Oct 2015
              • 18249
              • 1,091
              • 731
              • 155,532

              #136
              Originally posted by MONGOOSE66

              It’s quite a simple request darlin. You got nothing. Are you picking a fist fight with Cannabus?? Cause from your writings U know nothing of fighting. I do suggest you grow your nails out LOL.
              What is the request? Why don't i talk about boxing? Well, it's pretty simple really. It's because i'm talking about something you don't want to talk about at the minute. But here you are, you can't get enough.

              Don't worry. I knew you were keeping an eye on me. It's what happens when someone gets put in their place. But yes, the Kid wants to meet me in Ireland. However, he's trying to back out of it. Same old with him.

              Comment

              • WBC WBA IBF
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Mar 2008
                • 1123
                • 305
                • 0
                • 61,791

                #137
                Originally posted by Sid-Knee
                The media has seen it, but they didn't leak it? How convenient
                People are shown things off the record all the time, or as background information for an article, even if the source doesn't want the document itself uploaded and posted.

                You continue to try to distract from the fact that Hearn was busted for lying about UK rights and never disputed that Espinoza's screen shot was authentic.

                Comment

                • Sid-Knee
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Oct 2015
                  • 18249
                  • 1,091
                  • 731
                  • 155,532

                  #138
                  Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF

                  People are shown things off the record all the time, or as background information for an article, even if the source doesn't want the document itself uploaded and posted.

                  You continue to try to distract from the fact that Hearn was busted for lying about UK rights and never disputed that Espinoza's screen shot was authentic.
                  Which media was it? And why would they need to see the "Private" conditions? For what purpose? If Media are shown "Private" conditions, then they're not private are they?
                  Last edited by Sid-Knee; 09-02-2022, 03:00 PM.

                  Comment

                  • WBC WBA IBF
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Mar 2008
                    • 1123
                    • 305
                    • 0
                    • 61,791

                    #139
                    Originally posted by Sid-Knee
                    Which media was it? And why would they need to see the "Private" conditions? For what purpose? If Media are shown "Private" conditions, then they're not private are they?
                    Wouldn't matter. Espinoza proved Sky got UK TV and Hearn didn't dispute that the screen shot was legitimate. You're grasping at straws.

                    Comment

                    • Sid-Knee
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Oct 2015
                      • 18249
                      • 1,091
                      • 731
                      • 155,532

                      #140
                      Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF

                      Wouldn't matter. Espinoza proved Sky got UK TV and Hearn didn't dispute that the screen shot was legitimate. You're grasping at straws.
                      I'll just repost this...

                      Which media was it? And why would they need to see the "Private" conditions? For what purpose? If Media are shown "Private" conditions, then they're not private are they?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP