Comments Thread For: WBA, Mendoza Named As Defendants In Charr's Amended Lawsuit Against Don King
Collapse
-
Nope just so easy to rag on a “wannabe”. Show me ANYWHERE where you actually discuss the fight game”. Not gossip, promoters, law suits, here say, whose better, or rumors. Any post. Go ahead. Just give me 1.Comment
-
For someone who really wants to spend time talking about boxing, you do spend enough talking about something you don't want to.
Are you being held at gunpoint? Wink twice if so.Comment
-
It’s quite a simple request darlin. You got nothing. Are you picking a fist fight with Cannabus?? Cause from your writings U know nothing of fighting. I do suggest you grow your nails out LOL.Comment
-
What is the request? Why don't i talk about boxing? Well, it's pretty simple really. It's because i'm talking about something you don't want to talk about at the minute. But here you are, you can't get enough.
Don't worry. I knew you were keeping an eye on me. It's what happens when someone gets put in their place. But yes, the Kid wants to meet me in Ireland. However, he's trying to back out of it. Same old with him.Comment
-
People are shown things off the record all the time, or as background information for an article, even if the source doesn't want the document itself uploaded and posted.
You continue to try to distract from the fact that Hearn was busted for lying about UK rights and never disputed that Espinoza's screen shot was authentic.Comment
-
Which media was it? And why would they need to see the "Private" conditions? For what purpose? If Media are shown "Private" conditions, then they're not private are they?
People are shown things off the record all the time, or as background information for an article, even if the source doesn't want the document itself uploaded and posted.
You continue to try to distract from the fact that Hearn was busted for lying about UK rights and never disputed that Espinoza's screen shot was authentic.Last edited by Sid-Knee; 09-02-2022, 03:00 PM.Comment
-
Wouldn't matter. Espinoza proved Sky got UK TV and Hearn didn't dispute that the screen shot was legitimate. You're grasping at straws.Comment
-
I'll just repost this...
Which media was it? And why would they need to see the "Private" conditions? For what purpose? If Media are shown "Private" conditions, then they're not private are they?Comment
Comment