Comments Thread For: WBA, Mendoza Named As Defendants In Charr's Amended Lawsuit Against Don King

[WBC WBA IBF]

I'm asking how some conditions could have information of Wilder's on it? What could possibly be on there? It wasn't a contract.

I said Wilder, PBC and other partners may not want their personal information or proprietary business information posted. We don't know everything listed in the four pages and we don't know who would be upset if the full document leaked.

But we do know Sky was offered UK rights and Hearn was exposed as a liar.

[Sid-Knee]

I said Wilder, PBC and other partners may not want their personal information or proprietary business information posted. We don't know everything listed in the four pages and we don't know who would be upset if the full document leaked.

But we do know Sky was offered UK rights and Hearn was exposed as a liar.

Conditions do not contain any information about PBC, Wilder or any partners that is private . They are conditions to Eddie and AJ that they have to accept. Why would anything private be in a set of conditions?

Give it a go and let's see if you can come up with some supposed information that would need to be private on a set of conditions? I'd love to read your laughable ideas.

Tell me what Eddie and AJ had to accept from those conditions? It was a set of conditions that they couldn't possibly accept. The whole point was the propaganda and that's it. They never wanted the fight. Those conditions were bogus. We already know that no rematch was in there. But do you know what else was there?

[WBC WBA IBF]

Conditions do not contain any information about PBC, Wilder or any partners that is private . They are conditions to Eddie and AJ that they have to accept. Why would anything private be in a set of conditions?

A four page contract, containing highly sensitive information, wouldn't be appropriate to leak on the internet. The public doesn't need to know how the fighters and their managers and promoters conduct business.

[Sid-Knee]

A four page contract, containing highly sensitive information, wouldn't be appropriate to leak on the internet. The public doesn't need to know how the fighters and their managers and promoters conduct business.

It wasn't a contract though. How could it be when they didn't sit down and discuss what the contract would contain?

Nor was it 4 pages.

Now tell me, what kind of information would be so private in a set of conditions? Give me examples?

We can do this all day every day if you want. But your deflections are not sufficient enough as an argument. Sorry.

[WBC WBA IBF]

It wasn't a contract though. How could it be when they didn't sit down and discuss what the contract would contain?

Nor was it 4 pages.

Now tell me, what kind of information would be so private in a set of conditions? Give me examples?

We can do this all day every day if you want. But your deflections are not sufficient enough as an argument. Sorry.

Yes it was four pages, you're just blatantly lying.

A term sheet of that nature would typically disclose guaranteed purses, which sponsors have priority, how much the networks and sponsors have offered to guarantee up front, what the closed circuit rights would sell for, which venues have priority, and all sorts of arrangements Wilder and/or PBC wouldn't want public.

All you want to do is distract from the fact that Hearn was exposed as a liar by the UK rights screen shot, which Hearn never denied was real.

[Sid-Knee]

Yes it was four pages, you're just blatantly lying.

A term sheet of that nature would typically disclose guaranteed purses, which sponsors have priority, how much the networks and sponsors have offered to guarantee up front, what the closed circuit rights would sell for, which venues have priority, and all sorts of arrangements Wilder and/or PBC wouldn't want public.

All you want to do is distract from the fact that Hearn was exposed as a liar by the UK rights screen shot, which Hearn never denied was real.

How can i be lying on it being 4 pages when Espinoza refused to reveal the supposed 4 pages with Eddie saying it was a few paragraphs?

Wilder wasn't guaranteed anything. It was AJ who got the guarantee. Wilder's pay would be decided after all the money had come in. So you're wrong. But why would it need to be private on who was getting what? That's a big contradiction on Wilder refusing to continue with negotiations after asking what AJ was getting paid on the DAZN deal. Care to explain yourself here? If they were private, why did Haymon, Finkle and Wilder want to know them? That's hypocrisy and a contradiction.

There were no sponsors.

Why would venues need privacy? Haha. You're just making all this up as you go along and trying to cast it as legit. It's nonsense. Venues that get priority are always disclosed in many fights. There is no secrecy.

We would have to see ALL of the conditions before we can accept whether they would be accepted or not. That's how propaganda works, ******. Those conditions are there to make sure the fight doesn't happen. Then you spread false rumours to sell Wilder and his bum fights as per usual.

[WBC WBA IBF]

How can i be lying on it being 4 pages

Because it was four pages, as widely reported by legit news outlets.

[Sid-Knee]

Because it was four pages, as widely reported by legit news outlets.

What, so news outlets were able to see these conditions, but according to you, they were private? You're contradicting yourself every time out now.

Why did Haymon, Finkle and Wilder want to know about how much AJ was getting in the DAZN deal? Wasn't that private?

[MONGOOSE66]

Conditions do not contain any information about PBC, Wilder or any partners that is private . They are conditions to Eddie and AJ that they have to accept. Why would anything private be in a set of conditions?

Give it a go and let's see if you can come up with some supposed information that would need to be private on a set of conditions? I'd love to read your laughable ideas.

Tell me what Eddie and AJ had to accept from those conditions? It was a set of conditions that they couldn't possibly accept. The whole point was the propaganda and that's it. They never wanted the fight. Those conditions were bogus. We already know that no rematch was in there. But do you know what else was there?

Who gives a fook… talk fighting or move on to financial website where you might excel but I doubt it.

[Sid-Knee]

Who gives a fook… talk fighting or move on to financial website where you might excel but I doubt it.

Then go on threads about fighting then. What are you doing wasting time on here and making a post? Seems ****** to me. Nobody is forcing you to be here and making posts. Mind your own business.