Comments Thread For: Wallin's Promoter: Wilder Should Fight Otto To Prove He's Really On His Way Back

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kannabis Kid
    BlackRobb's Step-Dad
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Aug 2009
    • 6202
    • 811
    • 620
    • 40,319

    #81
    Originally posted by Sid-Knee

    Nobody said anything about holding all 4 titles you 5th world idiot. You said the 4 belt era. It's you who needs to learn the difference.

    When did the 4 belt era start? The question is simple, but you keep on deflecting for a reason.
    Yeah 4 belt era meaning any one of the 4, go google it inbred bald boy.

    Comment

    • Sid-Knee
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Oct 2015
      • 18249
      • 1,091
      • 731
      • 155,532

      #82
      Originally posted by Kannabis Kid
      Yeah 4 belt era meaning any one of the 4, go google it inbred bald boy.
      No, the 4 belt era is when the last of the big 4 came into play. That was the WBO title back in 1989. As i say, the clue is in the title. Why would it be called "The 4 belt era" any time before this if there wasn't even 4 belts around? Haha.

      So tell me when the 4 belt era started? What was the date?

      Comment

      • Kannabis Kid
        BlackRobb's Step-Dad
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Aug 2009
        • 6202
        • 811
        • 620
        • 40,319

        #83
        Originally posted by Sid-Knee

        No, the 4 belt era is when the last of the big 4 came into play. That was the WBO title back in 1989. As i say, the clue is in the title. Why would it be called "The 4 belt era" any time before this if there wasn't even 4 belts around? Haha.

        So tell me when the 4 belt era started? What was the date?
        Nope 4 belt era meaning any one of the 4 belts it's there to be seen.

        Comment

        • Sid-Knee
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Oct 2015
          • 18249
          • 1,091
          • 731
          • 155,532

          #84
          Originally posted by Kannabis Kid
          Nope 4 belt era meaning any one of the 4 belts it's there to be seen.
          So when do you think the "4 belt era" started then? Give me a date?

          Comment

          • hhh1200
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2014
            • 3571
            • 1,054
            • 195
            • 11,618

            #85
            Wilder will fight someone who will stand right in front of him to get knocked out. If he had to chase Gerald Washington for 4-5 rounds, he might need till the end of the fight to catch Wallin. That's not the comeback fight PBC is looking for.

            Kownacki
            Helenius
            Big Pharmacy Miller - beef like Breazeale so perfect KO victim.
            Ruiz - after a tune-up, too dangerous with fast hands vs a rusty Wilder
            Last edited by hhh1200; 07-07-2022, 03:38 PM.

            Comment

            • Kannabis Kid
              BlackRobb's Step-Dad
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Aug 2009
              • 6202
              • 811
              • 620
              • 40,319

              #86
              Originally posted by Sid-Knee
              e
              So when do you think the "4 belt era" started then? Give me a date?
              You know how to use Google it started with the WBA/WBC if it isn't one of those or (not and because you are inbred and don't know the difference) the WBO/IBF then it doesn't count. Therefore England doesn't have any 3 division champions sorry and Calzaghe never held any of those belts at 175 so was he really a 2 division champion?

              I mean but what do you expect from a country with 66+ million people and only 100 world champions. Did you know the small island of Puerto Rico only has 2+ million people yet half the champions the UK does? Haha.
              Last edited by Kannabis Kid; 07-07-2022, 05:15 PM.

              Comment

              • Sid-Knee
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Oct 2015
                • 18249
                • 1,091
                • 731
                • 155,532

                #87
                Originally posted by Kannabis Kid
                You know how to use Google it started with the WBA/WBC if it isn't one of those or (not and because you are inbred and don't know the difference) the WBO/IBF then it doesn't count. Therefore England doesn't have any 3 division champions sorry and Calzaghe never held any of those belts at 175 so was he really a 2 division champion?

                I mean but what do you expect from a country with 66+ million people and only 100 world champions. Did you know the small island of Puerto Rico only has 2+ million people yet half the champions the UK does? Haha.
                The WBA was created in 1962. The WBC was created in 1963. So, you believe the 4 belt era was either 62/63? Is that correct?

                Duke McKenzie and Ricky Burns held titles at 3 weights. There's two you idiot.

                Calzaghe held the true championship at Lightheavy. He was the lineal champion. The only one that truly means anything.

                Yes, i know Puerto Rico only has 2 million +. So why do you do much worse than we do when on a per capita basis? Haha. Duh.

                Comment

                • Kannabis Kid
                  BlackRobb's Step-Dad
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 6202
                  • 811
                  • 620
                  • 40,319

                  #88
                  Originally posted by Sid-Knee

                  The WBA was created in 1962. The WBC was created in 1963. So, you believe the 4 belt era was either 62/63? Is that correct?

                  Duke McKenzie and Ricky Burns held titles at 3 weights. There's two you idiot.

                  Calzaghe held the true championship at Lightheavy. He was the lineal champion. The only one that truly means anything.

                  Yes, i know Puerto Rico only has 2 million +. So why do you do much worse than we do when on a per capita basis? Haha. Duh.
                  That's the start of the 4 belt era any one of those 4 belts counts just drop it man you lost long ago Bob Fitzsimmons doesn't count and he got knocked out by 2 American middleweights lmao but don't worry we know that he was old and blah blah blah typical excuses I'll save you from rewriting them.

                  Ricky Burns is Scottish. When England plays Scotland in football who do you root for?

                  I already gave McKenzie credit in the other post but he is no one to be remembered that's why I forgot about him and most Brits these days probably don't even know who he is either.

                  Calzaghe fought 2 40 year olds for an intangible title. It's not one of 4 we have been referring to so it doesn't count. Joe Calzaghe only held tangible belts at 168 and he's Welsh not English either. When Wales plays England in football who do you root for? lmao

                  USA and Mexico have more champions in TOTAL so who cares about per capita? It's a numbers game and we blow you out of the water every time you will never even come close and that's what hurts you so bad.

                  Comment

                  • Sid-Knee
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Oct 2015
                    • 18249
                    • 1,091
                    • 731
                    • 155,532

                    #89
                    Originally posted by Kannabis Kid
                    That's the start of the 4 belt era any one of those 4 belts counts just drop it man you lost long ago Bob Fitzsimmons doesn't count and he got knocked out by 2 American middleweights lmao but don't worry we know that he was old and blah blah blah typical excuses I'll save you from rewriting them.

                    Ricky Burns is Scottish. When England plays Scotland in football who do you root for?

                    I already gave McKenzie credit in the other post but he is no one to be remembered that's why I forgot about him and most Brits these days probably don't even know who he is either.

                    Calzaghe fought 2 40 year olds for an intangible title. It's not one of 4 we have been referring to so it doesn't count. Joe Calzaghe only held tangible belts at 168 and he's Welsh not English either. When Wales plays England in football who do you root for? lmao

                    USA and Mexico have more champions in TOTAL so who cares about per capita? It's a numbers game and we blow you out of the water every time you will never even come close and that's what hurts you so bad.
                    So with the titles in the WBA and the WBC, there was now a "4 belt era" with only two titles around? Haha.

                    So Fitzsimmons being beaten at mid 40's is just an excuse from me. But you've claimed the same "Excuse" with Jones and Hopkins? Hopkins was close to prime when he fought Calzaghe. Fitzsimmons weas shot to pieces. There's a big difference. But when did Jones become 40 years old at the time of fighting Calzaghe?

                    Fitzsimmons started at 148. Jack Johnson was much bigger than that. So where are you getting this delusional idea that he was a Middleweight?

                    Against O'Brien, Fitzsimmons weighed 10 lbs less and was shot to pieces. Look at how many losses they both have at the end of their careers.

                    So everyone is wrong when acknowledging Calzaghe as a two-weight champion then? Haha.

                    The US and Mexico have more titles because they are much bigger nations than ours, ******. Why do you think it's rational to have the same amount of champions historically when your numbers are so much greater than ours? Per capita is how to break it down rationally. It's what intelligent people do. Of course there's more in those boxing nations than ours. You have the much greater chance to do so. Haha. But you're still the one bringing up numbers when talking about Puerto Rico. You're the one talking about per capita you imbecile. That's how f3cked in the head you are. You genuinely don't know what is going on in reality. You're all over the place. You're unhinged.

                    Comment

                    • Kannabis Kid
                      BlackRobb's Step-Dad
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 6202
                      • 811
                      • 620
                      • 40,319

                      #90
                      Originally posted by Sid-Knee

                      So with the titles in the WBA and the WBC, there was now a "4 belt era" with only two titles around? Haha.

                      So Fitzsimmons being beaten at mid 40's is just an excuse from me. But you've claimed the same "Excuse" with Jones and Hopkins? Hopkins was close to prime when he fought Calzaghe. Fitzsimmons weas shot to pieces. There's a big difference. But when did Jones become 40 years old at the time of fighting Calzaghe?

                      Fitzsimmons started at 148. Jack Johnson was much bigger than that. So where are you getting this delusional idea that he was a Middleweight?

                      Against O'Brien, Fitzsimmons weighed 10 lbs less and was shot to pieces. Look at how many losses they both have at the end of their careers.

                      So everyone is wrong when acknowledging Calzaghe as a two-weight champion then? Haha.

                      The US and Mexico have more titles because they are much bigger nations than ours, ******. Why do you think it's rational to have the same amount of champions historically when your numbers are so much greater than ours? Per capita is how to break it down rationally. It's what intelligent people do. Of course there's more in those boxing nations than ours. You have the much greater chance to do so. Haha. But you're still the one bringing up numbers when talking about Puerto Rico. You're the one talking about per capita you imbecile. That's how f3cked in the head you are. You genuinely don't know what is going on in reality. You're all over the place. You're unhinged.
                      4 belt era is including anyone of those belts it's been stated and it's acknowledged by all non-inbreds so nice try.

                      You came up with the excuse for Fitzimmons losing I didn't I was just repeating it for you since your thoughts are so scrambled all the time. I acknowledged that Calzaghe beat them when they were in their 40's that's all it holds no correlation because I never made an excuse for Hopkins or Jones losing they both even dropped him lmao. He retired after that snorting his paychecks away while never fighting Carl Froch in his prime. Meanwhile when Fitzsimmons lost to an American it was because of his age but when Calzaghe beats 2 past prime fighters who were in their 40's by decision it's a good win and he's the lineal champ lmao.

                      The US and Mexico have more titles because they have better fighters pretty simple. I mean just look at what the Mexicans have been doing to Brits as of late bunch of beatdowns in their hometowns. Just know that in your lifetime even claiming 4 different countries you will never have more champions than the USA or Mexico and it'll be that way until the end of time.

                      I bring up Puerto Rico because you use the excuse that the reason you don't have more champions is because the size of your ****ty islands. Well Puerto Rico only has 2 million people yet they seem to have half the champs you do though. Get it? I literally have to repeat myself 4 times after repeatedly slapping you in the face with comparisons you just can't comprehend.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP