Do I have a reasonable argument for having Floyd Mayweather Jr as the greatest fighter of all time?

[maguirre]

[hugh grant]

Floyd is anywhere below pac. Id say where ever Pac is, Floyd is about 15 places below. So if Pac s your no1, then Floyd's your no16. If Pac s your no4, then Floyd's your no20

[Hype job]

He would have only beaten Duran out of the fab 4, even that's not a given.

He didn't face an elite guy in their prime throughout the entirety of his career.

[hugh grant]

He would have only beaten Duran out of the fab 4, even that's not a given.

He didn't face an elite guy in their prime throughout the entirety of his career.

True, Floyd didn't beat any elites in prime. Floyd s left asterix, and if people want to think Pac would have best floyd in a rematch or koed Floyd if they'd fought 6 years earlier theyd not be wrong. Many think pac best floyd as it is, so floyd s win over pac don't mean much.

If in people's hearts they think dlh would have beat floyd if they'd fought a couple of so years earlier, floyd s not proved otherwise, he left those asterix.
Again many think dlh already beat floyd as it is.

[Zaroku]

Jhooyy Ned’s a puto like you to walk him. Never post crap again.

[Hype job]

Who ducks Margarito and moves up to 154 to fight a far more dangerous opponent in Oscar De La Hoya?

Someone who understands the concept of risk/reward.