POLL: How To Score A Fight – Jabs To Powerpunches

[eco1]

Whomever hits the other guy more wins for me.

If I hit you 75 times with a jab in every round and you hit me 5 times with power punches, I think you lost.

[Cypocryphy]

I know Prescott got him, but that dude had pretty good power even though he's got a lot of lossed. Khan wasn't always chinny, he raised the war banners and beat great fighters in the early part of his career. He did have a chink in his chin which got bigger over time.



GGG won both fights, get over it.




You're the biggest crumb-off on this site and you've been punished mercilessly. But it has been a long time so I gues you forgot what pain feels like and maybe I stretched you a bit so now you're ready for more girth.

MMA you silly little pink man. They say a man is never the same once he's been castrated and you my dear Reek have been cropped senseless!

Effectiveness in this instance is applied to all unarmed combat under the Nevada Athletic Commission, regardless as to whether it's MMA, Kickboxing, or whatever. But if that's an issue, then let's keep it going, and we can look at ABCBoxing, which creates uniformity with the rules.

CLEAN PUNCHING – Simply put, fights are won by clean punches landing. Not all punches are created equally. The EFFECT of the punch is very important. Hard punches are certainly considered, as are the number of punches. There is no mathematical formula that equates the hard punches with lighter punches, but judges must be fair to take both into account. Also, good, solid body punches must be considered when judging a bout.

Fire and brimstone my guy. Fire and brimstone.

[War Room]

Effectiveness in this instance is applied to all unarmed combat under the Nevada Athletic Commission, regardless as to whether it's MMA, Kickboxing, or whatever.

When your genitals are cut from your body I get it ---> the pain is so great you can't think straight. At the end of the day, different sports are scored differently you ****** shitstain lmao.

[War Room]

Whomever hits the other guy more wins for me.

If I hit you 75 times with a jab in every round and you hit me 5 times with power punches, I think you lost.

That's how you score amateurs dude lol.

[eco1]

That's how you score amateurs dude lol.

You asked me how I think it should be done, not how you think it should be done.

[Silence]

I don't know about that. Golovkin did where sunglasses but that was due to having a cut on the side of his right eye. Canelo had a bad cut on the side of his left eye, so it seemed pretty even as far as face damage was concerned. (And don't go post any of those photoshopped images on the internet where Golovkin was made to look like he was hit by a bus. All of them are bull**** grifters trying to redefine history.)

Technically, the effectiveness of the punch needs to be taken into account, regardless as to whether it's a jab or a power punch. That being said, of course a jab will not be as powerful as a straight, hook, overhand, etc. However, Golovkin outlanded Canelo by 60 punches approximately, and he outlanded Canelo is every single round except the sixth round.

You have a much stronger case arguing that Golovkin won than Canelo. Much stronger. But if you wanted to go with a draw, I wouldn't argue otherwise too much.

GGG wore sunglasses because of bruise and swollen eyes, not because of cut. Canelo has a cut too and he didn't wear sunglasses. Because his face was clean asf except cut.

Bivol, Lara and Mayweather gave the most facial damages to Canelo. Because Bivol and Mayweather beat him "clearly". Bivol landed clean punches with LHW power, Mayweather landed even cleaner punches with "SFW" power. Key concept is "clean punching". GGG barely landed clean punches in both fights. In a normal world, Golovkin should give much more damage than Mayweather.

Canelo after Golovkin 2

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRv2Ycu0Ogm_OLJuFPC0mYDkMfW8yH37mCN-Q&usqp=CAU.jpg

Canelo after Bivol and Mayweather

MAP13868.jpg

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTZrxroM0-6maYDBk8xB5zHGVv0INQR-B5g_w&usqp=CAU.jpg

[War Room]

You asked me how I think it should be done, not how you think it should be done.

I didn't ask you anything ---> I merely responded to your comment so lets start getting some facts straight? I'm telling you as a fact that how you score fights is how amateur fights are scored. I know because I used to fight in the amateurs. This is not an opinion ---> opinions are devoid of facts. The facts on planet Earth of how to score professional boxing is not how many punches you land ---> there is a criterion which I've laid out called the 10 Point Must System that was installed by the WBC in 1968.

I'll repost my post I've reposted 4 posts now smdh!

The professional criterion for scoring boxing is --->

1. Clean punching (power versus quantity)
2. Effective aggressiveness
3. Ring generalship
4. Defense

”The test to measure the awarding of points for “offensive boxing” should be the number of direct, clean punches delivered with the knuckle part of the closed glove on any part of the scoring zone of the opponent’s body above the belt line. The judges should also consider the effect of blows received versus the number of punches delivered. Punches that are blocked or deflected should not be considered in tabulating your score. Blocked or deflected punches that land foul are not to be considered fouls in the awarding of points at the end of the round.”⁹ (Professional Boxing Judges, Chapter III – Scoring Zone).

Source: Association of Boxing Commissions (ABC)

10-Point system
The 10 Point system was first introduced in 1968 by the World Boxing Council (WBC) as a rational way of scoring fights. It was viewed as such because it allowed judges to reward knockdowns and distinguish between close rounds, as well as rounds where one fighter clearly dominated their opponent. Furthermore, the subsequent adoption of this system, both nationally and internationally, allowed for greater judging consistency, which was something that was sorely needed at the time. There are many factors that inform the judge's decision but the most important of these are: clean punching, effective aggressiveness, ring generalship and defense. Judges use these metrics as a means of discerning which fighter has a clear advantage over the other, regardless of how minute the advantage.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profes...0_Point_System

Amateur Boxing Scoring

It seems that lot of us boxing fans have always taught that boxing is scored by who lands the most punches in a fight. Unfortunately for a lot of people that's not the way it works. In the amateurs boxing is scored by counting the punches the whole fight each round combine, a knockdown only counts as a punch and does not give u any kind of advantage, same is with the standing 8 count.

In pro boxing things are a lot different fights are scored round by round, 10 points if u win a round, 9 if u lose a round, a point less if u get knockdown, or loosing a pint for fault. A whole lot of people do not understand this rules, that's just how boxing works in the pros.

Source: https://bleacherreport.com/articles/...o-the-amateurs

If you don't know this by now maybe try this forum ---> http://www.macramelovers.com/blog/ma...-artist-forum/

[eco1]

I didn't ask you anything ---> I merely responded to your comment so lets start getting some facts straight? I'm telling you as a fact that how you score fights is how amateur fights are scored. I know because I used to fight in the amateurs. This is not an opinion ---> opinions are devoid of facts. The facts on planet Earth of how to score professional boxing is not how many punches you land ---> there is a criterion which I've laid out called the 10 Point Must System that was installed by the WBC in 1968.

I'll repost my post I've reposted 4 posts now smdh!

The professional criterion for scoring boxing is --->

1. Clean punching (power versus quantity)
2. Effective aggressiveness
3. Ring generalship
4. Defense

”The test to measure the awarding of points for “offensive boxing” should be the number of direct, clean punches delivered with the knuckle part of the closed glove on any part of the scoring zone of the opponent’s body above the belt line. The judges should also consider the effect of blows received versus the number of punches delivered. Punches that are blocked or deflected should not be considered in tabulating your score. Blocked or deflected punches that land foul are not to be considered fouls in the awarding of points at the end of the round.”⁹ (Professional Boxing Judges, Chapter III – Scoring Zone).

Source: Association of Boxing Commissions (ABC)

10-Point system
The 10 Point system was first introduced in 1968 by the World Boxing Council (WBC) as a rational way of scoring fights. It was viewed as such because it allowed judges to reward knockdowns and distinguish between close rounds, as well as rounds where one fighter clearly dominated their opponent. Furthermore, the subsequent adoption of this system, both nationally and internationally, allowed for greater judging consistency, which was something that was sorely needed at the time. There are many factors that inform the judge's decision but the most important of these are: clean punching, effective aggressiveness, ring generalship and defense. Judges use these metrics as a means of discerning which fighter has a clear advantage over the other, regardless of how minute the advantage.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profes...0_Point_System

Amateur Boxing Scoring


Source: https://bleacherreport.com/articles/...o-the-amateurs

If you don't know this by now maybe try this forum ---> http://www.macramelovers.com/blog/ma...-artist-forum/

Do you have your period?

[Cypocryphy]

When your genitals are cut from your body I get it ---> the pain is so great you can't think straight. At the end of the day, different sports are scored differently you ****** shitstain lmao.

What do we have here? Back from the dead, War Room? We're not talking about that anymore, we're taking about the Association of Boxing Commissions (ABCBoxing)(<-- click the link). They create and expound on the rules for judging boxing matches that all commissions follow. Below is its rule for "clean punching." You're done!! Sent straight to hell!! (As an aside, it's amazing to me how many idiots are on here thinking that all punches are created equal when judging a fight. No wonder the scorecards on here are so wild.)

CLEAN PUNCHING – Simply put, fights are won by clean punches landing. Not all punches are created equally. The EFFECT of the punch is very important. Hard punches are certainly considered, as are the number of punches. There is no mathematical formula that equates the hard punches with lighter punches, but judges must be fair to take both into account. Also, good, solid body punches must be considered when judging a bout.

spawn-hell.gif

[Cypocryphy]

Not that defined is the answer.

Effective punching, doesn't matter what kind of punches, there's no point system for landing certain kinds of punches, this is not taekwondo.

Jabs, due to body mechanics, can never be as powerful as straights and hooks. It is what it is. And if you doubt what I say, then ask yourself how many people have been KO'd by a jab. Now ask yourself how many people have been KO'd by a hook. Enough said.