Comments Thread For: David Morrell: I'll Wreck David Benavidez Like Crawford Did His Brother!

[Mofias]

Allmighty sending Morell to save Charlo from further shame..?

Charlo is a Champ at 160
David has No Belt at 168
Only a Casual would expect a Champ to Compromise his Weight for someone without a Belt

[Mofias]

Why would Benavidez fight a prospect?

Because they are the Top Two at 168

[tokon]

. . . . when it's actually in the title. Lol you dumbass you can get over it because it's there to be seen.

Benavidez: Until I Get Plant, Charlo, Canelo, Andrade - I Don't See Myself Leaving 168

I still don't see "David Morrell", so where is it in the title?

[Oracle01]

Because they are the Top Two at 168

He is not even in the Ring top 10. What fantasy world are you living in?

[Kannabis Kid]

Benavidez: Until I Get Plant, Charlo, Canelo, Andrade - I Don't See Myself Leaving 168

I still don't see "David Morrell", so where is it in the title?

You didn't read where Morrell clearly stated he saw Benavidez mention his name? Or are you just forgetting that to try and make yourself seem right? The reason it's not in the title is because nobody knows who Morrell is everyone knows who the others are because aside from Plant they are all multi division champions. Like I said you are spreading a false narrative by saying the things you do without proper research.

Charlo is a Champ at 160
David has No Belt at 168
Only a Casual would expect a Champ to Compromise his Weight for someone without a Belt

Lol so why did Charlo get on Instagram live after drinking all day and call out David in the first place? Go watch Charlos energy whenever they mention Benavidez name he always says yeah we can fight maybe next year haha he isn't trying to make that happen he would rather fight the Suleckis Montiels and Adams of the world instead.

[Mammoth]

Because they are the Top Two at 168

No, they aren't

[tokon]

Originally posted by Kannabis Kid View Post
. . . . when it's actually in the title. Lol you dumbass you can get over it because it's there to be seen.

You didn't read where Morrell clearly stated he saw Benavidez mention his name? Or are you just forgetting that to try and make yourself seem right? The reason it's not in the title is because . . . .

So now it's not in the title? Who's the dumbass?? Just let it be man, there's nothing to see here.

[Mr Riatonon]

I'd like to see Benavides beat this Morrell guy up big-time especially for naming his brother

[Kannabis Kid]

Originally posted by Kannabis Kid View Post
. . . . when it's actually in the title. Lol you dumbass you can get over it because it's there to be seen.





So now it's not in the title? Who's the dumbass?? Just let it be man, there's nothing to see here.

Nice try but I don't expect much when you have a bag of feces for a brain. Why don't you quote what I wrote exactly you idiot? That was in reference to Benavidez name and how you suck at spelling you ****ing moron.

"Oh yeah? Then you went on to say "Maybe there's a reason benevidez isn't mentioning him?" while misspelling Benavidez when it's actually in the title. Lol you dumbass you can get over it because it's there to be seen." My exact post that you tried to manipulate in your favor you ****** inbred donkey. Post #38 to be exact.

And in case you didn't notice this isn't the article in question this is about Morrell comparing Crawfords performance against Benavidez brother and how he would do the same you illiterate twat. If you go back and check the article you would learn something and learn to shut the **** up when told to because the facts are there to be seen as stated.

[tokon]

And in case you didn't notice this isn't the article in question . . .

Now, rather than either you or I actually being dumbasses, this may actually be the root cause of the problem here?

This IS the article I was referring to: nothing about Morrell in either title or the body of the text.

It seems that you're referring to an entirely different article or set of quotes?

Not really something that merits your verbal abuse but, if that's how you choose to address things, nothing much else to say.

Over and out.