Canelo beat Callum Smith for WBA and vacant WBC, then undefeated Saunders for WBO, and undefeated Plant for IBF Crawford beat Thomas Dulorme for the WBO, Victor Postol for the WBC, and unbeaten Indongo for the WBA and IBF Charlo beat Jack Johnson for WBC, Jeison Rosario for IBF and WBA, and unbeaten Castano for WBO
With the exception of Castano, none of the above fighters have done anything notable since losing. Which one is the worst? I dunno, it's not their fault the route to undisputed was the aforementioned fighters, they just played the game with the cards they and others were dealt with.
To this day he is still avoiding to fight the very best in that division. He skipped an entire weight class just in order to duck him. Both Crawford and Charlo did it the right way without all the clever matchmaking on which opponent to choose.They fought the very best in their respective divisions. Which Includes each division's people's champion too unlike Canelo.
Crawford's have not aged well at all, that's for sure. Indongo has lost six fights in a row after Crawford. He was fighting in Africa, then he fought an old Ricky Burns for his titles. Dulorme is a C+ level fighter. He'd already been KO'd before he fought Crawford. Postal has also been losing a lot, with four losses after Crawford.
Jermell's is a little better, although aside from Castano, his opponents are not (were not) great.
So I think the easy answer is Crawford. Canelo's undisputed run is better than the others because he took out a whole division, one by one, and so far you can't say his opponents were bad.
Comment