Am I off base?

[IronDanHamza]

First 4 rounds were reasonably close, either way.

Canelo then won the 9th but other than that I gave every other round to Bivol.

[buddyr]

10-2 or 9-3 is the right score. NO way in hell Canelo won 5 rounds. Had Canelo won the 12th, it would have been a draw. Think about that.

[War Room]

The right man won, but people can get too caught up on scores and punch stats. For example, a flick jab counts in the tally as 1 jab, same as a hammer, real scoring jab. A punch that is not a jab by Malignaggi classes as a power punch, same as from Wilder, but hardly the same punch is it? Forget the stats. Here is how Nash called it.

Round 1. Bivol landed more, but his jabs were tippy-tippy, and played exactly into what Canelo would have wanted him to do. Canelo won R1 with the better, scoring work.
R2. A bit better from Bivol. I have this round to Bivol, but honestly, it could have went either way.
R3. Very close. I went Canelo, slightly better work.
R4. Very close, again, I slightly preferred the work of Canelo.

Now the fight changes. Bivol grows in confidence and he throws much more shots with real power, not just "power shots". What made Bivol grow in confidence? Well, it's 4 rounds in, there is not a blade of grass in it (regardless of the views of clowns) and he can take Canelo's power. He knows this now. Thinking it is one thing. Knowing it, is another thing entirely.

Bivol won 5,6,7,8,10,11,12 no debate.

Canelo won 9, no debate. the much better work came from him.

116-112 Bivol. Nash out.

You gave 3 of the first 4 rounds to Clenny FFS LMAO ROFL WTF??

[Nash out]

You gave 3 of the first 4 rounds to Clenny FFS LMAO ROFL WTF??

Yes. It could easily have been 2-2, but the first 4 rounds, there was nothing in it. Nash is an expert scorer, so if that's how Nash sees it, that's how it is. Nash gave Bivol 7 clear rounds out of the last 8. Nash scored the fight fairly. 116-112 Bivol, though would have been fine with 117-111 Bivol. Bivol was a class above for the bulk of the last 8 rounds, but not the first 4. Nash out. Legitimate boxing expert.

[War Room]

Yes. It could easily have been 2-2, but the first 4 rounds, there was nothing in it. Nash is an expert scorer, so if that's how Nash sees it, that's how it is. Nash gave Bivol 7 clear rounds out of the last 8. Nash scored the fight fairly. 116-112 Bivol, though would have been fine with 117-111 Bivol. Bivol was a class above for the bulk of the last 8 rounds, but not the first 4. Nash out. Legitimate boxing expert.

Legimate boxing expert, expert scorer LMAO! You're a flunky floozie with your arse hanging out.

Nash 'arsed' out lol.

[just the facts]

i think i had nelo doing a lot better than that, i gave him 3 rounds

So you scored it exactly one round differently than I did but you were compelled to post an ignorant comment? You’re a douche bag.

[just the facts]

The only difference between your card and all three official cards was the first 3 which were all for Canelo. Canelo was up after 9.

If you actually believe that, pretty sad……..

[just the facts]

WE should all be thankful that they actually gave it to Bivol...

Your right of course but isn’t that sad?

[Superbee]

Yes. It could easily have been 2-2, but the first 4 rounds, there was nothing in it. Nash is an expert scorer, so if that's how Nash sees it, that's how it is. Nash gave Bivol 7 clear rounds out of the last 8. Nash scored the fight fairly. 116-112 Bivol, though would have been fine with 117-111 Bivol. Bivol was a class above for the bulk of the last 8 rounds, but not the first 4. Nash out. Legitimate boxing expert.

In any rounds that Canelo scored, Bivol scored better, faster, more accurate and more volume ... I gave Ginger 4 rounds but it could have easily been only 2 ... Complete domination ...

[just the facts]

10-2 or 9-3 is the right score. NO way in hell Canelo won 5 rounds. Had Canelo won the 12th, it would have been a draw. Think about that.

Hard hitting facts!