Manny-Morales, Both Unaware or Ignorant?

[BBFM]

I can hardly understand what you're writing because you're english is so mind-numbingly poor.

Evos, it's called IMPLYING a meaning behind the words that you write. Do you understand that? It means you are not directly saying something, rather suggesting it. By being an obvious Pacquiao supporter and saying, "Morales may not box" you are implying that you think he will get dragged into a war. By saying, "We might see some bad calls by Cortez or he may try to give Morales more favor" you are implying that Cortez is going to make calls that will hurt Pacquiao and help Morales, thus the incompetent part. By saying, "I have no doubts that Pac could win this fight but the bigger problem here is WILL THEY ALLOW HIM TO WIN WITHOUT A KO?" implies that you think the judges are going to rob him should the decision goes to the cards.

Maybe it's just the fact that you can't help but butcher the english language, but people misunderstand what you say (myself included) and misinterpret your posts. If you meant something else then no problemo...but Munn basically summed up everything you suggested in your post.

.... Good THING YOU WERENT REFERRING TO ME. I would of been owned.

[m00ks]

cmon, i just mentioned one of Pac's styles based on your statement that says, "Erik's long arms make the punches look crisp and accurate and if he connects, it'll look cleaner. " coz i can hardly imagine EM doing that to Manny's in-out style. but ofcourse you know very well that Manny has more than just that dont you? and you're right that anything can happen in the ring. but we're talking about winning based on styles here regardless of luck. coz if we'll be talking about luck, it'll be none sense when a good style of a fighter was smothered by just one freakin' punch. but if you're a smart and tough fighter, it wont be that easy unless your opponent is extra ordinary. have EM ever been cleanly KDed? i bet never, but that is yet to be seen when he faces an opponent with an exceptional punching power and speed like Manny. and if you see Manny hittable, much more with Morales. Manny is a moving target with good defense while EM has less of those. but he is durable.

I'm a big Pac fan. I saw practically all of his fights multiple times. I have his 2 documentaries vcds. I check his site everyday for news. But I'm also REALISTIC. Bro you're talking like Morales don't have chance, and "based on styles" he'll get beat by Pac. Your talking like it's a sure thing. I don't think you know Morales or have seen him enough to understand the magnitude
of the threat he poses in the ring....

[tracylee]

Honestly...if you are going to post this kind of BS then just don't post at all.

Tell me when exactly Morales has been known to get overly dirty in his fights? Please...I'd like each fight and each round where he directly used dirty tactics.

Why would Cortez favor Morales? Because you say so? Or is it because Cortez has bad blood with Manny and has a history of bias in his past

Your conspiracy theories (will THEY let Pac win without a KO) make YOU sound as if you have little faith in your fighter to go the distance. Evos it will all be okay...no one is out to get Pacquiao. If anything, if there are extremely close rounds, those rounds will probably go to Pacquiao because he is the flashier fighter of the two. In the mean time, stop making excuses before the fight.

I wondered the same thing OG! Morales is alot of things, but a dirty fighter is NOT one of them. Why in the hell does any fan feel the need to insult Erik just cause he's fighting Pac? I'll never understand that!

[.::|ULTIMATE|::.]

lol dirty tactics from one of the cleanest fighters in the sport hahaha... where do people come up with this stuff.

[tracylee]

lol dirty tactics from one of the cleanest fighters in the sport hahaha... where do people come up with this stuff.

I like Pac just fine, and I'm liking him more and more..each fight of his that I watch. That being said, some of his fans will say ANYTHING..no matter how outrageous, just cause their guy is fighting! I've read that Erik is a coward, cannot box, and now that he's dirty! Unbelievable! I've said it before, and I'll say it one more time...one can pump pac up without putting the other guy down!

[evosbm]

I can hardly understand what you're writing because you're english is so mind-numbingly poor.

Evos, it's called IMPLYING a meaning behind the words that you write. Do you understand that? It means you are not directly saying something, rather suggesting it. By being an obvious Pacquiao supporter and saying, "Morales may not box" you are implying that you think he will get dragged into a war. By saying, "We might see some bad calls by Cortez or he may try to give Morales more favor" you are implying that Cortez is going to make calls that will hurt Pacquiao and help Morales, thus the incompetent part. By saying, "I have no doubts that Pac could win this fight but the bigger problem here is WILL THEY ALLOW HIM TO WIN WITHOUT A KO?" implies that you think the judges are going to rob him should the decision goes to the cards.

Maybe it's just the fact that you can't help but butcher the english language, but people misunderstand what you say (myself included) and misinterpret your posts. If you meant something else then no problemo...but Munn basically summed up everything you suggested in your post.

oldgringo, let me teach you a little basic understanding on your word "IMPLYING". what you're trying to explain is not IMPLYING, that is simply "PUTTING WORDS INTO SOMEBODY ELSE'S MOUTH." and i dont think that kind of simple post is hard for you to understand. you can even explain it well, except you gave more malice in it. i used precise and simple terms to deliver what it realy meant but you basically gave it more meaning beyond the definition of terms used. now, just because one missed to type the associated word in a statement, doesnt mean he has poor english does he?

anyway, just to justify my basis for that post, i'll rather explain it further. this is based on my own opinion ofcourse in which you dont have the right to alter unless i wish to do so. pls take note of the difference of your choice of words as highlighted in your post.

when i said that EM "MAY not box", i ment EM could "possibly" just slug it out once he's tagged as he always did. this means he may or may not do it as he pleases. there's a BIG difference there in your explanation when you used the word "WILL". in which case has no other alternative way except as how you perceived it. got it?

when i said "we could be seeing bad calls from Cortez," i was thinkin' of Manny's fight with JMM when he got too many intentional low blows and yet Cortez didnt even gave JMM a single point deduction. plus, when JMM was KD'ed the 3rd time, he even let JMM rest for 15sec! isnt that all infavor of JMM? is that impossible to happen between Pac and EM? again to correct your explanation, you used the term "going to." but i used the word "could be" which means "again, only a possibility."

and when i said "will they allow him to win w/o a KO," this time its just a question whether they will or will not do anything ****** like what happenned in the past. i was thinkin' about the decision of PAC-JMM where Clements scored the first round 10-7 when it should have been 10-6 for Pac that caused Manny two world title. plus, Guy Jutras' total scoring is so questionable that in a close and tight rounds after the 1st, he scored 10 rounds for Marquez which is obviously impossible. even when Pacman faught MAB, there are a lot of bad calls of Laurance Cole against Manny which are so obvious. if it werent for the KO and the KD's, it could have also been a draw. you see how these things play a major part of every action? considering the fact that no Filipino fighter has ever won a fight in MGM Las Vegas? now what am saying here is that its not impossible to happen in Pac-EM match isnt it? again, its just a "possibility". but you kept on using the term "going to."

i hope this is reachable by your level of intelligence. if not, you can always use an adjective on my english as an excuse like you always do.

[evosbm]

I'm a big Pac fan. I saw practically all of his fights multiple times. I have his 2 documentaries vcds. I check his site everyday for news. But I'm also REALISTIC. Bro you're talking like Morales don't have chance, and "based on styles" he'll get beat by Pac. Your talking like it's a sure thing. I don't think you know Morales or have seen him enough to understand the magnitude
of the threat he poses in the ring....

cmon man, did i say anything about EM not getting any chance? how come you guys are so quick in putting words into others' mouth? again, i am saying these in my oppinion based on tactics and not by chances and i believe that am entitled for it. if you dont want it, fine. jsut dont take it personally. god, whats with you guys?

[evosbm]

hey, dont take this personally guys. this is just an oppinion ok? it is not impossible for every fighter to use some dirty tactics if they need to specially if the fight is going lopsided. am saying this based on what EM's countrymen had done when they faught Pacman. when felt that they are in trouble and they cant win the fight by doing it fairly. it has been proven by MAB and JMM. so dont tell me that its impossible for EM to do this. its all possible to all fighters. that is if you realy know how it is. i said it before and i'll say it again. these are just possiblities so dont take it personally. now you may say your own oppinion but dont start smack taklking like some did. i dont start, i just bounce back.

[evosbm]

if any of you realy do think that am wrong. then post your reeasons why you think any of what i said is IMPOSSIBLE to happen in the Pac-EM fight. prove me that it is impossible. i dont understand what's to react with the word "POSSIBILITY."

[evosbm]

funny. many had reacted but none can explain their side how its not possible that EM's capable of using some dirty tactics. maybe you all realized that its part of the sport and every fighter is capable of using it specially if the situation calls for it. MAB did some. does that mean MAB has become a legend coz he fight dirty? JMM did it. does it mean he holds two titles coz he plays dirty? do they always do it? i guess not. but one thing is certain. they all did it to Pacquiao. and i dont see it impossible for Erik to do so if he needs to. its all part of the game. but it is also the job of the referee to watch these. so quit wining ok? specially if you cant realy defend your wining...