Lmao. This is going to be awesome man. I have not looked forward to a fight like this since Vargas vs de la hoya. Everyones going to come after the fight and start **** talking, making excuses, someones going to have a badnight haha.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Manny-Morales, Both Unaware or Ignorant?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by m00kslol I actually think Many will win with just that, the in and out movements. You think he's backing up then BAM BAM BAM 3 shot combo on your face lol Out of no where. But Manny can still be hit, and you know in boxing it only takes one freak punch to get you hurt or to down. ANYTHING CAN HAPPENThat's what makes teh sport beautifull
Comment
-
One thing I wonder is how Pac will deal with Morales right hand since he has always been open to it. I think Roach will drill that into him and he will neutrilize alot of Morales and im sure Morales will do the same with Pacs left. I see one major factor in this fight and that is speed and Pacs fast starting pace and Morales slow pace. I doubt he can change that now and when Pac comes at him full speed in round 1 i think Morales will throw stategy out the window. Its gonna be a war i cant wait.
Comment
-
Originally posted by evosbmsome things i can guarantee is EM may not box but would definitely be using dirty tactics (like MAB and JMM did) and will intintly watching more on the best timing for his uppercut. but Pac is gonna use his speed to land his gloves first before EM could make his move. we could also be seeing bad calls from Cortez against Pacman or try to give EM more favor. i wouldnt be surprised if it happens. specially at MGM. i have no doubt that Pac could win this fight but the bigger problem here is will they allow him to win w/o a KO?
Comment
-
Originally posted by FloydmayweatherOne thing I wonder is how Pac will deal with Morales right hand since he has always been open to it. I think Roach will drill that into him and he will neutrilize alot of Morales and im sure Morales will do the same with Pacs left. I see one major factor in this fight and that is speed and Pacs fast starting pace and Morales slow pace. I doubt he can change that now and when Pac comes at him full speed in round 1 i think Morales will throw stategy out the window. Its gonna be a war i cant wait.
Comment
-
Originally posted by VkreWIm learning that this is the easiest place to make enemys Im going to recommend these forums to my friends hahahaha.
"MAB, or "Morales".
The boricuas will attack relentlessly if you say "Hopkins" or "Wright".
Tysonhuggers will attack the heavyweight discussions, and the haters are rampant like the plague.
Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!
Comment
-
Originally posted by MunnThis is pure ****. Morales won't box, Cortez is incompetent, Pac won't be allowed to win, and the dog ate your homework, right?
Comment
-
Originally posted by evosbmnope, i guess the dog ate your brains out that you can hardly understand what you're reading. its says Morales MAY NOT box not WON'T box. have you seen any word like incompetent in that post? and worse, who said Pac wont be allowed to win? it should be interpreted as... "he may if he KO EM." now i think you reacted like **** by posting **** dont you think?
I can hardly understand what you're writing because you're english is so mind-numbingly poor.
Evos, it's called IMPLYING a meaning behind the words that you write. Do you understand that? It means you are not directly saying something, rather suggesting it. By being an obvious Pacquiao supporter and saying, "Morales may not box" you are implying that you think he will get dragged into a war. By saying, "We might see some bad calls by Cortez or he may try to give Morales more favor" you are implying that Cortez is going to make calls that will hurt Pacquiao and help Morales, thus the incompetent part. By saying, "I have no doubts that Pac could win this fight but the bigger problem here is WILL THEY ALLOW HIM TO WIN WITHOUT A KO?" implies that you think the judges are going to rob him should the decision goes to the cards.
Maybe it's just the fact that you can't help but butcher the english language, but people misunderstand what you say (myself included) and misinterpret your posts. If you meant something else then no problemo...but Munn basically summed up everything you suggested in your post.
Comment
Comment