Comments Thread For: Tyson Fury Blasts Out Dillian Whyte in Sixth With Vicious Uppercut

[billeau2]

I’m no confusing anything, Fury today is a far more complete fighter than the one that beat Wlad, so of course I appreciate his boxing skill but that was a substandard Whyte, it simply was, yes it’s easy to say Tyson makes even good fighters look bad, but actually Whyte made it easy, he lacked everything that got him the title shot and imho an adrenaline dump ruined his night, because he was overwhelmed by the occasion and it just took his legs away and he was woeful, didn’t even make Fury earn it.

I disagree Fury would win easily against any of the others, Usyk even despite his size is actually even more technical and I have long said actually the one everyone says Fury would beat easily, Joshua, is potentially a bad match up for him because he is a good straight puncher and if you watch a lot of Fury you will see, when he gets caught it’s down the middle. He’ll be back, I reckon we’ll see him fight again.

How do you distinguish what Whyte didn't do by choice versus what Fury caused him not to do? When Fury fought Vlad K he stopped Klitsko from throwing punches. That was not Vlad having a bad night, it was timing and feints and using a well placed punch to great effect. I don't assume anything. Whyte is a professional and if he cannot perform in the ring it is because of the guy across from him.

Im not following your disagreement. My own feeling is that Usyk Fury is a toss up. Usyk is as great a fighter as Fury with different strengths and weaknesses. AS far as Joshua I don't comment much on joshua. Joshua has enough of a punch that it makes life interesting but I would think he is handled relatively easily by Fury, provided Fury comes in light and does not try to be cute with his weight to prove a point.

[Sid-Knee]

Eddie's both HW dogs lost their last fights. Must be hard on him and his fans. But that is no excuse to be spouting rubbish on the forum. Better stay silent if you cannot make sense.

Wilder at least had a plan. He was more aggressive in the last fight and started to go to the body. Sure, he couldn't execute it well but still got up the floor and dropped Fury in the third fight, not started a chicken dance. I am sure a "decent fight" would do better, but Whyte ain't that "decent fighter" we had hoped he would be for tonight's fight. Whyte, it seems, either had no plan or did not even come close to executing it if they had one. Honestly, I thought Whyte would give Fury a harder fight and I also said that in the forum but he turned up showing zero improvements or game plan.

I replied directly to the comment and point. Your first line has nothing to do with my reply. So the only one not making sense here is you. Don't try and be smart unless you have the substance. It gets rather embarrassing otherwise.

Wilder Never has a plan. He's far too ****** for one. All he did in that second fight was move backwards thinking Fury was a backfoot fighter where he could catch Fury coming in on the front foot. But if he and his equally incompetent team had actually studied Fury, they would have seen how silly that thought process was. And as such, they found out the hard way.

My point was the second fight, not the others. It's irrelevant as Whyte never got to fight a badly compromised Fury the way Wilder did in fight 1 and 3.

You should look back at who has dropped or wobbled Fury in his career if you think you need to be good to do so.

Fury didn't allow Whyte to do much. Great fighters have been made to look much worse over the years. It happens. Joe Louis was outclassed, dropped and stopped against a finished Schmelling. Tyson dominated by Douglas. Robinson dominated against a decent fighter coming in with Turpin. Why things like this is lost on people is genuinely beyond me. But hey, this is the crazy forum after all.

[Roj]

Whyte could take the straights from Fury. It was the uppercut that got him. Basic punches had Wilder all over the canvas looking like he was disabled. With a well timed uppercut like tonight, i'd expect him to still be asleep. Never in his life has he taken the kind of shots Whyte took from Joshua. That took a lot out of him. His chin was still solid afterwards, but it definitely had a lot taken from it after that fight.

None of that changes the fact Wilder knocked Fury down for a 15 count in the first fight that somehow came out to “8” with that biased backward-counting ref.

[billeau2]

Whyte could take the straights from Fury. It was the uppercut that got him. Basic punches had Wilder all over the canvas looking like he was disabled. With a well timed uppercut like tonight, i'd expect him to still be asleep. Never in his life has he taken the kind of shots Whyte took from Joshua. That took a lot out of him. His chin was still solid afterwards, but it definitely had a lot taken from it after that fight.

Oh sid.... you come here in damage control mode... and Im trying to figure out where this is going... I mean Fury is a Brit, that should make you happy happy . So Im waitin for "the angle." What is Sid here to protect? And whamo! there it is.

Folks Wilder may have lost to Fury? But he lost against sub standard punches... not the real kind like what he hit Whyte with!!! Is that it Sidney? lol. Talk about ridiculous... You have to be fckin kidding me. Look at the tripe you are asking people to swallow... I implore thee!!

[billeau2]

Eddie's both HW dogs lost their last fights. Must be hard on him and his fans. But that is no excuse to be spouting rubbish on the forum. Better stay silent if you cannot make sense.

Wilder at least had a plan. He was more aggressive in the last fight and started to go to the body. Sure, he couldn't execute it well but still got up the floor and dropped Fury in the third fight, not started a chicken dance. I am sure a "decent fight" would do better, but Whyte ain't that "decent fighter" we had hoped he would be for tonight's fight. Whyte, it seems, either had no plan or did not even come close to executing it if they had one. Honestly, I thought Whyte would give Fury a harder fight and I also said that in the forum but he turned up showing zero improvements or game plan.

The depths of creativity that Eddie's brigade will go to defend him... If I had that dedication I could colonize freakin Mars!!! With Tuberculosis Patients! You see its really simple... Wilder was hit with inferior punches... If Fury had really hit him it would have been worse than Whyte!!! Got that? Can I get you a malted with that shiat sandwich.

[Sid-Knee]

None of that changes the fact Wilder knocked Fury down for a 15 count in the first fight that somehow came out to “8” with that biased backward-counting ref.

Even after all this time, and many people telling others to look at the actual clock on the screen to see how long Fury was down for, we still have people like you.

It doesn't matter what i say to you, it wouldn't get through to your head. So i won't bother.

Enjoy the rest of your night.

[Sid-Knee]

Oh sid.... you come here in damage control mode... and Im trying to figure out where this is going... I mean Fury is a Brit, that should make you happy happy . So Im waitin for "the angle." What is Sid here to protect? And whamo! there it is.

Folks Wilder may have lost to Fury? But he lost against sub standard punches... not the real kind like what he hit Whyte with!!! Is that it Sidney? lol. Talk about ridiculous... You have to be fckin kidding me. Look at the tripe you are asking people to swallow... I implore thee!!

Are you saying you can read an uppercut the same way with any other punch? You really can't. Not one that is set up good.

Whyte wasn't bothered by any of the straights. Wilder wouldn't be able to get hit in the same way with the uppercut by the fact he's as tall as Fury is. Whyte isn't. It's completely different. But when Fury hit Wilder with the straights, you saw what happened.

Who is doing damage control? Haha. I just don't like it when people twist the truth due to either spite or agenda. I've told you enough times. But you seem to think otherwise.

Simple question: Has wilder ever taken the kind of shots Whyte did when facing AJ? And did he take as many of them?

[billeau2]

Even after all this time, and many people telling others to look at the actual clock on the screen to see how long Fury was down for, we still have people like you.

It doesn't matter what i say to you, it wouldn't get through to your head. So i won't bother.

Enjoy the rest of your night.

Actually his reply is a perfect example of where the twisted logic employed will go... Now everyone can make assertions qualifying the quality of the beatings employed... Nice huh Sid? So how exactly do we determine that the punches that hit Wilder did not affect Whyte? and what does it even matter? Unless someone has some reason to stick it to Wilder and make excuses for Whyte.

Wilder was more competative with Fury than Whyte... deal with it. Doesn't mean much really... Trying to say otherwise is ridiculous....r i d i c u l o u s.

[billeau2]

Are you saying you can read an uppercut the same way with any other punch? You really can't. Not one that is set up good.

Whyte wasn't bothered by any of the straights. Wilder wouldn't be able to get hit in the same way with the uppercut by the fact he's as tall as Fury is. Whyte isn't. It's completely different. But when Fury hit Wilder with the straights, you saw what happened.

Who is doing damage control? Haha. I just don't like it when people twist the truth due to either spite or agenda. I've told you enough times. But you seem to think otherwise.

Simple question: Has wilder ever taken the kind of shots Whyte did when facing AJ? And did he take as many of them?

Regarding the analysis of the blows... so what? What truth is being twisted? Giving Wilder credit for fighting Fury? Why even compare?

YOu and I have no idea about what Whyte's taking of the blows from Joshua. The only thing we can say for sure is that Whyte was competative and fought a great fight against AJ. Obviously the blows were effective, as were the blows that dropped Wilder from Fury were effective.

There is simply no reason to compare this... Its not something we can know, unless we felt those blows.

[Sid-Knee]

Actually his reply is a perfect example of where the twisted logic employed will go... Now everyone can make assertions qualifying the quality of the beatings employed... Nice huh Sid? So how exactly do we determine that the punches that hit Wilder did not affect Whyte? and what does it even matter? Unless someone has some reason to stick it to Wilder and make excuses for Whyte.

Wilder was more competative with Fury than Whyte... deal with it. Doesn't mean much really... Trying to say otherwise is ridiculous....r i d i c u l o u s.

Wilder competed and was more competitive than Whyte was in the second Fury fight? Well, Whyte won the first round and made fury fight a cagey fight until the knockout. Fury was winning the rounds, but he wasn't allowed to just go hell for leather. Now, tell me which part of fight two did Wilder compete with Fury? I must have missed that. Thus, making your comment seriously ironic. But like the the dude i replied to in that comment, i won't bother wasting time in explaining it to you. I tried that once with you. Waste of time. I gave you a chance, but it wasn't to be. I'll just sit back and laugh because irony on this level is definitely my thing.