Comments Thread For: Conor Benn vs. Chris Van Heerden Finalized: April 16 in Manchester
Collapse
-
-
While I think Van Heerden is a logical (and very gradual) step in Benn's progression, I do tire of the AB, Hooker, Brook chatter that leads up to Van Heerden.
Rest of the card sounds decent. CBS and McCarthy had a great first fight and I imagine the rematch will be good. Hopefully the winner can rematch Riakporhe.Comment
-
When Boots fought him he was active & fresher and while it didn't go 1 round he took a disgusting beating. It was a ****ty mismatch then and this is no different.
He got his ass beaten so bad in under a round he had to take nearly 2yrs out to recover.
A better version couldn't hang with Boots for a round so obviously people are going too call this for what it is. A farce.
Since he wants to fight Boots leftovers why not give Lipinets a call? He's free I'm sure!
Eddie Hearn would say its great value and a 50/50 fight.
"He beat Lamont Peterson 4 years ago!"Comment
-
-
When Boots fought him he was active & fresher and while it didn't go 1 round he took a disgusting beating. It was a ****ty mismatch then and this is no different.
He got his ass beaten so bad in under a round he had to take nearly 2yrs out to recover.
A better version couldn't hang with Boots for a round so obviously people are going too call this for what it is. A farce.
Since he wants to fight Boots leftovers why not give Lipinets a call? He's free I'm sure!Comment
-
NONSENSE!!!
Comment
-
-
Comment
Comment