Better Win Amir Over Maidana OR Kell Over Porter
Collapse
-
Comment
-
A favorite fight of mine.
Ortiz vs Khan should have happened
I would have favored Vic.Comment
-
Brook! Porter has fought everyone including Spence/Crawford. And nobody has ever beaten Porter like he did and to add to that Porter was closer to his prime.
Which brings me to the question.... When was Porter boxing prime ( not physical) ? Porter definitely improved skill wise after the fight. I'm leaning towards when he fought ThurmanComment
-
Khan was leading for most of the fight, up until round 10 when Maidana made a comeback. But after Khan survived round 10, he recovered and the last 2 rounds were close. But it was too late for Maidana, as Khan was wide ahead on the scorecards.
The first Mayweather-Maidana fight was very close. There were many who even thought Maidana was robbed. Either way, it was much closer than the Khan-Maidana fight. But Mayweather made the necessary adjustments and dominated his second Maidana fight.
Comment
-
Put it this way, I was shocked that Khan managed to beat Maidana with his chicken legs. Totally did not expect him to win, so by that measure, I guess Khan had a 'better' win. On the other hand, Brook beat a more accomplished Porter, but I never felt that Brook was going to get a beat down even if he lost.
So Brook had a more impressive win, Khan had a more surprising win.Comment
Comment