The Dillian Whyte Saga
Collapse
-
-
-
So Ped lost?? What if he wanted a rematch they are 1-1 should they be allowed to keep beating each other for a mandatory belt?? When does it stop and go to someone else??? I mean they could just keep fighting each other for years according to you...
There's some nonsense in here. You seem to be very invested in Dillian Whyte's career to the point where you can't help but show a clear bias (at best).
The first three points seem to really be the same thing. Whyte was ranked one and progressed through Silver and then Interim Champion status. Hearn was lobbying for him to be made mandatory. That's what you'd expect isn't it? If it wasn't Whyte then who should it be? That's his promoter's job.
You then drift into the PED story. Whyte was cleared to fight (and passed other organisations' testing), was never so much as suspended and ultimately was exonerated in an unprecedented statement from UKAD issued due to the leaking of confidential information. The WBC ultimately issued a very similar statement exonerating Whyte completely.
He lost against Povetkin. Then he beat him. I won't counter your opinions around those fights. But they're just opinions. Fighters do lose fights from time to time.
6&7 are the same point dragged out. Now tell me - if the split was presented and agreed at the convention... why was the fight not ordered because Whyte was already in arbitration with the WBC over the split?
Don't you think those conversations might have already happened?
You all some weird @ss dudes....Comment
-
Whyte was cleared after an enquiry and the charge against him was withdrawn.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment

Comment