Can Haney sue the wbc?

[Jsmooth9876]

Sue for what? Kambosos not choosing him as his next fight? The ball was always in the Aussies court and if he chooses someone else, Haney will just have to move along

[champion4ever]

Case for what?

They gave him a fake title that he didn’t even fight for.

A fake title? Then what the Hell do you call a franchise title? Giving a man a free title so he can duck his mandatory challengers; If that's not a fake title then I don't know what a fake title is.

So I guess what you are saying is when Rid**** Bowe vacated his WBC heavyweight title to duck Lennox Lewis then the title was still legitimate even though Lewis never fought for it.

However, when Loma vacated his lightweight title to duck Devin Haney now all of a sudden the title is fake because Haney never fought for it? Such great hypocrisy!

[champion4ever]

This whole situation definitely makes him look bad

Is this the Chinese racist Fists of Fury who hates anything that he deems Afrocentric?

[Mammoth]

No, he doesn't.

Anybody can sue anybody for anything, but that doesn't mean they'll win.

Haney's rights have been respected. What exactly are you proposing he sue for?

The WBC has a large amount of unnecessary titles(Franchise, interim, bridgerweight, etc). Could the ABC come down hard on the WBC like they did the WBA?

[DaNeutral.]

Maybe, maybe not. Is it worth it? All I know is as soon as this Francise BS was very 1st brought in we all said it was a joke and would cause chaos, rows and confusion while that slimy cvnt Maurice raked in a 2nd income.

If Morris wanted to clean this mess up he would just demand Haney v Kambosos, it's really the obvious thing to do, but you see how he doesn't. He's a dirty fkker.

[paulf]

The franchise belt wasn’t made or provide more cash to the WBC... that’s just a bonus.

The franchise belt was created to get the major promoters of this sport out of situations where neither the promoter of the champion or the promoter of the mandatory wanted to let their guy fight on the other guys network, but shelling out insane bids every fight was untenable.

The WBC created a situation where, when this happens, they just declare both guys the champ instead of ordering the fight. They do it in a way that creates confusion on purpose, so that one of the belts can’t just be dismissed like ones in the past.

And let me be emphatic here: the promoters and networks LOVE it. Too Rank loves it. PBC loves it. Golden Boy loves it. DAZN, ESPN, etc love it. Publicly they have to pretend to be upset about it, but in reality this is exactly what they want.

Stop being fooled here - this is what everyone in the business wants to happens... the fighters are an afterthought.

[PeepeePoopooMan]

Is this the Chinese racist Fists of Fury who hates anything that he deems Afrocentric?

Lmao wtf. I like Haney. I like you too. Merry Christmas bruh

[buddyr]

yes!! He was paying sanctioning fees for being the WBC champ and then all of a sudden, they tell him, "you never were champion". I'm no lawyer, but that sounds like a slam dunk case to me.

[The3]

Why did you agree to take that belt in the first place why not tell the WBC no give me the Loma fight at the time

[WBC WBA IBF]

yes!! He was paying sanctioning fees for being the WBC champ and then all of a sudden, they tell him, "you never were champion". I'm no lawyer, but that sounds like a slam dunk case to me.

When did they say he wasn't champion?