He has been asked in interviews. He starts getting flustered, and going on about people not giving a new concept a chance. What he doesn't get though, is that its his concept, not others. The other organizations don't recognize franchise as part of undisputed. Only Sulieman. So he's kinda out voted and overstepping his authority.
Comments Thread For: WBC Boss Attempts to Clarify Franchise Designation; Says Kambosos Should Be Regarded As 'Undisputed'
Collapse
-
So to be clear, if Kambosos and Lopez before him are undisputed, then that means that both Josh Taylor and Canelo are not undisputed as they don't have franchise belts. They only have real world titles, the ones that do mandatories. Who's the franchise champs in those divisions, so they can go and try to become undisputed?Damn, the history books need changing, because Mauricio disagrees and he's the Godfather of Boxing. Man, Canelo is gonna be pissed.Comment
-
Comment
-
This is very easy. Kambosos beat Teofimo lopez who beat Lomachenko. Kambosos beat the main man to become the main man. Who did Devin Haney beat to win that “belt”? NOBODYComment
-
Comment
-
Reason: Franchise designation is NOT recognized by other 3 Orgs, WBC title IS (Haney). Check their (WBA, IBF, WBO) rankings!
Franchise champ CAN fight for the other 3 belts but it's not unification, just like IBO champs.
As I said to some other guy, why are u sticking your nose into matters you're unable to understand?Comment
-
Basically if WBC did not create franchise belt , Haney would not be a "champion", because obviously he did not fight champion caliber guy for it. Case close. Kambossos is the only true Champ!Last edited by MrShakeAndBake; 12-25-2021, 12:19 PM.Comment
Comment