Comments Thread For: WBC Boss Attempts to Clarify Franchise Designation; Says Kambosos Should Be Regarded As 'Undisputed'

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rodtang
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2021
    • 3310
    • 1,519
    • 1,934
    • 0

    #21
    Originally posted by James Hunt
    It's surprising that there is not even one of these "reporters" capable of asking this crook a simple question - how can Franchise WBC champ become undisputed if Franchise designation CAN'T be UNIFIED with other 3 major titles (WBA, IBF, WBO)?
    He has been asked in interviews. He starts getting flustered, and going on about people not giving a new concept a chance. What he doesn't get though, is that its his concept, not others. The other organizations don't recognize franchise as part of undisputed. Only Sulieman. So he's kinda out voted and overstepping his authority.

    Comment

    • Rodtang
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2021
      • 3310
      • 1,519
      • 1,934
      • 0

      #22
      So to be clear, if Kambosos and Lopez before him are undisputed, then that means that both Josh Taylor and Canelo are not undisputed as they don't have franchise belts. They only have real world titles, the ones that do mandatories. Who's the franchise champs in those divisions, so they can go and try to become undisputed?Damn, the history books need changing, because Mauricio disagrees and he's the Godfather of Boxing. Man, Canelo is gonna be pissed.

      Comment

      • Liondw
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Oct 2010
        • 5948
        • 1,867
        • 34
        • 23,904

        #23
        What is Sulaiman saying? Using many words to cover up a silly franchise belt situation.

        Comment

        • WBC WBA IBF
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2008
          • 1123
          • 305
          • 0
          • 61,791

          #24
          Originally posted by champion4ever
          None of the great boxing historians or scholars have ever considered Teofimo Lopez an undisputed champion and neither is Geroge Kambosos
          ESPN, Yahoo, CBS, FOX, Sporting News, Sports Illustrated, The Athletic, etc all say he's undisputed.

          Comment

          • Nash out
            BoxingScene Hall of Fame
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Nov 2018
            • 5860
            • 2,098
            • 1,777
            • 19,416

            #25
            Replace all the alphabets with the Nash belt. One Nash in each division. HW Nash - Tyson Fury. 147 Nash - Crawford, etc. Nash out.

            Comment

            • paulf
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Sep 2009
              • 23701
              • 3,325
              • 2,094
              • 1,052,140

              #26
              You can’t make this **** up.

              Comment

              • mexiFistology
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Jun 2021
                • 437
                • 212
                • 42
                • 0

                #27
                This is very easy. Kambosos beat Teofimo lopez who beat Lomachenko. Kambosos beat the main man to become the main man. Who did Devin Haney beat to win that “belt”? NOBODY

                Comment

                • P to the J
                  GAARR-bidge DAAY!
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jul 2018
                  • 2731
                  • 1,246
                  • 2,379
                  • 9,102

                  #28
                  Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF

                  The WBA has had super and regular world champions for over 20 years now. The WBC is doing the same thing.
                  Not dis*****g that, but this is about the WBC, hence I haven’t mentioned the WBA (this time!)

                  Comment

                  • James Hunt
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Aug 2018
                    • 3539
                    • 785
                    • 1,183
                    • 34,885

                    #29
                    Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF

                    Franchise is already unified with the WBA, IBF and WBO. WTF are you talking about?
                    Only WBC title (Haney) CAN be unified.
                    Reason: Franchise designation is NOT recognized by other 3 Orgs, WBC title IS (Haney). Check their (WBA, IBF, WBO) rankings!
                    Franchise champ CAN fight for the other 3 belts but it's not unification, just like IBO champs.

                    As I said to some other guy, why are u sticking your nose into matters you're unable to understand?

                    Comment

                    • MrShakeAndBake
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Dec 2017
                      • 2334
                      • 427
                      • 719
                      • 29,021

                      #30
                      Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF

                      He doesn't have a pretend belt. He's the WBC world lightweight champion. It's not his fault the WBC created a Franchise world lightweight championship.
                      Basically if WBC did not create franchise belt , Haney would not be a "champion", because obviously he did not fight champion caliber guy for it. Case close. Kambossos is the only true Champ!
                      Last edited by MrShakeAndBake; 12-25-2021, 12:19 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP