Can anyone name Furys top 5 opponents for me?

[Kzbox]

A quick take on Wlad vs Fury -
Fury did nothing, Wlad did less.
Fury ''won'' be default.

Because Fury wouldn’t let him do **** he was moving all over the shot feints were on point bewildered Wlad who has never fought anybody like Fury as i said AJ is like a block of wood so obviously he could land when he wanted so there would be more action. Fury did what he had to do to beat a 10 year old champ in his own country end of story, did i say he beat the **** out of him/put on a masterclass? No I didn’t i simply said he did enough to win and the achievement is better than anything AJ has done so far unless he beats Usyk.

[BodyBagz]

Because Fury wouldn’t let him do **** he was moving all over the shot feints were on point bewildered Wlad who has never fought anybody like Fury as i said AJ is like a block of wood so obviously he could land when he wanted so there would be more action. Fury did what he had to do to beat a 10 year old champ in his own country end of story, did i say he beat the **** out of him/put on a masterclass? No I didn’t i simply said he did enough to win and the achievement is better than anything AJ has done so far unless he beats Usyk.

You're a Fury fan to your soul.

Take care

''Bellyaching''

[Kzbox]

You're a Fury fan to your soul.

Take care

''Bellyaching''

Idiot with a clear agenda gtfoh why even start a debate then dismiss it when it’s not going your way? Nothing i have said has been sucking Fury off just stating facts which you haven’t disproved not once. Have fun with your celebrity boxing maybe Triller is more your sort of thing check it out.

[thetruthteller]

What a bait thread with a clear bias/agenda from the start. Started for no other reason than to piss on Fury lol his resume isn’t very good tbh but neither is anybody’s in the heavyweight division including AJ, never understood why AJ gets so much respect for his resume when all the “names” were past it by the time he got there including a 2 year layoff Klitschko, his only true credible wins is the 1 - 1 andy ruiz and the whyte fights other than that his resume doesn’t impress me.

Not a bait thread at all. I asked a question because if everyone is hailing Fury as the best, then why is his resume so thin? Why call him the best while he has feasted on tomato cans and bums while only really having Wilder and an older Klitschko on his record? Where is the proof that he is the best? All or most of AJ's opponents in the past 5 years have been top 10 or top 20 opponents. Meanwhile Fury has fought 3 guys who do not even box any more. And he wanted to fight another tune up now but the WBC finally forced him to act like a champion and fight a damn mandatory.

[thetruthteller]

i can't believe nobody listed tyson fury since he punched himself in the face. but i just skimmed the thread so maybe someone did.

This may be the best comment I've read on here hahahah. Didn't think of that one but yeah, Fury didn't even have the power to knock HIMSELF out haha

[ELPacman]

The reality is Fury beats anyone. I know Joshua fans like to bring up Pulev, Povetkin, Martin, Parker, etc, but let's be honest, none of the give Fury much of a fight.

Wilder 3x
Prime Wlad
Chisora 2x
Wallin
Cunningham - when he was just stepping up from domestic level

That's 8 very good wins, or 7 wins and 1 draw with the Wilder robbery. Nash out.

No, but he needs to prove it. I HATE when people say this. It is giving a pass to a fighter practically in fear that if he does face X opponent, he just might lose to him if he doesn't take him seriously enough or basically doesn't show up that night. Listen, we can agree that Fury SHOULD beat X opponent, but he really has to go out and prove it. Perhaps, he goes on and fights Dillian Whyte and the dude lands a mother of a hay maker that nobody saw coming, the game changes right there.

I also would like Fury to fight more often to really state his case. If according to this forum, Wilder was and is a bum, that's 3 fights against a "bum" and then making his best win, Wlad that was I forget how many years ago. At this point I'm seeing that AJ probably does have the better overall resume. Would AJ win against Fury? Proooobably not? Though, I want to see it to prove that. I will not just accept Fury beats everyone, so let's not actually make him face anyone.

[Kzbox]

Not a bait thread at all. I asked a question because if everyone is hailing Fury as the best, then why is his resume so thin? Why call him the best while he has feasted on tomato cans and bums while only really having Wilder and an older Klitschko on his record? Where is the proof that he is the best? All or most of AJ's opponents in the past 5 years have been top 10 or top 20 opponents. Meanwhile Fury has fought 3 guys who do not even box any more. And he wanted to fight another tune up now but the WBC finally forced him to act like a champion and fight a damn mandatory.

Same way Crawford is p4p top 3 despite having one of the worst resumes in boxing i guess it’s the eye test aye there was an agenda because there’s soo many top boxers with thin resumes but you go for Fury and seems like you hate on a regular, I don’t care that much tbf even though I’m a fan it’s just obvious what you are doing. He also beat Chisora when he was a top 10 prospect and undefeated so that’s a good win too cant use the excuse he lost down the line as evidence to the contrary or you can do that with any boxers resume who went on to get several losses Chris Byrd comes to mind. All of AJ’s opponents had no business being top 10 as 40 year old ghosts of themselves same way Chisora is classed as a top 10 with 13 losses still today that **** is just made up to a certain extent. That Pulev/Aj was one of the most pathetic displays I’ve ever seen in boxing Pulev was like an amateur yet AJ still struggled to get the job done. Overhyped media hype job is AJ Fury is overrated too but he’s better than AJ.

[Toffee]

What did Rahman ever do besides get lucky vs Lennox?

Lennox was 1-1 vs Rahman. I wonder how he would have done in 3 fights vs Wilder

I listed 10 fighters in response to the theory that Fury's resume is better than Lennox Lewis'.

The fact you honed in on Rahman says a lot - this guy isn't in Lewis' top 5 opponents.

Even then, were talking about a two time heavyweight champion. He certainly ranks higher than Chisora, who is third (and last) on Fury's list of credible opponents.

And a quick mention for the 1-1 comment. This isn't ladies tennis where the third set decides. Lewis went in as champion and came out as champion via a rematch. It's how the sport works.

[REDEEMER]

I listed 10 fighters in response to the theory that Fury's resume is better than Lennox Lewis'.

The fact you honed in on Rahman says a lot - this guy isn't in Lewis' top 5 opponents.

Even then, were talking about a two time heavyweight champion. He certainly ranks higher than Chisora, who is third (and last) on Fury's list of credible opponents.

And a quick mention for the 1-1 comment. This isn't ladies tennis where the third set decides. Lewis went in as champion and came out as champion via a rematch. It's how the sport works.

That poster also noted that losing multiple fights means your done . When I pointed out Lewis had lost as well as AJ in early stages on another thread among others like Klitschko and Joe Lewis had he had to re-educate himself . I really don’t get these new guys who use losses as an ending ,it shows how new they are .

[Boxing-1013]

I listed 10 fighters in response to the theory that Fury's resume is better than Lennox Lewis'.

The fact you honed in on Rahman says a lot - this guy isn't in Lewis' top 5 opponents.

Even then, were talking about a two time heavyweight champion. He certainly ranks higher than Chisora, who is third (and last) on Fury's list of credible opponents.

And a quick mention for the 1-1 comment. This isn't ladies tennis where the third set decides. Lewis went in as champion and came out as champion via a rematch. It's how the sport works.

Whatever you AJ fans have to tell yourselves lol. Fury has a number of fights vs top opposition. No one sh.its on Ali for 3 fights vs Frazier or Norton. You don't purely go by opponent.

If you face a guy a number of times, you credit all of those fights.

Why is that important? Because some guys will go 1-1 even against some like Rahman. Going 2-0-1 against Wilder is extremely impressive.

Ask AJ, he would know. He would be lucky to get 1 win in those 3 fights.