Comments Thread For: Kambosos: Haney, Davis, Lomachenko, Garcia - They're All Going To Get It!

[Rodtang]

But America is where you go if you want to be recognized as the best. Mexicans do it, Europeans do it, Filipinos do it etc.

I don’t mind a fight or two fine but he sounds like he wants to keep every fight at home dude barely sc****d by a win against a guy who was legitimately ill with bad lungs(verified by Espn) and now he’s acting all diva ish already. Smh not a good sign.

and by the way **** Floyd I could care less about that clown.

Your blowing this every fight thing out of proportion. Common sense tells you he will still do some fights in America. Because of money. That's why fighters go. America has nothing to do with getting recognised as the best. Its who you beat that takes care of that, not where you fight them.

[Rodtang]

Kambosos is an arrogant hoodlum, he's not particularly charismatic or witty with the arrogance either, he started wearing thin before he even beat Lopez, can't wait till someone finishes him off, if Lopez had like 1% more stamina in the 10th that would already have been the end of Kambosos.

And yet he still beat Lopez. So good for him.

[Rodtang]

Lol imagine he whips them all and goes down as the biggest surprise in the history of the sport

The emperor might just whip the 4 kings lol.

[ShoulderRoll]

Odd comments from a Canelo superfan

Huh?

Canelo doesn't hold titles hostage and has never won a fight on the cards when he should have clearly lost.

[Boxing-1013]

Huh?

Canelo doesn't hold titles hostage and has never won a fight on the cards when he should have clearly lost.

"now someone will have to ko him to get a fair shake"

It's obvious Canelo for most of his fights, you would have to KO him to get a W. You guys ignoring the obvious, and defending ridiculous sh.it is really pathetic man.

[ShoulderRoll]

"now someone will have to ko him to get a fair shake"

It's obvious Canelo for most of his fights, you would have to KO him to get a W. You guys ignoring the obvious, and defending ridiculous sh.it is really pathetic man.

Everybody has gotten a fair shake against Canelo. Just because a couple of fights were close doesn't mean "you would have to KO him to get a W."

Just ask Floyd.

[Jab jab boom]

I’d only pick Kambosos to beat Garcia out of that group.

[Oregonian]

"Nahila?' Where the feck is 'Nahila?'

————-
Auto correct changed Manila to that. I should have re-read my post.
Now that we’ve cleared that confusion, perhaps the main question can be answered?

[Boxing-1013]

Everybody has gotten a fair shake against Canelo. Just because a couple of fights were close doesn't mean "you would have to KO him to get a W."

Just ask Floyd.

Let me ask you a couple questions.

Is there anything regarding Canelo that you criticize him for?

And is there anything that you go against the general narrative about him? Or a 50/50 thing where you take the other side? Like did you have him losing to Lara, or GGG twice etc.

[ShoulderRoll]

Let me ask you a couple questions.

Is there anything regarding Canelo that you criticize him for?

And is there anything that you go against the general narrative about him? Or a 50/50 thing where you take the other side? Like did you have him losing to Lara, or GGG twice etc.

I was critical of the whole Franchise Champion thing. And when he beat Rocky Fielding I did not consider that to be winning a real title in the 168 lb weight class.

I don't go with the general narrative about him. I go by my own observations of his career.