Why do Canelo fans get so combative when someone says GGG won both fights

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Curt Henning
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Mar 2017
    • 11440
    • 551
    • 24
    • 176,018

    #11
    Originally posted by Boxing-1013

    ? So Teddy Atlas should never watch boxing again and should be shot? He had it 8-3-1 for GGG.

    Like I said, in Vegas, GGG was 1 round away, on 2 judges cards, from getting a draw. He was 2 rounds away, on 2 judges cards, from getting a win. With the official judges, in Vegas, for a Canelo fight lol. That tells everyone what they need to know about who really won that fight. To say that GGG had no basis to win the 2nd fight is INSANE. You people are nuts lol.

    That's all Canelo fans do when grading those fights - 'well Canelo fought Mexican style so he won' - uh what lol. You guys have to try and make up scoring systems to get him a win. It's hilarious.
    im not one of "you guys"...at all....go through any canelo slurping thread and you wont find me...im not one of those guys.....im not "you people"

    yeah golovkin asked for a different fight the 2nd time and canelo not only obliged he did it better than golovkin...and he won...clearly.......but continue making excuses for a loser who has never done anything really noteworthy other than knocking guys like curtis stevens silly....heres a hint...curtis stevens was beaten by two D level club fighters......the two fighters he did beat that were good he barely beat and many felt he lost....and he didnt rematch them....and he only really fought them because canelo/HBO told him to.....hbo wouldnt do canelo/golovkin unless golovkin fought jacobs...and he only fought chenko cause nelo told him "go get a belt and maybe ill fight you".....golovkins career has been a disappointment....face reality

    Comment

    • The Big Dunn
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 70332
      • 9,963
      • 8,224
      • 287,568

      #12
      Originally posted by Boxing-1013
      Virtually everyone agrees that GGG won the first fight.

      The 2nd fight, I scored very similar to the first. GGG just outworked Canelo similarly to the first fight. He was too active.

      The scorecards in the 2nd fight, were enough to BARELY give Canelo a win. One round different on either of the 7-5 Canelo cards, and you have a draw.

      We all know Canelo gets great cards in his fights, with the Vegas judging.

      Basically, someone saying that GGG won both fights is (not only obvious imo) but very reasonable.

      But if you make that comment that GGG won both cleanly, you have all these crybaby Canelo fans coming at you like you just ran through their neighborhood yelling something about their fat mom or something.
      I think it’s because you can make a case he won the 1st fight but the 2nd one not so much.

      The better question is why cant ggg fans accept that he lost the 2nd fight?

      Comment

      • Boxing-1013
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Sep 2017
        • 6988
        • 1,098
        • 2,619
        • 57,573

        #13
        Originally posted by Curt Henning

        im not one of "you guys"...at all....go through any canelo slurping thread and you wont find me...im not one of those guys.....im not "you people"

        yeah golovkin asked for a different fight the 2nd time and canelo not only obliged he did it better than golovkin...and he won...clearly.......but continue making excuses for a loser who has never done anything really noteworthy other than knocking guys like curtis stevens silly....heres a hint...curtis stevens was beaten by two D level club fighters......the two fighters he did beat that were good he barely beat and many felt he lost....and he didnt rematch them....and he only really fought them because canelo/HBO told him to.....hbo wouldnt do canelo/golovkin unless golovkin fought jacobs...and he only fought chenko cause nelo told him "go get a belt and maybe ill fight you".....golovkins career has been a disappointment....face reality
        You guys are nuts lol

        Comment

        • Boxing-1013
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Sep 2017
          • 6988
          • 1,098
          • 2,619
          • 57,573

          #14
          Originally posted by The Big Dunn

          I think it’s because you can make a case he won the 1st fight but the 2nd one not so much.

          The better question is why cant ggg fans accept that he lost the 2nd fight?
          So in Vegas, with 2 7-5 Canelo cards, and one 6-6 card, you can't make a case that GGG won? lol

          One of your dumbest comments Dunn. And that is saying a lot!!! lol

          You guys are insane/pathetic.

          Comment

          • Mammoth
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2016
            • 35717
            • 3,848
            • 3,389
            • 378,304

            #15
            I have no issue with it. I thought he won both as well but rarely do these people have Golovkin losing either fight to Jacobs or Derevyanchenko. They're not calling for rematches to those fights let alone trilogies.

            Comment

            • TernceBudCharlo
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Dec 2020
              • 5757
              • 1,723
              • 174
              • 34,655

              #16
              Originally posted by Mammoth
              I have no issue with it. I thought he won both as well but rarely do these people have Golovkin losing either fight to Jacobs or Derevyanchenko. They're not calling for rematches to those fights let alone trilogies.
              I had both Jacobs and dervechenko beating Glolovkin but Glolovkin winning both Canelo fights. All these wins are with controversy, anyone with a controversial win should want to return to the scene of the crime and right the wrong. I also had Lara beating Canelo. I had Canelo beating Trout but you could make a case for Trout which Is why I always thought they needed to run that back.

              Comment

              • ShoulderRoll
                Join The Great Resist
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 56355
                • 10,193
                • 5,035
                • 763,445

                #17
                Why do Golovkin fans get so butthurt when someone points out that Brit and Mexican tv had Daniel Jacobs winning their fight?

                Comment

                • Curt Henning
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Mar 2017
                  • 11440
                  • 551
                  • 24
                  • 176,018

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Boxing-1013

                  You guys are nuts lol
                  the people who constantly defend the fraud golovkin are the true nuts.....his career is a disappointment....hes not an ATG...not even close...but fgts like you swore hed end canelos career if canelo ever grew balls...you swore he beat any ATG MW in hypotheticals....yet he can barely beat jacobs and chenko...lol...you are the true nut

                  Comment

                  • Mammoth
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2016
                    • 35717
                    • 3,848
                    • 3,389
                    • 378,304

                    #19
                    Originally posted by TernceBudCharlo

                    I had both Jacobs and dervechenko beating Glolovkin but Glolovkin winning both Canelo fights. All these wins are with controversy, anyone with a controversial win should want to return to the scene of the crime and right the wrong.
                    It bothers me. No way should someone have him winning all of those fights. Some people will always go hard for their guys though.

                    Comment

                    • Boxing-1013
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Sep 2017
                      • 6988
                      • 1,098
                      • 2,619
                      • 57,573

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Mammoth
                      I have no issue with it. I thought he won both as well but rarely do these people have Golovkin losing either fight to Jacobs or Derevyanchenko. They're not calling for rematches to those fights let alone trilogies.
                      Well Jacobs wasn't really close. You yourself scored the fight to GGG when you first watched it, so I don't see how you can have an issue with anyone saying GGG won that fight. And you have to go with your original score with a fight.

                      Derevy was close. No doubt about that. He could match GGG's output, that's what made that close, and the Canelo/Jacobs fights not close.

                      If Jacobs was wanting a rematch I might be inclined to agree with him, but I've never heard that from him either. And he didn't exactly cover himself in glory by not abiding by the weight rehydration limit from the IBF. Hard to give a guy a rematch when they don't play by the rules, and lost pretty clearly.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP