Most people on here have no idea what they are watching

[Boxing-1013]

tell me the special talents

If you don't see it, there is no use trying to explain it. It's like trying to explain to someone about the beauty of a rainbow. It's obvious if you have a pair eyes and a working brain. Or at least it should be.

[Boxing-1013]

Is that you Crawford?

Let me taste those tears

[mxtali]

let me taste those tears. I was reading the RBR thread and the patheticness of Canelo fans was so palpable

you’re arguing about canelo vs ggg on a crawford vs porter thread. rent free lmao

[buddyr]

Lol...he outlanded Canelo in like every round man. It wasn't even really close to be honest. And he closed fight 2 better than Canelo. You could argue he got beat up vs Ouma a little bit; you could argue Sergei beat him up some. But Canelo? I mean it's ****** to say that man. It never happened.

So again, you either have a bias or have no idea what you are watching. Pick one. Derevy was hardly 'sh.it all' - he was a guy like Porter, who gives anyone a hard fight, and who no one really wants to fight. GGG is 40, I don't give 2 sh.its what he does from here on out.

And you wanna know the main reason why? Because of bums like you who can't even give credit where it is due - he beat Canelo twice and people like you don't give him credit for it. So what should he try to please you for. You don't keep it real for him anyway, let him do his thing.

you just stated earlier tonight we shouldn't score rounds by who lands the most punches lol. I seriously can't believe you typed that nonsense.

[buddyr]

you’re arguing about canelo vs ggg on a crawford vs porter thread. rent free lmao

it's all he talks about. it can be a thread about a movie and he finds a way to work it into a conversation

[lizard_man]

It was 5-4 Crawford going into the 10th. If porter would have survived, it was shaping up to be a lopsided fight after the knock downs.

[Boxing-1013]

you just stated earlier tonight we shouldn't score rounds by who lands the most punches lol. I seriously can't believe you typed that nonsense.

Huh? DId your dumbass really not understand my earlier comment? Lol read it again you illiterate fool.

[Boxing-1013]

it's all he talks about. it can be a thread about a movie and he finds a way to work it into a conversation

It's a topical point of discussion, especially when you dumbasses contradict your scoring criteria in every fight. I enjoy calling out the ******ity I see on here. It just so happens a lot of it comes from dumbass Canelo fans and dumbass GGG haters.

[Boxing-1013]

you’re arguing about canelo vs ggg on a crawford vs porter thread. rent free lmao

I called that guy out, because he had this fight wide for Porter, when it wasn't. And his rationale is he was landing more, which he really wasn't. He certainly wasn't landing cleaner.

A recent, huge fight that played out similarly, but even moreso in the favor of the aggressive fighter - were the two Canelo -GGG fights. GGG was more active in those fights, and outlanded Canelo in nearly every round.

But Mr Buddy appears to have a different scoring criteria, essentially he tries to see what he wants to see when scoring a fight. He has no idea what he is looking at.

I was calling that out, using Canelo-GGG as an example. But get your panties in a bunch if you want too sweetie. I enjoy those Canelo fan tears. Only difference I see between Bud and Canelo right now is Bud is probably not on steroids.

[Boxing-1013]

it's all he talks about. it can be a thread about a movie and he finds a way to work it into a conversation

I just especially enjoyed reading your commentary about this fight - about how you scored it, which completely contradicts how you should have scored those 2 fights. It was funny to me.

To be honest I don't know if I've ever seen you actually score any other fights than those 3. Maybe for good reason. You clearly have no idea what you're watching.

You were surprised by the Canelo KO of Plant too I believe?