Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Terence Crawford-Shawn Porter Pay-Per-View Price Set At $69.99 On ESPN+

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
    I love this fight and think it will be good.

    But the undercard is absolutely atrocious. As usual I refuse to spend this much on a PPV only for the main event.

    Drop the price to $50 and I'm in. Otherwise do better when it comes to stacking the card.
    That's my issue as well. If you're going to ask for $70+ on a PPV, it better be some insane main event o don't want to miss or it better be a stacked undercard.

    Crawford and Porter are great fighters but collectively generate alot of buzz. The undercard may end up being entertaining but not any compelling matchups.

    I skipped on Canelo/Plant because of the weak undercard and forgone conclusion of the main event. Most recent PPVs fore were Fury/Wilder II and III and the Charlo doubleheader. Felt they were worth the money I spent.

    Comment


    • #52
      And with that ****ing undercard as well. When will they learn?

      Comment


      • #53
        Porter has a big heart, always gives it his all, and gave Spence quite a tough fight.

        I just don't think this is such a big fight, as I believe Crawford is some level above. But maybe Porter will test him in a way he hasn't quite yet been tested.

        Comment


        • #54
          The PPV won't do well, then that'll be used in the future as an excuse by Arum as to why he can't make more fights with other guys from across the street.

          Comment


          • #55
            Paying $15/person since there'll be a few of us watching ... cant wait to see this

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by _Rexy_ View Post
              MF's are gonna come in here and flame the price, while dropping $70 to watch Tank fight Rollie's unknown, out of shape replacement.
              If anybody flames the price, it's not the actual price they're flaming.

              It's Bob Arum's lying, decrepit ass.

              Comment


              • #57
                these mfers are crazy. GTFOH!!!

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Liondw View Post
                  Porter has a big heart, always gives it his all, and gave Spence quite a tough fight.

                  I just don't think this is such a big fight, as I believe Crawford is some level above. But maybe Porter will test him in a way he hasn't quite yet been tested.
                  Spence is a level above Porter and equal to Crawford in ability. What is your point?

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    20 bucks tops. Boxing PPVs should be priced like a movie since they’re usually a lot worse.
                    Wacked_Out Wacked_Out likes this.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      I pay for Showtime I pay for Espn+.and also DAZN evclusively for boxing. Im even thinking about dropping them if they want PPV for all the good fights. Ive never bought a pay per view. I would though if it were about 30-40 bucks or less. I just cant justify the crazy price every couple weeks. If I had 80 bucks to just constantly fork out on bullcrap on top of what I already pay for the cable extras, I'd personally rather buy a bunch of video games for the family. The entertainment value lasts forever instead of 2 hours. Not everybody has 5 reliable boxing loving friends coming over to drink and split the cost. Even if they did, lots have kids and a wife preventing that.
                      Last edited by Wacked_Out; 11-09-2021, 03:44 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP