I think Froch might have been too much for Canelo imo
Comments Thread For: Carl Froch: I Think I Would Have Been Too Much For Canelo in My Prime
Collapse
-
-
Also, dirrell who faced froch was at his ****ing peak, did you even watch the fight, these guys the dirrells they burnt out like fireflys but they were hot at one point, well andre definetely was, he fought uztageiu(?) like a decade later. irrelevant comparison. can only imagine you're a troll having just seen you're now comparing different versions of glen johnson. so never mind the triangle theory its the fact that these guys fought different versions of these fighters at differents stages of their careers.Comment
-
Comment
-
With Canelo's punch placement, timing, accuracy, speed and power, I think it's safe to say he would have knocked Froch the fk OUT!Comment
-
Froch beat a young inexperience 25yr old Groves.
Dumbass.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Froch would’ve done well against canelo and definitely would’ve won rounds. He was good and very underated. He would be canelo best opponent ever.Comment
-
Callum Smith probably thought the same thing about Canelo’s size .
I don’t think the triangle theories around Smith, Froch and Groves make sense. Smith was drained as eff vs Canelo, Groves was shot to pieces after the Eubank fight injury , Froch significantly damaged Groves in their 2 fights so I do think Froch fought a good/best Groves and Smith fought the ghost of Groves rushing back from an injuryComment
-
Comment