Comments Thread For: Fury vs. Whyte: Hearn Believes a Purse Bid is Most Likely Scenario

[removed]

No way should Fury fight on a Hearn show.

Hearn is the enemy and will use every trick in the book to give Shyte every possible advantage, including paying off judges and refs.

[landotter]

Dillian whyte is the mandatory contender and the wbc has already said after 30 days fury will then have to fight his mandatory if they didn’t get the undisputed usyk fight.
Hearn has every right to talk about purse bids if that’s his views they won’t reach a deal before......but dillian whyte is the mandatory challenger it’s as simple as that

The WBC said Fury would need to fight the winner of the Whyte/Wallin match within 30 days of the conclusion of that bout, which obviously is not a thing. Throw in Whyte having an injury, nothing will be mandated until he is healthy for a fight. Even this article states Hearn "expects" the WBC to order it. so this is all talk until something starts happening. Hearn or anyone else can hope for the best for their pocketbook, but in my opinion this all rests on the money makers shoulders and that is Tyson Fury. He is a cash cow right now. I do not buy the WBC forcing his hand yet. Fury fighting Whyte in a England based monster stadium is a no brainer for all involved, but I am betting Fury will get what he wants.

[Jkp]

So then when Whyte's team loses the purse bid he can pull out of the fight and continue bitching about being mistreated?

Yep. He'll pull out if he loses purse bid. Just like he did to pulev.

There's no way Whyte fights outside the uk, where he has free pass from ukad to take as much dianabol as he wants.

[tokon]

With or without the standard Matchroom Re-Match clause?

[Bum squad]

Fury HAS to fight Whyte if he wants to keep his title; that has been made clear. or he can find the nearest trash bin and dump the WBC and go fight someone else. Those are his options

[Toffee]

The WBC said Fury would need to fight the winner of the Whyte/Wallin match within 30 days of the conclusion of that bout, which obviously is not a thing. Throw in Whyte having an injury, nothing will be mandated until he is healthy for a fight. Even this article states Hearn "expects" the WBC to order it. so this is all talk until something starts happening. Hearn or anyone else can hope for the best for their pocketbook, but in my opinion this all rests on the money makers shoulders and that is Tyson Fury. He is a cash cow right now. I do not buy the WBC forcing his hand yet. Fury fighting Whyte in a England based monster stadium is a no brainer for all involved, but I am betting Fury will get what he wants.

They never said he had to fight within 30 days, just that they had to agree to a fight. Obviously they'd allow extensions if it looked like a possibility. To be fair, they always knew it wasn't going to happen.

I'm still waiting for Fury to be made Franchise Champion just to really crap all over the division.

[Toffee]

Fury HAS to fight Whyte if he wants to keep his title; that has been made clear. or he can find the nearest trash bin and dump the WBC and go fight someone else. Those are his options

I'll guarantee that out of those two options, Fury is looking at option three.

[KP1]

God some of you lot are miserable ****s.

[M312]

With or without the standard Matchroom Re-Match clause?

You don't think Fury will ask for one?

[thack]

I’d be interested to see if Fury tells young Edward to shove his ridiculous rematch clause as I feel Fury knows he can handle Whyte without too many problems and Tyson win or loose would still have the Joshua fight there which would still be bigger than a Whyte rematch as it would be Whyte only screaming for a rematch due to his past failings and unpopularity .Fury or Joshua could call the terms for a Whyte rematch or just leave him and fight …. Each other