If you really felt that way you could have fought him and when you first came back .
Edward's admitted he made a mistake offering Fury a bs contract & because Fury signed a top rank diet contract he out earned Aj the year before china f-ed the world over.
Stop trolling
Furys top end wins were more eye catching when you take into account how dominant he was in them. But AJ has more depth on his resume, especially considering all of his big wins have happened after Fury "retired" the first time.
Well put.
That's the conundrum, do you see Fury's 2 wins against 2 world number 1s for all the belts in theyre own back yards as the underdog. Or Ajs more consistency against average & old former generation fighter's? As better.
All the top 3 have lost my faith now. Fury was my last horse in the race but 7 fight's in 7 year's
There are only two heavyweights that matter for Joshua to face and he’s faced neither while they’re both about to face each other for a third time. Him and Hearn were trying to pretend that they were the HW version of Mayweather and thought that their opponents would desperately take the much shorter end of the stick, which ended up backfiring. Meanwhile, he’s now fighting a blown up cruiserweight who may actually give him hell.
Who wanted to see this fight apart from WILDER fans. The only interest in this fight is if Wilder gets obliterated again and if he loses again should AJ face him? In any case even you can admit AJ has attempted to make the fights with both. BIg money offers you heard the words straight out of DEONTAY fat lips. Anyway it is what it is
Two problems with Fury's statement: Fury has only fought Wilder, who can be considered a fighter in his prime. Other than that his only major scalp is Klitschko, with who A.J had a FOTY with.
What is Joseph Parker? He was unbeaten, had outboxed the enigmatic Andy Ruiz Jr, whom A.J lost to, and then avenged said loss.
He's beaten Whyte, Povetkin, Martin, and Takam, who I would argue were either in their prime or close to it. Parker, Whyte, and Takam without a doubt.
I think fury gets too much credit for wilder and people are taking away the beating that ortiz gave wilder twice before being stopped by him , I also dont think a guy in his mid 30s is considered in his prime all fury beat was to old champs that got complacent
Furys top end wins were more eye catching when you take into account how dominant he was in them. But AJ has more depth on his resume, especially considering all of his big wins have happened after Fury "retired" the first time.
Fury has rewritten history on that Klitschko fight.
It was the equivalent of two sprinters completing the 100 metres in 30 and 31 seconds respectively.
It wasn't dominant. Fury landed about 6 punches a round on a night that Wlad was dreadful. That's a long way from dominant. The fact he dodged his contractually obligated rematch doesn't make it any more dominant either.
Comment