Comments Thread For: Teofimo Lopez Sees 'No Point' in Having Rematch With Lomachenko

[Sid-Knee]

I literally posted you’re judging Tank by his actions. Judge Loma using the same standard.

You’re doing it again. You know he dropped the belt. There were multiple stories on this site and others about it. If you don’t like duckers then how the f-ck are you not upset fro someone that drops a belt to avoid a fight?

He dropped the belt Aug 31, 2019. Covid hit March 2020. Teo fight was much later. He easily could’ve fought Haney between Sept and January.

Stop giving a fighter to I like a pass. Judge them both on their actions.

Loma was in negotiations with Lopez at this time. You know, the fight boxing fans were calling for? Haney wasn't even mentioned until they needed another angle when finding out Loma was chasing Lopez down to sign and get it on.

You're going to have to deal with your bitterness on your own. But i'll see every inch of slander for what it is. As i say, i know your society too well.

[Sid-Knee]

He had a mando defense. There was plenty of time to make that defense and keep the wbc belt between Sept 2019 and January 2020.

When the mando defense was an easy one, Loma made it. When it was a tougher one he dropped the belt. If you have facts then deal with this fact.

No privilege for Loma. He has to earn a title shot now by beating Haney or waiting for the winner of Teo/Haney in a 4 belt unification fight. Back of the line behind Haney.

I did address it. I posted if you think that, you’re wrong but believe what you wish.

So you remembered about saying "No privilege for Loma" now? Well done. You wanted to lie and deny, but you got there in the end. Which is something that doesn't happen all that often.

You stay racist now though, you hear me?

OK, good bye now. Speak to you soon.

[The Big Dunn]

Loma was in negotiations with Lopez at this time. You know, the fight boxing fans were calling for? Haney wasn't even mentioned until they needed another angle when finding out Loma was chasing Lopez down to sign and get it on.

You're going to have to deal with your bitterness on your own. But i'll see every inch of slander for what it is. As i say, i know your society too well.

No he wasn’t. Teo didn’t beat Commey until Dec 2019. He dropped the belt in August 2019. Stop giving him every single benefit of the doubt.

Im only bitter that you’re giving him a pass and that he thinks he can just shoot to the front of the line.

Sorry gotta wait your turn.

[The Big Dunn]

So you remembered about saying "No privilege for Loma" now? Well done. You wanted to lie and deny, but you got there in the end. Which is something that doesn't happen all that often.

You stay racist now though, you hear me?

OK, good bye now. Speak to you soon.

Huh? I literally answered you the first time. I didn’t deny anything. Wtf are you talking about?

You’re clearly drunk and delusional.

[Cypocryphy]

He had a mando defense. There was plenty of time to make that defense and keep the wbc belt between Sept 2019 and January 2020.

When the mando defense was an easy one, Loma made it. When it was a tougher one he dropped the belt. If you have facts then deal with this fact.

No privilege for Loma. He has to earn a title shot now by beating Haney or waiting for the winner of Teo/Haney in a 4 belt unification fight. Back of the line behind Haney.

I did address it. I posted if you think that, you’re wrong but believe what you wish.

Alright Big Dunn. I'm calling you out here. I've had enough of the bull****. Let's get the facts straight here. Devin Haney never, not once, had a mandatory defense option with Lomachenko. You do realize that, don't you? I'm going to assume you don't because if you did, you wouldn't be lying on the forums. I'm assuming that.

Now that you know that Loma wasn't avoiding a mandatory defense of the belt because there was nothing mandatory, are you going to stop with this bull****?

I'm throwing down the gauntlet. If you still believe this ****, then you should prove it. Prove to us that a mandatory defense was avoided. We are ALL waiting.

[Sid-Knee]

No he wasn’t. Teo didn’t beat Commey until Dec 2019. He dropped the belt in August 2019. Stop giving him every single benefit of the doubt.

Im only bitter that you’re giving him a pass and that he thinks he can just shoot to the front of the line.

Sorry gotta wait your turn.

And why was Teo fighting Commey? Because Loma wanted him to at least beat a decent fighter to make it worth his while. That was the plan all along. To anybody being honest and watching the situation unfold, this is the reality. Not what you have in your head for every topic that is American.

[Sid-Knee]

Huh? I literally answered you the first time. I didn’t deny anything. Wtf are you talking about?

You’re clearly drunk and delusional.

You tried to make out the comment was directed at another person. Not directed at Loma.

The only delusional one here, is you. But why change the habit of a life time?

You're not drunk. Just dropped on your head one too many times. Plus being in a cult. On their own, it's a huge challenge in life to overcome. But both of them together? Not a chance for you.

[The Big Dunn]

Alright Big Dunn. I'm calling you out here. I've had enough of the bull****. Let's get the facts straight here. Devin Haney never, not once, had a mandatory defense option with Lomachenko. You do realize that, don't you? I'm going to assume you don't because if you did, you wouldn't be lying on the forums. I'm assuming that.

Now that you know that Loma wasn't avoiding a mandatory defense of the belt because there was nothing mandatory, are you going to stop with this bull****?

I'm throwing down the gauntlet. If you still believe this ****, then you should prove it. Prove to us that a mandatory defense was avoided. We are ALL waiting.

You’ve read the story. It’s been on this site and others. Why do I have to prove something that you and I know happened?

You know what he did. Dropped it right before Haney won the eliminator. Why are you guys trying to use little semantics to absolve a guy you like from doing something you don’t approve?

FYI you’re late on this defense. Daggum tried to use it already. Where he argued Loma dropping the belt 2 days before Haney won somehow validated the move.

He cowardly dropped the belt. Lied about not knowing about the franchise title. Then got caught by fat Dan.

You stop the BS semantics. Hold him accountable. If it was the other way around you’d hold haney accountable.

[The Big Dunn]

You tried to make out the comment was directed at another person. Not directed at Loma.

The only delusional one here, is you. But why change the habit of a life time?

You're not drunk. Just dropped on your head one too many times. Plus being in a cult. On their own, it's a huge challenge in life to overcome. But both of them together? Not a chance for you.

I did no such thing. Dude either you can’t read or you’re just an British cuck imbecile. I’m guessing it’s the latter by this post.

[The Big Dunn]

And why was Teo fighting Commey? Because Loma wanted him to at least beat a decent fighter to make it worth his while. That was the plan all along. To anybody being honest and watching the situation unfold, this is the reality. Not what you have in your head for every topic that is American.

You obviously gave him an excuse for something he wasn’t doing. He wasn’t negotiating with Teo because Teo hadn’t defeated commey.

You are just giving him every benefit of the doubt. Even when you’re proven wrong, you make up another reason.

As I’ve repeatedly posted he had plenty of time to defend if he wanted to. he didn’t because Haney isn’t some easy win. He could’ve defended them fought Teo .