Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Oscar Valdez on Conceicao: You Can't Win a Fight Running Like That!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Corelone View Post
    Valdez went from HOF lock, to crying like a baby. He had more than a slight advantage. Drugs, commission, referee, judges, and he still couldn't win right. He gots excuses too? They took the fairness out of the fight and he's complaining the other guy did something wrong. Take your gift and go away.
    Valdez was a HOF lock?

    Damn, you lot are becoming more desperate and extreme by the hour. Not in this life time or the next was he. Not even close.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

      So you started out being honest, but went back to pathetic nationalist when looking at the bogus BC score cards?

      Not surprising to say the least. It's actually to be expected from you.
      Yup and I’ll honestly take it too! Bi.tch keep crying loser

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

        Valdez was a HOF lock?

        Damn, you lot are becoming more desperate and extreme by the hour. Not in this life time or the next was he. Not even close.
        Lock? No. But he was trending that way. Now had he fought and beat Herring or Shakur and got a win rather than a TR scam payday robbery following a positive for banned substances like he got, then I’d think he’d be a lock.


        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Robi13 View Post

          Yup and I’ll honestly take it too! Bi.tch keep crying loser
          No, the loser is Valdez who was schooled and clowned for 12 rounds and lost big. No single rational person thinks he won. He won 3 rounds on my score card. To support this corruption makes you a loser too.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post

            Lock? No. But he was trending that way. Now had he fought and beat Herring or Shakur and got a win rather than a TR scam payday robbery following a positive for banned substances like he got, then I’d think he’d be a lock.

            His only wins of merit are a past prime fighter in Quigg who looked like shlt being with Roach, and a good fighter in Berchelt. How is that "Trending that way"???

            He couldn't be further from the HOF even if he tried to be. Not at any point was Valdez looking like he was heading there. That's legitimately insane. You need a lot more wins over world class fighters to be there. Valdez never showed me he had the capabilities to come close. He got Berchelt who had serious problems with a fighter who could move. That's why he ducked both Loma and Herring. Berchelt went after ropey fighters who stood in front of him at the tail end of their career in Vargas and Miura. That's all he did. I thought Valdez would lose the second he fought a good world class fighter at 130 who he didn't have a clear stylistic advantage over. Turns out all he had to do was fight a decent fighter to be dominated. This is the end of the road for him i'm afraid. Stevenson will finish what's left of his career. Valdez will become nothing but a stepping stone until he decides he doesn't want to lose for a small pay cheque so retires.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

              No, the loser is Valdez who was schooled and clowned for 12 rounds and lost big. No single rational person thinks he won. He won 3 rounds on my score card. To support this corruption makes you a loser too.
              Valdez is still champ and you’re still crying… loser too? More like you’re the only loser here…. Loser

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Robi13 View Post

                Valdez is still champ and you’re still crying… loser too? More like you’re the only loser here…. Loser
                No, he's someone who has another fighters title, like so many of you do over there. It's called theft. Valdez was so stupid, he made the excuse about the tactics used against him and why you can't win that way. He used the same tactics against Berchelt. Clearly he's not the brightest.

                Valdez should have been stripped of the title. It went against WBC protocol and their contract with VADA. So twice he should have lost the title, but your extreme corruption came into play like it always does. To defend this, is to be a loser. The only thing i lose is braincells reading your f3cking nonsense.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by wrecksracer View Post
                  That's right, you win fights by paying off the judges, ref, and taking PEDs. 117-110? lol.
                  Oh c’mon. It’s a drug with a 20hr half life. The one testing commission is fine with it as long as it’s not taken soon enough to be effective in competition. I’m sure he just used it to make weight. Would you rather the fight was cancelled? You got to watch nothing? Would you rather he didn’t make weight but paid a fine and fought his opponent after being heavier on the scale? Cause that’s what would have happened and it would have a more direct affect on the fight. A guy taking speed for training or making weight then having to go without it for the big fight is not ideal. They just wanted to make a big expose of it and be all dramatic. Yes the point deduction was unnecessary. It was a flagrant foul, but it wasent hard. But if you want to be a hard *ss about the phentamine then you should be a hard *ss about the flagrant foul. This is a sport where a guy can land multiple low blows and get no reprimand. You seriously think a guy taking some phentamine well prior to the fight has more bearing on the fight than low blows? Or slips called knockdowns? Or holding? People who have never taken PEDs are the biggest advertisers for them. They’ve never taken them but if they did they just know they’d be the baddest person on the planet if they did. Stuff costs peanuts, what are all you guys waiting for?

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

                    No, he's someone who has another fighters title, like so many of you do over there. It's called theft. Valdez was so stupid, he made the excuse about the tactics used against him and why you can't win that way. He used the same tactics against Berchelt. Clearly he's not the brightest.

                    Valdez should have been stripped of the title. It went against WBC protocol and their contract with VADA. So twice he should have lost the title, but your extreme corruption came into play like it always does. To defend this, is to be a loser. The only thing i lose is braincells reading your f3cking nonsense.
                    You phucking idiot!!! Valdez knocked berchelt out no judges needed. How can you compare that terrible performance by concenciao to possibly the knockout of the year?! Phucking re.tard

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by Blond Beast View Post

                      Oh c’mon. It’s a drug with a 20hr half life. The one testing commission is fine with it as long as it’s not taken soon enough to be effective in competition. I’m sure he just used it to make weight. Would you rather the fight was cancelled? You got to watch nothing? Would you rather he didn’t make weight but paid a fine and fought his opponent after being heavier on the scale? Cause that’s what would have happened and it would have a more direct affect on the fight. A guy taking speed for training or making weight then having to go without it for the big fight is not ideal. They just wanted to make a big expose of it and be all dramatic. Yes the point deduction was unnecessary. It was a flagrant foul, but it wasent hard. But if you want to be a hard *ss about the phentamine then you should be a hard *ss about the flagrant foul. This is a sport where a guy can land multiple low blows and get no reprimand. You seriously think a guy taking some phentamine well prior to the fight has more bearing on the fight than low blows? Or slips called knockdowns? Or holding? People who have never taken PEDs are the biggest advertisers for them. They’ve never taken them but if they did they just know they’d be the baddest person on the planet if they did. Stuff costs peanuts, what are all you guys waiting for?
                      "Just using it to make weight" is cheating. If he can't make weight legitimately, he should move up a weight class....but then he'd be at a disadvantage. There are weight classes for a reason.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP