Originally posted by Sayithowitisuk
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Hearn: Fury Should Lose Title Status if Wilder Trilogy is Delayed Again
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Sayithowitisuk View Post
He isn't, contract clauses & promoter's are.
You saying rematch clause himself didn't hold up the division for 18 months getting rag dolled then running away from Ruiz who wanted undesputed with Wilder.
31/32 now & stil never boxed a top 2 heavyweight. Has a rematch clauses even with mandatories where rules stating the opposite ate set, coward.
They're all as bad as each other.
- Likes 5
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sayithowitisuk View Post
He isn't, contract clauses & promoter's are.
You saying rematch clause himself didn't hold up the division for 18 months getting rag dolled then running away from Ruiz who wanted undesputed with Wilder.
31/32 now & stil never boxed a top 2 heavyweight. Has a rematch clauses even with mandatories where rules stating the opposite ate set, coward.
They're all as bad as each other.Scotland The Brave
Boxingmean like this.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
-
I agree that a further delay should have him stripped but Wilder needs to be 1 of the ppl fighting for that vacant belt. Wilder v the highest ranked WBC guy..
Comment
-
Wilder and Fury are already dropped from boxrec for in activity. If they postpone again Fury will be stripped of the Ring due to in activity rules.
He should go into recess for the WBC if it's postponed again and then he can get it back when he ever decides to fight again.
Castilo likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment