Comments Thread For: Hearn: Fury Should Lose Title Status if Wilder Trilogy is Delayed Again
Collapse
-
-
Rematch AJ didn't hold the division up. He lost but then won his belts back. That's still 2 fights that happened for fans to enjoy. He then fought Pulev and is on the verge of the Usyk fight. Rematch Fury has tried to get out of the rematch clause that he wanted and then we've had to wait on it going through the court. He should just have fought Wilder at the end of last year and this would have been long done. It wasn't his promoters who decided not to do 3rd Wilder fight, it was Fury. Now we're in the mess we're in. Rematch clause AJ has promoters also and he's not being held back from fighting. Oh wait, he is a bit as he would have fought Usyk back in the spring if it weren't for, No defence Fury ****ing up the whole division. Tells the truth UK.
He isn't, contract clauses & promoter's are.
You saying rematch clause himself didn't hold up the division for 18 months getting rag dolled then running away from Ruiz who wanted undesputed with Wilder.
31/32 now & stil never boxed a top 2 heavyweight. Has a rematch clauses even with mandatories where rules stating the opposite ate set, coward.
They're all as bad as each other.Comment
-
I'll try and explain this to you again as you didn't grasp it the first time. Rematch clause AJ has only had 1 rematch and that was a VOLUNTARY defence. Rematch clause Fury is just about to do the same ( allegedly ).Your right about the rules on mandatory defence with no rematch clause allowed. Well done you. But Usyk and Pulev before him have been offered more money for a rematch to be put in there. So it's up to those fighters if they accept or not. They don't have to. But money talks. And if they beat rematch clause AJ then they know their going to go on to another massive payday. If No defence Fury could provide the same level of payday then I'm sure they wouldn't take the rematch OPTION ( not forced ) and look for a big fight with him. But he can't. So it's a no brainer for these guys, who are just trying to maximize their earnings in a short risky career. Common sense really. Tells the truth UK.
He isn't, contract clauses & promoter's are.
You saying rematch clause himself didn't hold up the division for 18 months getting rag dolled then running away from Ruiz who wanted undesputed with Wilder.
31/32 now & stil never boxed a top 2 heavyweight. Has a rematch clauses even with mandatories where rules stating the opposite ate set, coward.
They're all as bad as each other.Comment
-
Comment
-
I agree that a further delay should have him stripped but Wilder needs to be 1 of the ppl fighting for that vacant belt. Wilder v the highest ranked WBC guy..Comment
-
Wilder and Fury are already dropped from boxrec for in activity. If they postpone again Fury will be stripped of the Ring due to in activity rules.
He should go into recess for the WBC if it's postponed again and then he can get it back when he ever decides to fight again.
Comment
Comment