Thank you! Spot on. I agree 100%. You nailed it.
I thought, all things considered, I was a good boxer and I am confident I could have been a good amateur and maybe even a decent pro, had I not had any medical issues with my eyes. In the boxing gym I went to, the coach there liked me, the guys there liked me. They liked watching me boxing. I would say I was pretty good but can’t know for sure how good because I never made it to amateurs, doctors orders. I am 100% positive that in the sport of boxing, I was the best in my neighborhood. Because I thought this of myself, did that mean to fans that I was ready to face prime Pernell Whitaker? after hypothetically going 20-0 with 20KO’s against debuting fighters, fighters with losing records, fighters with barely winning records, and journeymen fighters who have no other purpose than to make a better fighter look great? I am ready for Vasyl Lomachenko?
A lot of fans don’t seem remotely close to comprehending boxing. There is this thing called advertising yourself. There is this thing called development. There is something called levels like you said.
A fighter beats up a string of C and D level fighters and looks amazing doing it, speaks confidently of himself, and all of sudden he’s ready to fight Artur Beterbiev.
Then of course you have the fans who want to mention boxers with 70-100+ pro fights as a measuring stick. It goes way over their head that in order to accumulate such a large amount of wins, it requires a crap ton of absolute no-hopers. That’s called developing a fighter. When you see a boxer with that many fights, it means they were developed properly. And that’s why they are great. Because they were developed and trained the proper way.
Nowadays boxing fans want prospects/green fighters to have the success of Harry Greb without the development Harry Greb had.
One poster said fans have nothing to do with prospects being ushered in with elites. But it was fan pressure, newspapers, and networks that stopped the whole “85 pro fights vs tomato cans and 15 fights vs decent to elite fighters” way of making a fighter better. Fighters who were getting developed like this faced scrutiny for “padding” their records. In reality, that was not padding, that was development. Making a fighter better, more experienced.
Fighters now need to be 30-0 with 30 KO’s all vs top 10 fighters. And even in those 30-0 records, if the majority wasn’t vs top 3 then your resume is weak according to fans.
I thought, all things considered, I was a good boxer and I am confident I could have been a good amateur and maybe even a decent pro, had I not had any medical issues with my eyes. In the boxing gym I went to, the coach there liked me, the guys there liked me. They liked watching me boxing. I would say I was pretty good but can’t know for sure how good because I never made it to amateurs, doctors orders. I am 100% positive that in the sport of boxing, I was the best in my neighborhood. Because I thought this of myself, did that mean to fans that I was ready to face prime Pernell Whitaker? after hypothetically going 20-0 with 20KO’s against debuting fighters, fighters with losing records, fighters with barely winning records, and journeymen fighters who have no other purpose than to make a better fighter look great? I am ready for Vasyl Lomachenko?
A lot of fans don’t seem remotely close to comprehending boxing. There is this thing called advertising yourself. There is this thing called development. There is something called levels like you said.
A fighter beats up a string of C and D level fighters and looks amazing doing it, speaks confidently of himself, and all of sudden he’s ready to fight Artur Beterbiev.
Then of course you have the fans who want to mention boxers with 70-100+ pro fights as a measuring stick. It goes way over their head that in order to accumulate such a large amount of wins, it requires a crap ton of absolute no-hopers. That’s called developing a fighter. When you see a boxer with that many fights, it means they were developed properly. And that’s why they are great. Because they were developed and trained the proper way.
Nowadays boxing fans want prospects/green fighters to have the success of Harry Greb without the development Harry Greb had.
One poster said fans have nothing to do with prospects being ushered in with elites. But it was fan pressure, newspapers, and networks that stopped the whole “85 pro fights vs tomato cans and 15 fights vs decent to elite fighters” way of making a fighter better. Fighters who were getting developed like this faced scrutiny for “padding” their records. In reality, that was not padding, that was development. Making a fighter better, more experienced.
Fighters now need to be 30-0 with 30 KO’s all vs top 10 fighters. And even in those 30-0 records, if the majority wasn’t vs top 3 then your resume is weak according to fans.
Comment