Those of you who scored the fight for Casimero, explain why?

[thedarkdragon11]

They evened up in some categories but Quadro edged him in aggression... Running without punching isn't tantamount to defense... Very simple...

[billeau2]

There are 4 scoring criterias in boxing:

Effective aggression. Effective being the key word here

Defense

Ring genralship

Hard and clean punches


Which one of them was he better at than Rigondeaux?

I'd also like to remind you that 'not fighting the way I wanted him to fight' isn't a scoring criteria

EASY....

I had Rigo ahead going into round two, but my eyelids were getting droopy, so I see a fight for the next ten rounds where Rigo is countering every shot, hitting hard with his jab, knocks opponent down 3 times! suddenly I hear my dog bark, and I am startled...I score the fight...wouldn't ya know it? I fell asleep and dreamed the whole thing!!

Seriously though I can see your point. And it all truth I am sure judges will think about the fans as a consideration whether this be right or wrong.

[Szef]

Turned the fight off halfway through. Had Casimero up like 5-1.

Easy to score: Rigo wasnt throwing let alone landing. Casimero was landing some grazing blows.

You dont get points for footwork.

Screenshot-20210815-080250.png

[Szef]

nah. Casimero fights like that. He is a hunter and Rigo was the hunted. Rigo was running coz he is afraid of Casi. Casi was the ring general.

the f. Defense is when you try to engage and try then avoid the punches of the other. Not run with no intention to engage. If Running is defense then you can run and not engage then you can win the "FIGHT"? WTF how can you say it is a fight if you dont intend to engae.

How can Rigo be effective if he is not even throwing punches? This is pro boxing and hurt business. You can effective if you hurt your opponent. Casi hurt Rigo more time than Rigo did. He was not even covering up coz Rigo is doing pitty punches. You cant do that in pros

Hard clean puncher for Rigo? haha Suck Rigo's d. hahaha

Screenshot-20210815-080250.png

[Ray*]

When Canelo got the decision over Lara I was delighted, when Froch got the decision over Dirrell I was delighted…. am a sweet science guy but what I saw this early morning wasn’t “Sweet science” I stay up for this BS…

[daggum]

floyd did the same thing vs pac and pac landed all the clean punches. admit it. the onlyyyyy difference is floyd had the political power behind him

[TJ highway]

Tonight Rigo proved he has no business headlining a main event................................Don't even talk about a PPV event!

[BadMedicin3]

I thought I had rigo winning but I was too sleepy, I marked the wrong scorecard

[JulVal]

floyd did the same thing vs pac and pac landed all the clean punches. admit it. the onlyyyyy difference is floyd had the political power behind him

Nope Floyd always lands clean crisp punches and has more activity than Rigo come on!

[Left Hook Tua]

There are 4 scoring criterias in boxing:

Effective aggression. Effective being the key word here

Defense

Ring genralship

Hard and clean punches


Which one of them was he better at than Rigondeaux?

I'd also like to remind you that 'not fighting the way I wanted him to fight' isn't a scoring criteria

Meh

Thats the problem with boxing scoring

Ppl try to score stuff like "ring generalship" and "defense" and "aggression"

Boxing is about landing punches.

Ring generalship, defense, aggression is all about landing more punches and landing harder punches than the other guy.

Keep scoring simple.

Who landed more, landed harder and landed cleaner?

That's who you give the round to.

I dont care about these 2 bozos. They wasted my time.

One idiot running all night, another idiot just following and missing with the same dumb hook.

Who cares?


But if you think rigo landed more punches, harder and cleaner punches, give him the round.

But defense and aggression and ring generalship does not win rounds.

Using those to land more, harder and cleaner does.

Judge punches landed. That's what you judge.