Comments Thread For: Vaccinated Heavyweight Michael Hunter: Vaccines 'A Very Sensitive Topic' Among Boxers

[Monty Fisto]

All you guys that love vaxxine sso much explain in full why these ingredients have been in vaxxines Mercury, Aluminum, Formaldehyde, Nagalase, Squalene, Glyphosate, Polysorbate 80, MSG, Antifreeze, Cadmium, Lead, Glycerin, E-Coli, Sulfates, Antibiotics, Acetone, Neomycin, Streptommycin, Animal and insect blood, viruses, foreign DNA/RNA, Aborted Fetal Tissue, etc

Forgive me for reducing the size of your font, but I think it makes things a little more manageable. I actually applaud that you are trying to bring some critical thinking to the table and I would urge you to continue applying it to both sides of every argument.

I would point out, though, that this is not about loving all vaccines. If I happen to think the tetanus jab is useful for people that work around horses, it does not mean I think everyone needs the tetanus jab. Nor if I get a tetanus jab does it mean I have to automatically vouch for the ingredients of every tetanus jab every produced or, for that matter, every jab every produced.

I think that kind of ideological approach doesn't get us anywhere.

It might be helpful to consider an analogy (please stay with me) with cars. Consider these statements:

Cars are a tool that can help you get from A to B. (true)

All cars are good/all cars are bad (silly)

I shouldn't drive in my car because cars once did not have seat belts (silly)

The most blanket statement that I'm willing to make is: Vaccination is a tool that can help fight disease.

The safety and efficacy data for any available vaccine is published and there to be seen by the individual, as are the list of ingredients.

[saopaulo]

[QUOTE=Monty Fisto;n31027442]

Forgive me for reducing the size of your font, but I think it makes things a little more manageable. I actually applaud that you are trying to bring some critical thinking to the table and I would urge you to continue applying it to both sides of every argument.

I would point out, though, that this is not about loving all vaccines. If I happen to think the tetanus jab is useful for people that work around horses, it does not mean I think everyone needs the tetanus jab. Nor if I get a tetanus jab does it mean I have to automatically vouch for the ingredients of every tetanus jab every produced or, for that matter, every jab every produced.

I think that kind of ideological approach doesn't get us anywhere.

It might be helpful to consider an analogy (please stay with me) with cars. Consider these statements:

Cars are a tool that can help you get from A to B. (true)

All cars are good/all cars are bad (silly)

I shouldn't drive in my car because cars once did not have seat belts (silly)

The most blanket statement that I'm willing to make is: Vaccination is a tool that can help fight disease.

The safety and efficacy data for any available vaccine is published and there to be seen by the individual, as are the list of ingredients.
[/QUOTE

Previous vaccines have NEVER been tested for safety or proven to work. Now this current injection is untested period.





these deaths are from databases that report under 1% so these figures could be 500k toast

[Weebler I]

Interesting thread.

To my mind, whole "vaccine" debate reveals who thinks for themselves, who trusts places trust in authority, who trusts the mainstream media and who is ruled by fear.

Ultimately, it's poison for the body, and it won't protect you.

[aboutfkntime]

...






" I know seven people that got vaccinated and then got COVID "






...

[aboutfkntime]

It was never used on humans. The animals tested on died. Moderna never made any products before this one. Covid is treatable. Blood clots are not. This will stay in your body forever. We have no idea of the future consequences.

this post is far more accurate than some of the garbage posts in this thread

good one bud ^^

why are shltheads spouting garbage that has repeatedly been proven wrong ?

" I know seven people that got vaccinated and then got COVID "






...

[saopaulo]

if they asked u to put a experimental oil in your car would u do it? most people care about their car more than their body

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvsR_WQM210

[Monty Fisto]

Interesting thread.

To my mind, whole "vaccine" debate reveals who thinks for themselves, who trusts places trust in authority, who trusts the mainstream media and who is ruled by fear.

Ultimately, it's poison for the body, and it won't protect you.

Glad you're keeping an open mind then.

[Monty Fisto]

[QUOTE=saopaulo;n31027538]

Forgive me for reducing the size of your font, but I think it makes things a little more manageable. I actually applaud that you are trying to bring some critical thinking to the table and I would urge you to continue applying it to both sides of every argument.

I would point out, though, that this is not about loving all vaccines. If I happen to think the tetanus jab is useful for people that work around horses, it does not mean I think everyone needs the tetanus jab. Nor if I get a tetanus jab does it mean I have to automatically vouch for the ingredients of every tetanus jab every produced or, for that matter, every jab every produced.

I think that kind of ideological approach doesn't get us anywhere.

It might be helpful to consider an analogy (please stay with me) with cars. Consider these statements:

Cars are a tool that can help you get from A to B. (true)

All cars are good/all cars are bad (silly)

I shouldn't drive in my car because cars once did not have seat belts (silly)

The most blanket statement that I'm willing to make is: Vaccination is a tool that can help fight disease.

The safety and efficacy data for any available vaccine is published and there to be seen by the individual, as are the list of ingredients.
[/QUOTE

Previous vaccines have NEVER been tested for safety or proven to work. Now this current injection is untested period.





these deaths are from databases that report under 1% so these figures could be 500k toast

If you say the long-term effects are unproven, I cannot disagree as this is self-evident.

If you say the long-term effects are unpredictable, I say we have enough knowledge to make educated projections but cannot outright disagree.

If you say these vaccines are untested, I'm sorry but this is false. They've been tested in vast, vast numbers and I'm happy to point you to the details if you want it.

[Monty Fisto]

When looking at these numbers for, say, death by venous thrombembolism, you have to be careful to understand what is going on with the data.

1.2 billion people have been vaccinated globally.

It's a lot of people. Let's say the chance of someone suffering spontaneously over the course of a month from venous thrombembolism is 0.015%.

You take a random group of 1000 people, you might expect 1 or 2 of them to suffer from venous thrombembolism over the course of any one month.

You take 1.2 billion people, you would expect 175,000 people to naturally suffer such an embolism. It's not so easy, then, to unpick if the vaccine is playing a part.

(For the record, the CDC estimates such embolisms may naturally occur in 1 for every 1000 people -- maybe as many as 900,000 people per year in the US alone, though this seems high to me : LINK)

[Lance98]

Only a mindless peasant would allow satanist pedophiles to alter their genetics with a "vaccine". COVID does not exist if you turn off your TV.

How does it alter gene? Please explain. Oh wait, you can't...so zip it. Covid don't exist if you turn off your TV? I have lost 2 relatives in new york this year because of it, clown.