Originally posted by Boxing-1013
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Vaccinated Heavyweight Michael Hunter: Vaccines 'A Very Sensitive Topic' Among Boxers
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Ajvar View Post
Fun Fact: study says that COVID lowers IQ and it is written in the Lancet. Any sane person with a gram of knowledge about medicine knows what the Lancet really is.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/e...324-2/fulltext
So.. what were you taking about the idiocy and the irony? Oh yeah: Hope the irony of calling anyone else an "idiot" (while providing nothing but emotional nonsense) isn't lost on you.
fun fact: the vaccine does not stop people from catching or transmitting covid. so being vaccinated does nothing to avoid the risk of "lowering IQ". to make things worse for you, vaccinated people are 6.7 times more likely to catch the delta variant than unvaccinated people with immunity. so you, the vaxxed, are more likely to have lower iqs, since you may have picked up the virus multiple times without knowing, as opposed to the unvaxxed.
i won't even get into how lancet was caught red handed being fraudulent in 2020, or vaers data. but then again, there's probably a shifting of the goalposts incoming, so i'll end up havng to.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View PostMichael Hunter won't quite feel at ease until the veteran heavyweight walks to the ring Tuesday night to battle Mike Wilson. That's the type of impact COVID-19 has made mentally on vaccinated boxers like Hunter, whose fight with Wilson was abruptly postponed June 15, just four days before they were supposed to square off on the Teofimo Lopez-George Kambosos Jr. undercard at loanDepot Park in Miami. Lopez, who was not vaccinated, tested positive for the coronavirus the morning of June 15.
[Click Here To Read More]
Comment
-
Originally posted by that g View Postto make things worse for you, vaccinated people are 6.7 times more likely to catch the delta variant than unvaccinated people with immunity.
So "that g" offers us to decrease chance of infecting by Delta... via getting sick with classic Corona killing 5K people from every million with others getting prolonged negative effects.
The analogy is: Kids who were taught to not drink water with steam (it means it's hot) are 6.7 times more likely to get burn on hot non-steamy milk than those kids who actually got burned with hot water. So lets tell kids to drink boiling hot water so that they would think thrice before taking anything into their mouth again. INGENIOUS!
[FUN FACT] There would be no Delta at all had people took social distance for 4 weeks, wore masks for 2 months and forced 3 weeks quarantine for newcomers to country.Last edited by Ajvar; 08-08-2021, 07:26 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ajvar View Post
Fun Fact: study says that COVID lowers IQ and it is written in the Lancet. Any sane person with a gram of knowledge about medicine knows what the Lancet really is.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/e...324-2/fulltext
So.. what were you taking about the idiocy and the irony? Oh yeah: Hope the irony of calling anyone else an "idiot" (while providing nothing but emotional nonsense) isn't lost on you.
How the Lancet lost our trust
htthttps://www.spectator.co.uk/article/how-the-lancet-lost-our-trust
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ajvar View Post
LMAO! That is another funny lost war with numbers which antivaxers are so happy to loose. People, you get it? He compared vaxed people... with sick people who got cured from the disease! This sht is targeted to those fools who don't read to the last word of anything when they see clickbait.
So "that g" offers us to decrease chance of infecting by Delta... via getting sick with classic Corona killing 5K people from every million with others getting prolonged negative effects.
The analogy is: Kids who were taught to not drink water with steam (it means it's hot) are 6.7 times more likely to get burn on hot non-steamy milk than those kids who actually got burned with hot water. So lets tell kids to drink boiling hot water so that they would think thrice before taking anything into their mouth again. INGENIOUS!
[FUN FACT] There would be no Delta at all had people took social distance for 4 weeks, wore masks for 2 months and forced 3 weeks quarantine for newcomers to country.
That was one datapoint, used to make a narrow point, which your “impacted IQ” obviously caused you to miss. There are other datapoints, such as that vaxxed people contract and transmit just as much as unvaxxed people. So then, because vaxxed people are less likely to show symptoms, they are actually more dangerous to the unvaxxed.
So of course the comparison is between vaccinated people and people with immunity. Thats the data we have, and frankly, THAT’S BEEN THE ENTIRE POINT. The best way to protect people who have never contracted the virus and aren’t vaxxed is immunity, not vaccinated people - vaxxed people still catch and transmit the disease, and may be doing so more than immune people according to latest data
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ajvar View PostMoron pretending to sound "informed" on Covid and failing on every conceivable level
10s of millions in America have FULLY recovered from the Chinese Virus, to the point the recovery rate for literally anyone under 70 is 99.97%, and in a country where half the population is obese no less.
The Whu-Flu is SO deadly, that the first affirmative action President just had a party with hundreds of guests vaccinated and unvaccinated, no social distancing and no masks. So pretty much every ******** that has been trying to force Covid mandates and rules for "normal" Americans...don't follow them themselves. Btw, you "debate" like a gender studies broad. Unfortunately for you sarcasm and rewording someone else's sentence (while adding no facts, logic, or rational thinking) is no substitute for an actual argument.
Comment
-
Originally posted by that g View PostJust stop. You’ve been wrong and misinformed in every post you’ve made so far, with self owns all over the place.
That was one datapoint, used to make a narrow point, which your “impacted IQ” obviously caused you to miss. There are other datapoints, such as that vaxxed people contract and transmit just as much as unvaxxed people. So then, because vaxxed people are less likely to show symptoms, they are actually more dangerous to the unvaxxed.
So of course the comparison is between vaccinated people and people with immunity. Thats the data we have, and frankly, THAT’S BEEN THE ENTIRE POINT. The best way to protect people who have never contracted the virus and aren’t vaxxed is immunity, not vaccinated people - vaxxed people still catch and transmit the disease, and may be doing so more than immune people according to latest data
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxingfanatic75 View Post
Here’s the problem with your statement. Can you tell us what the POTENTIAL long term impacts of this vaccine is? Know why you won’t find that measure or information? Because it hasn’t been out there long enough to inform us. How many drugs have been pushed upon the public only to find out years later it’s maker is locked into a lawsuit of millions because of cancer or deaths? Know something else interesting? All advertised drugs on television by Federal law must disclose drug side effects. If this vaccine is of such importance why are the drug makers not running ads 24/7 on said vaccine? Because they’d have to disclose that information. Polio vaccine has published long term impacts because its been around and tested a long long time.
when this vaccine has been around for 5-10 years and long term impacts are published ill then insert it into my body
Comment
-
Originally posted by that g View Post
you sure about that? about 40 -50% of all cases are among the vaccinated. https://www.businessinsider.com/uk-h...e-delta-2021-7
So, to review, the vaccine was sold as being able to stop the virus in its tracks. you won't need masks, they said. you can move around freely!
But now, not only can the vaccinated still catch covid and still test positive, they can actually transmit the virus. with all the vaccine side effects (which are being suppressed, btw).
So now, imagine a boxer who's taken the vaccine so he could go box, but now has to worry about a slight chance of an enlarged heart, a chance of impacting his competitiveness and athleticism. AND WORST OF ALL, he/she could still test positive and be removed from a fight the day of, EVEN THOUGH he/she has been vaccinated and was supposed to be unable to get sick or transmit the virus. so if the vaccine does nothing to improve a boxers chances of actually fighting and making a living, but rather introduces possible risks, why take it?
if you cannot understand the point here, you're probably part of the reason why vaccine hesitancy is a thing.
If there are 10 people and 9 are vaccinated. If 2 people get covid that means 50% of the cases were vaccinated. But do you notice that 100% of the unvaccinated people got covid in this scenario?
Comment
Comment