Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why did JEFF HORN do such a good job against Pacquiao?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    crawford-horn-compubox-punch-stats.jpg

    pacquiao-horn-compubox-punch-stats.jpg

    But who cares about numbers...

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by BodyBagz View Post

      They score ''dirty'' down undah !

      Ppl keep mentioning it as if it's a good thing
      Dont degrade “dirty boxing” it works. Horns a prime example

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by MONGOOSE66 View Post

        Because people go based off of their eyes. Horn never acted like the great Pac’s punches affected him. People score points for that. Amateur eyes are AMATEUR.
        They should ban punch stats

        Meaningless numbers. Prove nothing.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by MONGOOSE66 View Post

          Dont degrade “dirty boxing” it works. Horns a prime example
          Dirty has a very short self life.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by BodyBagz View Post

            They should ban punch stats

            Meaningless numbers. Prove nothing.
            Pitty pat or ineffective punches should never be scored but thats tuff to do in real time. Judges SHOULD BE EXBOXERS ONLY.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by BodyBagz View Post

              Dirty has a very short self life.
              Really,….. Holyfield, Trinidad, Hopkins utilized it in their program. Dirty boxing ALONE isnt going to get u to the promised land.
              It also adds a degree of a mental battle. It does work. I know

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by MONGOOSE66 View Post

                Pitty pat or ineffective punches should never be scored but thats tuff to do in real time. Judges SHOULD BE EXBOXERS ONLY.
                For the overwhelming majority of the time, those who land more, WIN. There's a very simple reason why that is.

                Landing more ''should'' = W and it does 98% of the time. Even when the judges get it wrong.

                Numbers don't lie. Biases win out sometimes.

                If the can find ex boxers with all of their marbles, I agree.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by MONGOOSE66 View Post

                  Really,….. Holyfield, Trinidad, Hopkins utilized it in their program. Dirty boxing ALONE isnt going to get u to the promised land.
                  It also adds a degree of a mental battle. It does work. I know
                  You mistake dirty for retaliation....except for Hopkins. You got me there.

                  I never considered Tito to be dirty.....

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    I'm just glad all of the fcking hypocrites left, not telling me how they would feel if Horn had the numbers in his favor and PAC WON.

                    Boxing has the worst fans in all of sports.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Even on the ''power/pitty pat'' scale, Pac > Horn !!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP