Comments Thread For: Terence Crawford vs. Shawn Porter is Ordered By The WBO

[ShaneMosleySr]

There’s no irony.

While it doesn’t completely mean Crawford will beat Porter, Crawford destroyed Brook in 12 minutes after Brook outclassed Porter for 12 rounds.

Bringing this up is not insane. It is a logical reason, one of many, as to why someone is rating Crawford above Porter.

What is insane is immediately jumping to a comparison between Muhammad Ali and Shawn Porter.

And that’s why this site never disappoints.

Site never disappoints? But here you are unable to understand what he is clearly pointing out what you are obviously supporting. Using circular logic to come to a clear cut outcome. See the irony here?

[Boxingfanatic75]

There’s no irony.

While it doesn’t completely mean Crawford will beat Porter, Crawford destroyed Brook in 12 minutes after Brook outclassed Porter for 12 rounds.

Bringing this up is not insane. It is a logical reason, one of many, as to why someone is rating Crawford above Porter.

What is insane is immediately jumping to a comparison between Muhammad Ali and Shawn Porter.

And that’s why this site never disappoints.

It’s very much insane! They fought 7 years ago when Brook was in his prime at 28 years old. The Brook Crawford fought is a shadow of the boxer he used to be when Porter fought him. So yes, circular logic was used by the poster and very poorly I might add.

[El_Mero]

Notice that all of Crawford's recent wins, definitely all of 147, are ref stoppages, all but one of which were sketchy.

Crawford doesn't make you take knees for 10, like Spence can.

Crawford don't have you rolling around on the ground holding your stomach in pain, like Spence can.

Crawford has NEVER rearranged a face like this

9c1327bc724cb44838bda5525ee7bc52.jpg

again, you won. That Algieri fight spoke volumes

[Combat Talk Radio]

again, you won. That Algieri fight spoke volumes

Remember, Chris Algieri arguably beat a fresher version of Amir Khan - and didn't need a low blow at the end of it.

So you can discredit all you want, brother.

Fact remains, your guy has no resume at 147, and even that same Algieri you discredit has a better resume than him.

So

[El_Mero]

Remember, Chris Algieri arguably beat a fresher version of Amir Khan - and didn't need a low blow at the end of it.

So you can discredit all you want, brother.

Fact remains, your guy has no resume at 147, and even that same Algieri you discredit has a better resume than him.

So

Never met a guy who cant win with dignity.

[NachoMan]

There’s no irony.

While it doesn’t completely mean Crawford will beat Porter, Crawford destroyed Brook in 12 minutes after Brook outclassed Porter for 12 rounds.

Bringing this up is not insane. It is a logical reason, one of many, as to why someone is rating Crawford above Porter.

What is insane is immediately jumping to a comparison between Muhammad Ali and Shawn Porter.

And that’s why this site never disappoints.

Brook was also doing very well and was arguably beating Spence when that fight got stepped. Not taking credit from Spence because he was the tougher guy on the night, but Brook revealed a lot of flaws in Spence's game. Granted, Spence has certainly improved since then.

[PunchyPotorff]

Originally posted by PunchyPotorff
Wondering why some fans say Crawford will stop Porter. Yes it could happen... but Porter is no easy mark. Spence had trouble with him, and only won a split decision. And BTW... Spence in that close of a fight with Porter... yet fans saying Spence will easily stop Pac?

people are just fan boys the same guys that said charlo beats castano by ko the same guys that said canelo ducking plant are usually the ones talking out of their @$$es...this is a good fight porter is strong and makes fights ugly personally i like that style

Definitely, agreed. Porter may be the best style to test Crawford.

[rickJen]

Any announcement date planned for this fight?

[2ndroundko]

top rank isnt paying for this fight so why would pbc bid when they can just wait for crawford to become a free agent

[Combat Talk Radio]

top rank isnt paying for this fight so why would pbc bid when they can just wait for crawford to become a free agent

Because bidding on a mandatory shows both fighters the value they each bring, and with a 60-40 split Crawford's way, there's really no excuse not to take it.