His resume nobody can touch. His " quality of opposition " by fighters " in their prime " can't be touched. It's actually insane. Then go to Mayweather's list of the " quality " of his opponents that were in their " prime ". It's night and day , Pacman's career as a " fighter " tops Mayweather's by far. I'm not talking money, Mayweather leads in that department.
His resume nobody can touch. His " quality of opposition " by fighters " in their prime " can't be touched. It's actually insane. Then go to Mayweather's list of the " quality " of his opponents that were in their " prime ". It's night and day , Pacman's career as a " fighter " tops Mayweather's by far. I'm not talking money, Mayweather leads in that department.
Start a thread matching resume for resume, fight for fight and we will see how they stack up, it obvious you leave out the fine details of a fight, you like the name-value right lol.
His resume nobody can touch. His " quality of opposition " by fighters " in their prime " can't be touched. It's actually insane. Then go to Mayweather's list of the " quality " of his opponents that were in their " prime ". It's night and day , Pacman's career as a " fighter " tops Mayweather's by far. I'm not talking money, Mayweather leads in that department.
this is the kind of ******ity we have come to know and love from a Pacquiao thread
above 130, Pac only fought the best ONCE... and he LOST
Mayweather's opponent selection is far superior... not even close
When you look at boxing, prospects emerged when he was at his peak and he still outlasted them. If he retired 10 years ago, he would have been a first ballot hall of famer.
People can be critical and engage in the ongoing rivalry but respect must be given where respect is due.
Still breeding new generation of fans. Errol Spence can stop this train before it reaches Crawford. Spence deserved the torch more than Crawford TBH but if he let's this go, Crawford will pick up the carcass and will have the last laugh.
His resume nobody can touch. His " quality of opposition " by fighters " in their prime " can't be touched. It's actually insane. Then go to Mayweather's list of the " quality " of his opponents that were in their " prime ". It's night and day , Pacman's career as a " fighter " tops Mayweather's by far. I'm not talking money, Mayweather leads in that department.
Pacs double and trilogy wins over morales, jmm, bradley and barrera is equal to just about Floyd s entire career. Floyd has only about 9 wins of any importance, and 40 wins whose names don't roll off tongue, ie, unkowns by most people with passing interest in boxing
Was thinking I could read a Pac article without some of the Pac haters dragging themselves in. But as usual they just couldn't help themselves.
And they 'll try convince you Floyd is talked about more? When Pac is talked about its about his unbelievab le achievements and legacy. With Floyd talk, it's about the ducking rematches, no fighting abroad, and making YouTube rs and mma fighters look like elite boxers.
Floyd could have learned a lesson from pac, in that to get as much acclaim as pac you need to take on all comers at all times, and not obsess too much about unbeaten records
His resume nobody can touch. His " quality of opposition " by fighters " in their prime " can't be touched. It's actually insane. Then go to Mayweather's list of the " quality " of his opponents that were in their " prime ". It's night and day , Pacman's career as a " fighter " tops Mayweather's by far. I'm not talking money, Mayweather leads in that department.
Yes it's undeniable that's why boxing legends and boxing aficionados are calling pac the GOAT.
Comment