Comments Thread For: Canelo Spurns Golovkin Again, Prefers To Fight Charlo

[I have no ears]

how the fk did you work that out you idiot ?

I will add the fact that you think I am 20, to your growing list of ******ity

FACT: you embarrassed yourself, and you exposed yourself... when you insisted that ring generalship was the same as, effective aggression, clean punching, and defense... but then blurted out a definition for ring-generalship you had googled, that had nothing whatsoever to do with... effective aggression, clean punching, and defense looooooooool

talk shlt much ?



tenor.gif?itemid=9755587.gif

If you're punching someone clean, showing good defense, and having effective aggression then all of that put together means you're making you're opponent fight your fight, how u can't figure that one out I don't know. And yup I worked it out cos u wildly claimed u started an amateur boxing career in 1981 u dumb f*gg*t, and I'm guessing if that was the case in your g*y fantasy then u would have started around 20 years old roughly, so that would make u 60 odd, now I'm having to go through basic maths with u ffs, go home boy

[I have no ears]

how the fk did you work that out you idiot ?

I will add the fact that you think I am 20, to your growing list of ******ity

FACT: you embarrassed yourself, and you exposed yourself... when you insisted that ring generalship was the same as, effective aggression, clean punching, and defense... but then blurted out a definition for ring-generalship you had googled, that had nothing whatsoever to do with... effective aggression, clean punching, and defense looooooooool

talk shlt much ?



tenor.gif?itemid=9755587.gif

Gone quiet all of sudden? Bout fkn time u shut up haha, 45000 posts on this account and now u need a new one all cos you're so ****** u can't work out dates properly without u painting yourself as an old age pensioner, hahaha what a fkn bellend, oh well atleast on your new account u can create a new backstory and memorize it properly this time, peace out f*gg*t

[aboutfkntime]

If you're punching someone clean, showing good defense, and having effective aggression then all of that put together means you're making you're opponent fight your fight, how u can't figure that one out I don't know. And yup I worked it out cos u wildly claimed u started an amateur boxing career in 1981 u dumb f*gg*t, and I'm guessing if that was the case in your g*y fantasy then u would have started around 20 years old roughly, so that would make u 60 odd, now I'm having to go through basic maths with u ffs, go home boy

it does not you ignorant little shlthead

you just stated that you scored the rematch for Golovkin because of... clean punching, effective aggression, defense... but, FACT: Canelo made Golovkin fight his fight ALL NIGHT LONG... as admitted by Able Sanchez himself... FACT: Golovkin could not get his game going at all...


"So in the fight, I was trying to have Gennady make it a fight. Instead of allowing Canelo to rest, I wanted him to fight more. Obviously, we wanted [Golovkin] to do a lot of different things,” Sanchez said during the post-fight press conference. But when they’re in the ring, they’re gonna do the things that they see available to them. Canelo fought the fight that he needed to fight today to win."


does that sound like Golovkin was fighting his fight, you little spastic... ?????

FACT: Golovkin could not even follow his own gameplan LMAO

idiot, you are talking shlt

and clean punching, effective aggression, defense... do not cover... adapting, taking away your opponents strengths, and out-thinking your opponent... either


FACT: you embarrassed yourself, and you exposed yourself... when you insisted that ring generalship was the same as, effective aggression, clean punching, and defense... but then blurted out a definition for ring-generalship you had googled, that had nothing whatsoever to do with... effective aggression, clean punching, and defense looooooooool


and wait, sooooo... first, you swore black-n-blue that I was 20yo... and now you swear that I'm an old age pensioner...???

which one is it shlthead ?

what garbage are you gonna decide to blurt out tomorrow, shlthead ? loooooool


FACT: you are just another shlthead casual-fan... who has no idea how to score a fight


you are my bltch, I exposed you... go play in traffic phaggot






...

[aboutfkntime]

Gone quiet all of sudden? Bout fkn time u shut up haha, 45000 posts on this account and now u need a new one all cos you're so ****** u can't work out dates properly without u painting yourself as an old age pensioner, hahaha what a fkn bellend, oh well atleast on your new account u can create a new backstory and memorize it properly this time, peace out f*gg*t

waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah


my hero lost.... so now I'm gonna embarrass myself by blurting out garbage on the internet waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah






Funny-Crying-Baby-Face-Photo.jpg

[I have no ears]

it does not you ignorant little shlthead

you just stated that you scored the rematch for Golovkin because of... clean punching, effective aggression, defense... but, FACT: Canelo made Golovkin fight his fight ALL NIGHT LONG... as admitted by Able Sanchez himself... FACT: Golovkin could not get his game going at all...


"So in the fight, I was trying to have Gennady make it a fight. Instead of allowing Canelo to rest, I wanted him to fight more. Obviously, we wanted [Golovkin] to do a lot of different things,” Sanchez said during the post-fight press conference. But when they’re in the ring, they’re gonna do the things that they see available to them. Canelo fought the fight that he needed to fight today to win."


does that sound like Golovkin was fighting his fight, you little spastic... ?????

FACT: Golovkin could not even follow his own gameplan LMAO

idiot, you are talking shlt

and clean punching, effective aggression, defense... do not cover... adapting, taking away your opponents strengths, and out-thinking your opponent... either


FACT: you embarrassed yourself, and you exposed yourself... when you insisted that ring generalship was the same as, effective aggression, clean punching, and defense... but then blurted out a definition for ring-generalship you had googled, that had nothing whatsoever to do with... effective aggression, clean punching, and defense looooooooool


and wait, sooooo... first, you swore black-n-blue that I was 20yo... and now you swear that I'm an old age pensioner...???

which one is it shlthead ?

what garbage are you gonna decide to blurt out tomorrow, shlthead ? loooooool


FACT: you are just another shlthead casual-fan... who has no idea how to score a fight


you are my bltch, I exposed you... go play in traffic phaggot






...

Clutching at straws again buddy, omg this is gold, once again your proving u can't read or count, yes I know you're 20ish, or there abouts, anyone this ****** has to be, and I KNOW u just claimed u were about 60 years old, u said u started boxing in 1981 ffs, pls keep up here d1ckhead, I know u clearly struggle but ffs now you're gonna ignore u said that, you're covers been blown unfortunately, everyone on here reading this knows you're a lying bulls**ter, do try to come back from this epic embarrassment though, everytime I see u post I will remind u and everyone else of your made up fantasies though, so good luck in your future endeavors here

[I have no ears]

it does not you ignorant little shlthead

you just stated that you scored the rematch for Golovkin because of... clean punching, effective aggression, defense... but, FACT: Canelo made Golovkin fight his fight ALL NIGHT LONG... as admitted by Able Sanchez himself... FACT: Golovkin could not get his game going at all...


"So in the fight, I was trying to have Gennady make it a fight. Instead of allowing Canelo to rest, I wanted him to fight more. Obviously, we wanted [Golovkin] to do a lot of different things,” Sanchez said during the post-fight press conference. But when they’re in the ring, they’re gonna do the things that they see available to them. Canelo fought the fight that he needed to fight today to win."


does that sound like Golovkin was fighting his fight, you little spastic... ?????

FACT: Golovkin could not even follow his own gameplan LMAO

idiot, you are talking shlt

and clean punching, effective aggression, defense... do not cover... adapting, taking away your opponents strengths, and out-thinking your opponent... either


FACT: you embarrassed yourself, and you exposed yourself... when you insisted that ring generalship was the same as, effective aggression, clean punching, and defense... but then blurted out a definition for ring-generalship you had googled, that had nothing whatsoever to do with... effective aggression, clean punching, and defense looooooooool


and wait, sooooo... first, you swore black-n-blue that I was 20yo... and now you swear that I'm an old age pensioner...???

which one is it shlthead ?

what garbage are you gonna decide to blurt out tomorrow, shlthead ? loooooool


FACT: you are just another shlthead casual-fan... who has no idea how to score a fight


you are my bltch, I exposed you... go play in traffic phaggot






...

Omfg and you're rebuttal to making out u were 60 years old is " no it does not ****head" hahahaha omg my fkn sides, were u six years old in your fantasy boxing career my man???? What the actual f, I'm dealing with a literal ret**d here, pls pls explain further and dig a bigger hole for yourself, it's pure entertainment for me and everyone else who's seen this thread

[GhostofDempsey]

Whatever Golovkin had left of his prime was taken from him in the D-Chenko fight. He is approaching 40 and would have to move to 168 for a trilogy. I don’t see it happening.

[aboutfkntime]

clutching at straws again buddy, omg this is gold, once again your proving u can't read or count, yes I know you're 20ish, or there abouts, anyone this ****** has to be, and I KNOW u just claimed u were about 60 years old, u said u started boxing in 1981 ffs, pls keep up here d1ckhead, I know u clearly struggle but ffs now you're gonna ignore u said that, you're covers been blown unfortunately, everyone on here reading this knows you're a lying bulls**ter, do try to come back from this epic embarrassment though, everytime I see u post I will remind u and everyone else of your made up fantasies though, so good luck in your future endeavors here

FACT: you have only been here for 5 minutes, and EVERYONE already knows that you are just a shlt-talking little spastic

who's ass did you crawl out of, alt... ?


FACT: you embarrassed yourself, and you exposed yourself... when you insisted that ring generalship was the same as... effective aggression, clean punching, and defense... but then blurted out a definition for ring-generalship you had googled, that had nothing whatsoever to do with... effective aggression, clean punching, and defense loooooool


what, so... despite the fact that the commission determined there were FOUR valid criteria for scoring a professional boxing match... you think some little spastic on the internet can roll up on his 3-wheeler and delete one of those criteria... simply because he does not understand it...?


o... k... then...

GTFOH you little re-tard


1) give yourself an uppercut for being such a dumb shlthead

2) delete that shltty account.,.. you fcuked it up, beyond repair

3) create another alt, so your presence here does not cause you further embarrassment... but, NEVER discuss boxing... EVER again loooooool


FACT: it only took you 5 minutes to prove to everyone that you are just another casual-fan fool

#tosser








...

[I have no ears]

FACT: you have only been here for 5 minutes, and EVERYONE already knows that you are just a shlt-talking little spastic

who's ass did you crawl out of, alt... ?


FACT: you embarrassed yourself, and you exposed yourself... when you insisted that ring generalship was the same as... effective aggression, clean punching, and defense... but then blurted out a definition for ring-generalship you had googled, that had nothing whatsoever to do with... effective aggression, clean punching, and defense loooooool


what, so... despite the fact that the commission determined there were FOUR valid criteria for scoring a professional boxing match... you think some little spastic on the internet can roll up on his 3-wheeler and delete one of those criteria... simply because he does not understand it...?


o... k... then...

GTFOH you little re-tard


1) give yourself an uppercut for being such a dumb shlthead

2) delete that shltty account.,.. you fcuked it up, beyond repair

3) create another alt, so your presence here does not cause you further embarrassment... but, NEVER discuss boxing... EVER again loooooool


FACT: it only took you 5 minutes to prove to everyone that you are just another casual-fan fool

#tosser








...

Hahaha still no acknowledgement or explanation of your clearly made up story, keep digging b1tch, absolute gold, so how old were u when u started boxing my man? Everyone's wanting to know, save yourself, u have the chance now but know you've screwed up so badly that u keep ignoring the obvious holes in your story, just tell us all how old u were when u started and how old u are now, "but u love Golovkin" shut up f*gg*t, explain your lie now

[aboutfkntime]

...






hey shlthead, write us another novel explaining how... clean punching, effective aggression, and defense... is the same as, ring generalship... but then google another definition of ring generalship, proving that... clean punching, effective aggression, and defense... is NOT the same as, ring generalship

because yea, that was real funny when you did that loooooool


FACT: you embarrassed yourself, and you exposed yourself... when you insisted that ring generalship was the same as... effective aggression, clean punching, and defense... but then blurted out a definition for ring-generalship you had googled, that had nothing whatsoever to do with... effective aggression, clean punching, and defense loooooool



tenor.gif?itemid=9755587.gif