Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Canelo Spurns Golovkin Again, Prefers To Fight Charlo

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by I have no ears View Post
    This term ring generalship means a boxer who controls the action and puts himself in position to land clean punches, or using a strategy to make his opponent fight his fight





    Abel Sanchez admitted, that Golovkin could not do what he wanted in that fight... Sanchez told Golovkin that he was losing, and he implored him to fight Canelo... because that was their gameplan... they trained for that, that is how they intended to fight...


    "Obviously, we wanted [Golovkin] to do a lot of different things,” Sanchez said during the post-fight press conference. But when they’re in the ring, they’re gonna do the things that they see available to them. Canelo fought the fight that he needed to fight today to win.

    "But that’s the kind of fight that I expected, that’s the kind of fight that the fans expected and when I talked to Gennady all along this training camp, I explained to him that I thought Canelo was gonna stand and trade with him. So in the fight, I was trying to have Gennady make it a fight. Instead of allowing Canelo to rest, I wanted him to fight more.
    "


    but you... you decided to exclude ring generalship LMAO... because you had no idea what it was, until you googled it

    otherwise, you would have mentioned it before I called you out... and you would NOT be saying foolish nonsense like "Golovkin won easy"

    the guy could not get his game going at all LMAO... no pipe-bursting pressure, no trademark body-work, no cutting off the ring and hammering his opponent on the ropes

    I guess all of that stuff slipped your mind... as you were frantically googling 'ring generalship'

    you are just another dopey casual, talking out of his ass... seen it all before... keep coming kid, keep walking into those nice shots







    ...

    Comment


    • Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View Post
      So long as he has a choice, Canelo Alvarez seems to have every intention of giving the cold shoulder to the idea of facing his bete noire Gennadiy Golovkin in a third fight. Alvarez (56-1-2, 38 KOs) was recently asked, point blank, during an interview on The DAZN Boxing Show if he would rather face the IBF middleweight champion Golovkin or the WBC middleweight champion Jermall Charlo.
      [Click Here To Read More]
      “SPURNS” like in a “jilted lover”. WTF??
      Theatrics of MEN now a days is EMBARRASSING.
      How bout just saying Canelo doesn’t want to go down to weight no more and that he’s considering Charlo? Most Probably at 168.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post






        Abel Sanchez admitted, that Golovkin could not do what he wanted in that fight... Sanchez told Golovkin that he was losing, and he implored him to fight Canelo... because that was their gameplan... they trained for that, that is how they intended to fight...


        "Obviously, we wanted [Golovkin] to do a lot of different things,” Sanchez said during the post-fight press conference. But when they’re in the ring, they’re gonna do the things that they see available to them. Canelo fought the fight that he needed to fight today to win.

        "But that’s the kind of fight that I expected, that’s the kind of fight that the fans expected and when I talked to Gennady all along this training camp, I explained to him that I thought Canelo was gonna stand and trade with him. So in the fight, I was trying to have Gennady make it a fight. Instead of allowing Canelo to rest, I wanted him to fight more.
        "


        but you... you decided to exclude ring generalship LMAO... because you had no idea what it was, until you googled it

        otherwise, you would have mentioned it before I called you out... and you would NOT be saying foolish nonsense like "Golovkin won easy"

        the guy could not get his game going at all LMAO... no pipe-bursting pressure, no trademark body-work, no cutting off the ring and hammering his opponent on the ropes

        I guess all of that stuff slipped your mind... as you were frantically googling 'ring generalship'

        you are just another dopey casual, talking out of his ass... seen it all before... keep coming kid, keep walking into those nice shots







        ...
        Who the f wouldn't know what ring generalship means when they have watched boxing for this long? I've debated the outcome of many fights, you're clearly the kid, I'm actually talking to a 20 year old, who's watched about no more than 30 fights in his lifetime, I stated before that ring generalship is an amalgamation of every other criteria, it's just a generic term for everything else put together and u think cos I never mentioned it in the criteria that makes me a casual, you're actually clutching at straws, I've actually debated ppl before on this matter before u were born that it is everything else rolled into one, yet here u are making out only u know how to score, what a pretentious douchebag, and still you're nelo bias is showing, and of course I googled it, I wanted to write down the precise definition almost word for word to u so u would see that everything I said was right, but not because I didn't know what it meant, only because you've tried twisting my words in previous posts so I wanted to be completely clear this time, i've debated ring generalship and the ways to score fights before many times in here with ppl who actually know what be there talking about and in most cases without any bias cos that's the best debates to have. In my previous post I put effective defense and u jumped on that like I didn't know what I was talking about but everything needs to be effective otherwise it would be ineffective u utter bellend, clean punches needs to be effective, aggression needs to be effective and defense needs to be effective so wherever I put effective before any of those was irrelevant, you're a child who still lives with momma and u think if u google all the ways to score fights u can comment on here like you're an all knowing god when really you're just a f*gg*t who's never been in a fight, in a ring or out of it, who also has an unhealthy obsession with a Mexican male boxer, it's kinda g*y bro, you're bravado isn't masking it too well, I guarantee u have never thrown a punch in your life, but with the attitude u have I know you've been punched quite a few times, and probably knocked out too judging by the trouble u have at reading what's infront of u

        Comment


        • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
          ...






          anyone who insists that they score using the official criteria... clean hard punching, effective aggression, defense, and ring generalship... and yet somehow thinks that Golovkin won the rematch... is just a shlthead, wtf???

          what that rematch proved... is that Canelo is better than Golovkin in ALL of those departments... EVERY... SINGLE... ONE... he is also faster, sharper, has better skills, and is a much more well-rounded fighter

          wtf do you clowns see when you watch a fight... you clearly only watch one fighter, and cannot understand how a fight unfolds


          morons






          ...
          The fact is more ppl scored it for Golovkin using the very criteria u claim to know so well since u googled it last February, u can claim some ppl gave it to nelo but more gave it Golovkin, this is facts, no-matter how many times u state otherwise, the first fight was decisive for Golovkin yet it was called a draw, the second was damn close, could have been called a draw but most gave it 7-5 Golovkin, deal with it without crying so hard, I suspect you've had this debate with other ppl on here and lost it over and over hence why your still so weirdly passionate about it and nelo, take a breath and rewatch it, especially the first fight, and not on a g*y nelo friendly YouTube channel that's telling u what not to look for, and u will see what happened and what 80% of everyone else saw, which u claim are casuals

          Comment


          • Originally posted by I have no ears View Post

            Who the f wouldn't know what ring generalship means when they have watched boxing for this long? I've debated the outcome of many fights, you're clearly the kid, I'm actually talking to a 20 year old, who's watched about no more than 30 fights in his lifetime, I stated before that ring generalship is an amalgamation of every other criteria, it's just a generic term for everything else put together and u think cos I never mentioned it in the criteria that makes me a casual, you're actually clutching at straws, I've actually debated ppl before on this matter before u were born that it is everything else rolled into one, yet here u are making out only u know how to score, what a pretentious douchebag, and still you're nelo bias is showing, and of course I googled it, I wanted to write down the precise definition almost word for word to u so u would see that everything I said was right, but not because I didn't know what it meant, only because you've tried twisting my words in previous posts so I wanted to be completely clear this time, i've debated ring generalship and the ways to score fights before many times in here with ppl who actually know what be there talking about and in most cases without any bias cos that's the best debates to have. In my previous post I put effective defense and u jumped on that like I didn't know what I was talking about but everything needs to be effective otherwise it would be ineffective u utter bellend, clean punches needs to be effective, aggression needs to be effective and defense needs to be effective so wherever I put effective before any of those was irrelevant, you're a child who still lives with momma and u think if u google all the ways to score fights u can comment on here like you're an all knowing god when really you're just a f*gg*t who's never been in a fight, in a ring or out of it, who also has an unhealthy obsession with a Mexican male boxer, it's kinda g*y bro, you're bravado isn't masking it too well, I guarantee u have never thrown a punch in your life, but with the attitude u have I know you've been punched quite a few times, and probably knocked out too judging by the trouble u have at reading what's infront of u








            i have had more than 30 fights in my lifetime, you little shlthead LMAO

            you are a shlt-talking idiot who already proved that he does not understand ring generalship, and does not know how to score a fight

            you copied that from google, word for word

            listen kid... just because a bunch of little shltheads keep repeating something, does not make it true

            FACT: Hypekin lost... and by the sound of things, so did you

            grow up idiot... stop falling in love with hype-jobs, it's fkn creepy... grow up, and at least make an attempt to understand this sport

            here...

            pick your bottom lip up off the ground, and learn how a real man should behave when his hypejob loses...



            "Obviously, we wanted [Golovkin] to do a lot of different things,” Sanchez said during the post-fight press conference. But when they’re in the ring, they’re gonna do the things that they see available to them. Canelo fought the fight that he needed to fight today to win.

            "But that’s the kind of fight that I expected, that’s the kind of fight that the fans expected and when I talked to Gennady all along this training camp, I explained to him that I thought Canelo was gonna stand and trade with him. So in the fight, I was trying to have Gennady make it a fight. Instead of allowing Canelo to rest, I wanted him to fight more.
            "




            tumblr_no4egf0fRD1u1urhko1_400.gif

            Comment


            • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post









              i have had more than 30 fights in my lifetime, you little shlthead LMAO

              you are a shlt-talking idiot who already proved that he does not understand ring generalship, and does not know how to score a fight

              you copied that from google, word for word

              listen kid... just because a bunch of little shltheads keep repeating something, does not make it true

              FACT: Hypekin lost... and by the sound of things, so did you

              grow up idiot... stop falling in love with hype-jobs, it's fkn creepy... grow up, and at least make an attempt to understand this sport

              here...

              pick your bottom lip up off the ground, and learn how a real man should behave when his hypejob loses...



              "Obviously, we wanted [Golovkin] to do a lot of different things,” Sanchez said during the post-fight press conference. But when they’re in the ring, they’re gonna do the things that they see available to them. Canelo fought the fight that he needed to fight today to win.

              "But that’s the kind of fight that I expected, that’s the kind of fight that the fans expected and when I talked to Gennady all along this training camp, I explained to him that I thought Canelo was gonna stand and trade with him. So in the fight, I was trying to have Gennady make it a fight. Instead of allowing Canelo to rest, I wanted him to fight more.
              "




              tumblr_no4egf0fRD1u1urhko1_400.gif
              Hahaha, you're doing it again child, I don't like Golovkin as a person or a boxer as I've stated many times, I never understood the hype around him until the nelo fights if I'm being honest, but u clearly keep ignoring this cos it makes you're whole argument fall apart, you've been outed as a nelo buttlicker and just a massive f*g in general. And 30 fights my ****ing ass, fights with you're g*y brother and little sister don't count, you've never thrown a punch in you're life and this forum is you're fantasyland where u get to act like the guy u with wish u were, facts.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by I have no ears View Post
                Hahaha, you're doing it again child, I don't like Golovkin as a person or a boxer as I've stated many times, I never understood the hype around him until the nelo fights if I'm being honest, but u clearly keep ignoring this cos it makes you're whole argument fall apart, you've been outed as a nelo buttlicker and just a massive f*g in general. And 30 fights my ****ing ass, fights with you're g*y brother and little sister don't count, you've never thrown a punch in you're life and this forum is you're fantasyland where u get to act like the guy u with wish u were, facts.





                1) fcuk Clenelo... and fcuk you... you are just another idiot casual-fan who is way out-of-his-depth

                you... are just a ignorant little lightweight, who joined yesterday... and I... am a veteran heavyweight...

                go google 'ring generalship' again, you dopey little casual-fan LMAO

                you embarrassed yourself when you insisted that ring generalship was the same as... effective aggression, clean punching, defense... and then blurted out a definition for ring-generalship that you googled, that had nothing whatsoever to do with... effective aggression, clean punching, defense looooooooool

                stop talking shlt you dumb butt-monkey... you exposed yourself




                2) I had my first amateur fight back in 1982, you dumb cvnt... or was it 81, can't remember now

                stop talking shlt you little blowhard... stick to using your ****-warmer for things you are obviously better at doing than arguing with me


                seen it all before






                ...

                Comment


                • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post






                  1) fcuk Clenelo... and fcuk you... you are just another idiot casual-fan who is way out-of-his-depth

                  you... are just a ignorant little lightweight, who joined yesterday... and I... am a veteran heavyweight...

                  go google 'ring generalship' again, you dopey little casual-fan LMAO

                  you embarrassed yourself when you insisted that ring generalship was the same as... effective aggression, clean punching, defense... and then blurted out a definition for ring-generalship that you googled, that had nothing whatsoever to do with... effective aggression, clean punching, defense looooooooool

                  stop talking shlt you dumb butt-monkey... you exposed yourself




                  2) I had my first amateur fight back in 1982, you dumb cvnt... or was it 81, can't remember now

                  stop talking shlt you little blowhard... stick to using your ****-warmer for things you are obviously better at doing than arguing with me


                  seen it all before






                  ...
                  Haha sure thing buddy, wow, u really exposed yourself there, that would mean u were born in atleast 1961, anyone who was born then would not be on the internet talking at a fifth grade level, your no more than 20 years old and you've never had a fight in you're life u little b1tch, this debate, if u can call it that, has been the biggest fight you ever had in your short little life, s**t your mum's coming up the stairs, better get off the laptop and jump into bed little boy

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr View Post
                    Charlo isn’t going to fight Canelo and neither will Plant.
                    Excuse us if we give absolutely no credibility to your ignorant opinion. Remember you're the dumb a$$ who claimed Pac was fighting Crawford and all the Crawford detractors need to STFU. Face it no one has any faith in your bu!!shyte.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by I have no ears View Post
                      Haha sure thing buddy, wow, u really exposed yourself there, that would mean u were born in atleast 1961, anyone who was born then would not be on the internet talking at a fifth grade level, your no more than 20 years old and you've never had a fight in you're life u little b1tch, this debate, if u can call it that, has been the biggest fight you ever had in your short little life, s**t your mum's coming up the stairs, better get off the laptop and jump into bed little boy





                      how the fk did you work that out you idiot ?

                      I will add the fact that you think I am 20, to your growing list of ******ity


                      FACT: you embarrassed yourself, and you exposed yourself... when you insisted that ring generalship was the same as, effective aggression, clean punching, and defense... but then blurted out a definition for ring-generalship you had googled, that had nothing whatsoever to do with... effective aggression, clean punching, and defense looooooooool

                      talk shlt much ?



                      tenor.gif?itemid=9755587.gif

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP