Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Canelo Spurns Golovkin Again, Prefers To Fight Charlo

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • TBH, I would much rather see Canelo fight Charlo than go for a third match against Golovkin. Time to move on to the young lion.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by I have no ears View Post

      Bruh no-one believes you're ****, it's a known fact kids can do boxing, I even mentioned it in my post but u can't start an amateur career til your 13, and a 53 year old who puts his post in huge font like a 7 year old, gtfoh, you're in your early 20s max, u talk like a guy with a reading age of no more than a 10 year old, you're dumb and a liar, when are u gonna stop embarrassing yourself








      tell us your cool story about ring generalship again, bro



      FACT: you embarrassed yourself, and you exposed yourself... when you insisted that ring generalship was the same as... effective aggression, clean punching, and defense... but then blurted out a definition for ring-generalship you had googled, that had nothing whatsoever to do with... effective aggression, clean punching, and defense


      looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool


      Funny-Crying-Baby-Face-Photo.jpg

      Comment


      • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post









        tell us your cool story about ring generalship again, bro



        FACT: you embarrassed yourself, and you exposed yourself... when you insisted that ring generalship was the same as... effective aggression, clean punching, and defense... but then blurted out a definition for ring-generalship you had googled, that had nothing whatsoever to do with... effective aggression, clean punching, and defense


        looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool


        Funny-Crying-Baby-Face-Photo.jpg
        My ring generalship views should be held by most boxing observers, the fact they use such a vague term to score bouts is a clear indication it's used by corrupt organizations to benefit favoured fighters in judging fights, what's stated in the definition is exactly what would be happening if all the other categories of fight scoring would be observed, the fact u can't get that is not surprising given you're mental age and actual age for that matter, and the fact u haven't understood what I've been saying the whole time is more proof of you're ******ity, u don't have to agree with me, it wouldn't be a debate if u did, but what u do have to do is not tell pure fantasy stories to make u think your looking like a boxing aficionado, when really your blatant and clear lies make u look like a complete douchebag try hard, who continues a lie so absurd that anyone reading this thread would be laughing at u, the facts are, your not in your mid fifties, you've never thrown a punch in your life, nevermind been in a boxing ring and your currently arguing on your momma's laptop to try and save face cos u know everyone can see through all the lies you've told in this here convo, I pity u, but carry on pretending to be twice as old as u are, it's pure comedy, even though it's bizarre and pathetic to put it mildly

        Comment


        • Good time to move on the so called invincible GGG who people on here claimed would have whooped the 4 kings of the 80s got exposed at the top level and he ain't getting any better

          Rather watch canelo fight charlo

          Comment


          • Originally posted by I have no ears View Post
            My ring generalship views should be held by most boxing observers, the fact they use such a vague term to score bouts is a clear indication it's used by corrupt organizations to benefit favoured fighters in judging fights, what's stated in the definition is exactly what would be happening if all the other categories of fight scoring would be observed, the fact u can't get that is not surprising given you're mental age and actual age for that matter, and the fact u haven't understood what I've been saying the whole time is more proof of you're ******ity, u don't have to agree with me, it wouldn't be a debate if u did, but what u do have to do is not tell pure fantasy stories to make u think your looking like a boxing aficionado, when really your blatant and clear lies make u look like a complete douchebag try hard, who continues a lie so absurd that anyone reading this thread would be laughing at u, the facts are, your not in your mid fifties, you've never thrown a punch in your life, nevermind been in a boxing ring and your currently arguing on your momma's laptop to try and save face cos u know everyone can see through all the lies you've told in this here convo, I pity u, but carry on pretending to be twice as old as u are, it's pure comedy, even though it's bizarre and pathetic to put it mildly





            your ring-generalship views, are just plain ignorant... childishly ignorant... you sound like a spotty kid who never laced em up in his life

            embarrassing

            you LITERALLY excluded ring generalship, insisting that it was covered by the other 3 criteria... but then you posted a definition for ring generalship, that is clearly NOT covered by the other 3 criteria... WTF???

            embarrassing


            you google-fcuked yourself, you spastic

            then you tried to say it was impossible for a 10 year old to box LMAO

            you are just another dribbling re-tard

            seen it all before







            tenor.gif?itemid=9755587.gif

            Comment


            • Originally posted by davef View Post
              Good time to move on the so called invincible GGG who people on here claimed would have whooped the 4 kings of the 80s got exposed at the top level and he ain't getting any better

              Rather watch canelo fight charlo





              yea wtf ?

              would've beaten Hagler... but barely sc****d past Danny Jacobs

              o... k... then...







              ...

              Comment


              • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post






                your ring-generalship views, are just plain ignorant... childishly ignorant... you sound like a spotty kid who never laced em up in his life

                embarrassing

                you LITERALLY excluded ring generalship, insisting that it was covered by the other 3 criteria... but then you posted a definition for ring generalship, that is clearly NOT covered by the other 3 criteria... WTF???

                embarrassing


                you google-fcuked yourself, you spastic

                then you tried to say it was impossible for a 10 year old to box LMAO

                you are just another dribbling re-tard

                seen it all before







                tenor.gif?itemid=9755587.gif
                The irony of u trying to claim someone else is ignorant, what a fkn world. I excluded ring generalship and gave my reasons, u disagreed during your nelo ass licking outburst, I googled the exact definition to back up my case and u being the autistic type who has problems with lying and a very real delusion of grandeur, took that and twisted it, and then made claims to have started an amateur boxing career in 1981, then when called out on that obvious bs u actually googled frantically to find out when someone can start a boxing career then worked it out wrong in you're head and said u were 53 years old and u started at 10, yet if u started at 10 which is okay for kiddie boxing, but not allowed in amateur's I might add, then that would have put u being born in 1971, which would make u 50, clearly showing u are completely full of s**t and bad at maths and just an all round total lying bellend, not to mention the only person in this forum to use huge bold writing like someone with mental age of a seven year old would, I seriously cant describe just how ****** u are, u will never get it, even though the dates you've given don't even work, your still carrying on, never go full ****** child

                Comment


                • Originally posted by I have no ears View Post

                  The irony of u trying to claim someone else is ignorant, what a fkn world. I excluded ring generalship and gave my reasons, u disagreed during your nelo ass licking outburst, I googled the exact definition to back up my case and u being the autistic type who has problems with lying and a very real delusion of grandeur, took that and twisted it, and then made claims to have started an amateur boxing career in 1981, then when called out on that obvious bs u actually googled frantically to find out when someone can start a boxing career then worked it out wrong in you're head and said u were 53 years old and u started at 10, yet if u started at 10 which is okay for kiddie boxing, but not allowed in amateur's I might add, then that would have put u being born in 1971, which would make u 50, clearly showing u are completely full of s**t and bad at maths and just an all round total lying bellend, not to mention the only person in this forum to use huge bold writing like someone with mental age of a seven year old would, I seriously cant describe just how ****** u are, u will never get it, even though the dates you've given don't even work, your still carrying on, never go full ****** child







                  the commission saw fit to include FOUR official criteria to score a professional boxing match


                  but a pimply little shlthead rode up on his tricycle, and deleted one of those criteria


                  and the pimply little shlthead did that... because he had NO IDEA what it means



                  FCUKEN HILARIOUS !



                  tenor.gif?itemid=9755587.gif

                  Comment


                  • ...






                    dude didn't like the rules...

                    so dude deleted one of them

                    loooooooooooooool




                    200.gif

                    Comment


                    • Yup the commission, who are one of the most corrupt ent-ities in the entire sporting world, atleast now u understand what I was getting at, took u near enough a week but u got there in the end boy, shame u had to expose yourself to get there though, now everyone knows you're a liar and a fraud, so my work is done here

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP