I can see it, but I agree with you. There is a principle of epistemology here that is neglected... sort of the opposite of "if it ain't broke don't fix it." That principle is, "If someone has tried, and has not succeeded... don't assume otherwise unless some massive change has occurred... sort of like the physical world where a force will go forward until met with an equal or greater force... After all the talking and other nonsense? What we truly KNOW is that Usyk faltered when he took on a half decent gate keeping heavyweight. And I don't care what the judges thought... Its on tape, it can be watched.
Also, if one looks at Usyk, he was a fantastic cruiser... I might put him on a short list, its all on tape all the things he could do: head movement, tempo changes on his punches, angles, finishing aggressively... But he depended on being physical as a fighter to do these things, something he cannot do at heavy weight. To me this is an easy fight to call: First, we have precedent and then we have a breakdown which fails to show how Usyk can be physical with a fighter the size of Joshua. All Joshua has to do to win is catch Usyk who lately fights with his chin up and moves straight back... vis a vis he was almost clipped hard against slow Derrick doing this.
Also, if one looks at Usyk, he was a fantastic cruiser... I might put him on a short list, its all on tape all the things he could do: head movement, tempo changes on his punches, angles, finishing aggressively... But he depended on being physical as a fighter to do these things, something he cannot do at heavy weight. To me this is an easy fight to call: First, we have precedent and then we have a breakdown which fails to show how Usyk can be physical with a fighter the size of Joshua. All Joshua has to do to win is catch Usyk who lately fights with his chin up and moves straight back... vis a vis he was almost clipped hard against slow Derrick doing this.
Comment