Originally posted by LeOoze
View Post
I don't know, maybe that couple million plus who bought Floyd/Pac who got turned off from watching Floyd fight an obvious cherrypick to a boring win and vowed to never watch another Floyd fight unless it was a prime fighter, or maybe his critics who accused him of cherrypicking and backed it up by citing the fact that he fought a washed up c fighter in Berto over a prime hungry lion in Thurman who was calling him out and was his mandatory.
Do you not know boxing history. Holmes wanted to break Rocky Marci's record and he made a mistake thinking a former light heavy would beat him.
You do realize that former Lighheavy is top ten all time @ Lightheavy and was just as good p4p as Larry was.
They don't want a black man getting 50-0. Berto scoreDod 3 rounds against Floyd in one of the scorecards when Floyd easily beat him for 12 rounds. Imagine if Thurman was competitive? Good chance Floyd would've gotten robbed. Floyd already had an ATG/legendary career, he can end his 50-0 career with whoever he wanted.
So what "they" are you talking about?
So are you insinuating that Floyd was justified in fighting a low risk c class bum because he wanted to preserve his undefeated record?
I've heard it all now. How dare he actually fight a live dog huh.
Comment