Comments Thread For: Tyson Fury Risks All-Time Big-Man Title in Deontay Wilder Trilogy

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • thetruthteller
    Banned
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Oct 2020
    • 485
    • 155
    • 1
    • 2,848

    #231
    Originally posted by I have no ears

    So according to u, every hw boxer other than AJ is either a bum or a fraud, yep you're clearly not a fangirl buddy. I like AJ and respect the work he's done but I know he will have real trouble against fury just on the observation test. Im not saying for definite fury would beat him but he's the bookies favourite for that fight for a reason, and that reason is most boxing analysts who aren't fangirls like u can see exactly how fury will be all wrong for AJ. If u think kabayel is awful, then u must think chisora is awful, and if chisora is awful, then Whyte is awful as chisora should have been given the decision in their first fight and was up on the scorecards before Whyte caught him late in the second, and if obviously chisora is awful in your eyes then parker must be too, are u following? I didn't praise pianeta, I just refuse to call any boxer a fraud or a bum as I know what it takes to just get into the ring and the fact he beat duhaupas who gave wilder a very hard fight shows he's not as bad as u think and for a tune up coming off a long lay off including lots of drink, drugs and bad food it's a perfect fight to take. If Joshua did the same in the same condition I would say the same. And fury was partying for 3 straight years and went into the wilder fight very quickly and his natural talent got him through, I believe a half trained fury would beat AJ, that's just how good he is, you've claimed he won't fight this guy or that guy but then next post made out those guys are awful because the ppl he has fought have fought them and either won or came very close to winning so that's where you're argument falls apart, well that, and the fact that everyone is a fraud other than AJ according to u and the other AJ ring lickers. AJ has fought ppl who are mostly out if there prime, pulev, povetkin, takam, Klitschko, who was almost two years on from the fury fight, infact only two guys he has fought in the last four years haven't been way out if their prime and that parker and Ruiz and Ruiz destroyed him and would have in the second if he wasn't grossly overweight, the same kinda overweight fury was when he box wilder's ears off, there's levels to this and fury is top level
    OK, so obviously what ever I say will get twisted. so let's try this one more time. Quote me on this OK? THE ENTIRE POINT OF BOXING, IS ACTUALLY FIGHTING IN THE RING TO PROVE YOU ARE THE BETTER FIGHTER. Did you get that? Both Wilder and Fury have not fought ANY of the top heavyweights of the past 5 years. Did you get that too? I didn't say everyone except AJ was a bum. You did. I said, other than Whyte, he is the only one who is actually trying to consistently fight the best out there. If that makes me a fan girl in your eyes, then so be it. But you praising Fury, who kisses men in the ring, can make you into Fury's boyfriend (see how I spun that just like you do?) And prime or not, Pulev, Povetkin and the rest of the guys AJ fought...Wilder and Fury fought NONE OF THEM. And that is my full point. They have avoided anyone who could upset their apple cart. And Ruiz? Are you really bringing him up again? He is an embarrassment to himself and the sport. You give Fury props for beating Klitschko (in the most boring, eyesore of a fight ever) yet dump on AJ who KOed him two years later. Ruiz gets props for beating AJ yet you diminish AJ's rematch victory saying Ruiz was fat. Well who's fault was it that he was fat? I am sure you were part of the rest of the guys on here that said there shouldn't even BE a rematch for Ruiz vs AJ because it would be just like the first fight. That or you said that a fatter Ruiz is a better Ruiz haha. So in fact, I am the only one who is seeing things clearly here. And I clearly see Wilder and Fury as frauds who avoid the best.

    Comment

    • billeau2
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2012
      • 27643
      • 6,397
      • 14,933
      • 339,839

      #232
      Originally posted by kafkod
      I guess you don't understand the statement. Why don't you ask someone to explain it to you.

      Comment

      • billeau2
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jun 2012
        • 27643
        • 6,397
        • 14,933
        • 339,839

        #233
        Originally posted by kafkod

        Please tell me you are not confusing Mike Quarry with the famous HW contender Gerry Quarry,?
        I did. Thats my bad. No excuses.

        Comment

        • kafkod
          I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2013
          • 24824
          • 2,195
          • 1,812
          • 405,373

          #234
          Jerry Quarry never won a world title, but he would have been too big and tough for Bob Foster. Foster was a fearsome puncher at 175lbs, but couldn't put a dent in any of the top HWs he fought.
          Last edited by kafkod; 06-26-2021, 04:23 PM.

          Comment

          • I have no ears
            Hall moniter
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Apr 2021
            • 568
            • 193
            • 200
            • 0

            #235
            Originally posted by thetruthteller

            OK, so obviously what ever I say will get twisted. so let's try this one more time. Quote me on this OK? THE ENTIRE POINT OF BOXING, IS ACTUALLY FIGHTING IN THE RING TO PROVE YOU ARE THE BETTER FIGHTER. Did you get that? Both Wilder and Fury have not fought ANY of the top heavyweights of the past 5 years. Did you get that too? I didn't say everyone except AJ was a bum. You did. I said, other than Whyte, he is the only one who is actually trying to consistently fight the best out there. If that makes me a fan girl in your eyes, then so be it. But you praising Fury, who kisses men in the ring, can make you into Fury's boyfriend (see how I spun that just like you do?) And prime or not, Pulev, Povetkin and the rest of the guys AJ fought...Wilder and Fury fought NONE OF THEM. And that is my full point. They have avoided anyone who could upset their apple cart. And Ruiz? Are you really bringing him up again? He is an embarrassment to himself and the sport. You give Fury props for beating Klitschko (in the most boring, eyesore of a fight ever) yet dump on AJ who KOed him two years later. Ruiz gets props for beating AJ yet you diminish AJ's rematch victory saying Ruiz was fat. Well who's fault was it that he was fat? I am sure you were part of the rest of the guys on here that said there shouldn't even BE a rematch for Ruiz vs AJ because it would be just like the first fight. That or you said that a fatter Ruiz is a better Ruiz haha. So in fact, I am the only one who is seeing things clearly here. And I clearly see Wilder and Fury as frauds who avoid the best.
            By twisted, u meant I completely destroyed your whole argument wilder tried to fight povetkin, in his own backyard no less, where unless u ko the guy u lose on points but povetkin was caught with PEDs in his system or did u forget that one? Keep going though, it's hilarious watching u own yourself over and over again

            Comment

            • thetruthteller
              Banned
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Oct 2020
              • 485
              • 155
              • 1
              • 2,848

              #236
              Originally posted by I have no ears

              By twisted, u meant I completely destroyed your whole argument wilder tried to fight povetkin, in his own backyard no less, where unless u ko the guy u lose on points but povetkin was caught with PEDs in his system or did u forget that one? Keep going though, it's hilarious watching u own yourself over and over again
              Didn't forget the PEDs at all. But you did, when I brought it up for Fury. "I have no ears" is perfect for you because you don't listen and you cannot hear what anyone else is saying. So you stay with that and have a nice one. No more back and forth with you now. I'll see you after the fight.

              Comment

              • I have no ears
                Hall moniter
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Apr 2021
                • 568
                • 193
                • 200
                • 0

                #237
                Originally posted by thetruthteller

                Didn't forget the PEDs at all. But you did, when I brought it up for Fury. "I have no ears" is perfect for you because you don't listen and you cannot hear what anyone else is saying. So you stay with that and have a nice one. No more back and forth with you now. I'll see you after the fight.
                Aww **** son, oh well, it was fun while it lasted, but I was fully expecting u to b1tch out after I completely destroyed your assertions

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP