Agree that it makes no sense, but the bones of it are that someone in Fury's camp didn't want the fight.
But then someone in Fury's camp didn't want the Wilder fight either, otherwise we wouldn't have gone down this path.
There's an allegation in Eddie's interview that the reason that Wilder won was that Fury's team were entitled to cancel the contract back in December, but didn't. ie they didn't formally notify.
If that's true then the whole thing is an absolute slam dunk. It was a con. But then who has seen documentation of the ruling?
But then someone in Fury's camp didn't want the Wilder fight either, otherwise we wouldn't have gone down this path.
There's an allegation in Eddie's interview that the reason that Wilder won was that Fury's team were entitled to cancel the contract back in December, but didn't. ie they didn't formally notify.
If that's true then the whole thing is an absolute slam dunk. It was a con. But then who has seen documentation of the ruling?
Comment