Who hit harder p4p?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Addition
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 8534
    • 306
    • 140
    • 20,828

    #61
    Hamed was definitely the harder puncher.

    Comment

    • KILLA RIGHT
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Aug 2007
      • 8954
      • 294
      • 14
      • 16,348

      #62
      Originally posted by pacman777
      only have one of his fights in my hard drive and seen a few highlights from youtube tbh... did not even bother with the tomato-can fights... always regarded the guy as a tomato-can beater


      and dont call me bro cuz you aint my bro, ya feel me?
      Fair enough but don't tell me too feel you **** because im not feeling you. Way to base everything on highlights

      Comment

      • JAB5239
        Dallas Cowboys
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 27727
        • 5,036
        • 4,436
        • 73,018

        #63
        Originally posted by We want Floyd
        Listen man, NAZ's most brutal ko was against Augie Sanchez, okay. a mediocre pro

        PAC's most brutal ko was against a legit world-champ, Ricky Hatton. That enough speaks volumes of the difference in punching power


        I disagree. Hatton was badly wobbled only two fights before by Juan Lazcano and had already been ko'd by Floyd who hasn't really been known as a puncher since his days at 130 and 135.

        Comment

        • nujabes77
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2008
          • 8359
          • 535
          • 354
          • 16,443

          #64
          Originally posted by WetSexyLlamaPR
          Don't worry about him. A bum who accuses you of being a Pac nuthugger for being logical enough to see Pac is a harder puncher than Naz is an idiot. They can't debate with through logic and reason so they accuse you of nuthugging.
          its all good bro. ive always been a proud pachugger. dont mind people calling me it, its a compliment to me

          nuthugging a living atg like pac is a honor




          This logic is breathtakingly ******. And I mean that in the nicest possible way. You rank Naz higher based off what you "think" he could have done in the higher weight classes whereas Manny has proven time and again what he can do in terms of punching power in lower and higher weight classes against much better opposition than Naz ever faced.

          Nazeem got a ton of bum KO's in one weight class, 126. As soon as he faced a great fighter his power was nowhere to be seen.

          Manny has KO'd good to great fighters at 112, 122, 126, 135, 140 and 147. Until Nazeem does that and better, no, he will not go down as a harder puncher than Pac. Pac will go down because Pac did. Nazeem won't go down because Nazeem didn't.

          You don't get ranked higher than someone by what you could have done or didn't do. You get ranked by what you did. If you can't comprehend this then you have a learning disability and/or the IQ of an amoeba.

          you can say this again... green on the way bro

          Comment

          • nujabes77
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Dec 2008
            • 8359
            • 535
            • 354
            • 16,443

            #65
            [QUOTE=JAB5239;5994604]
            Originally posted by GetSumBrah

            But he has done those things with the other fighters I named and still claimed Naz as the hardest puncher he ever worked with p4p. Believe me, when I first read that there was no way I could believe Hamed was a harder puncher than Hearns. But why would Steward feel the need to say something like that if he didn't actually believe it?

            guess barerra would have sonned hearns as well

            Comment

            • Silencers
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2006
              • 21957
              • 505
              • 235
              • 32,983

              #66
              Pacquiao's power is more explosive, Hamed's is more thunderous, I'd go with Hamed pound for pound.

              Comment

              • nujabes77
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2008
                • 8359
                • 535
                • 354
                • 16,443

                #67
                Originally posted by JAB5239
                In other words you have no clue what you're talking about so you jump to conclusions based on being a nuthugger. Lmao!!

                99% of naz op were tomato cans, you actually want me to waste valuable hard drive space and time for that?

                Comment

                • JAB5239
                  Dallas Cowboys
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 27727
                  • 5,036
                  • 4,436
                  • 73,018

                  #68
                  [QUOTE=pacman777;5994674]
                  Originally posted by JAB5239


                  guess barerra would have sonned hearns as well
                  Keep posting nuthugger, I find idiots very entertaning. Lol, highlights!!

                  Comment

                  • We want Floyd
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • May 2007
                    • 2841
                    • 89
                    • 0
                    • 3,552

                    #69
                    Originally posted by JAB5239
                    [/b]

                    I disagree. Hatton was badly wobbled only two fights before by Juan Lazcano and had already been ko'd by Floyd who hasn't really been known as a puncher since his days at 130 and 135.
                    No matter how you wanna spin it. We're talkin' a naturally smaller fighter ko'ing a naturally bigger fighter.

                    Obviously, PAC's body has matured, it has grown. But, how many weight divisions has he gone through prior to ko'ing a legitimate 140lber.

                    Comment

                    • nujabes77
                      Banned
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Dec 2008
                      • 8359
                      • 535
                      • 354
                      • 16,443

                      #70
                      Originally posted by WetSexyLlamaPR
                      Don't worry about him. A bum who accuses you of being a Pac nuthugger for being logical enough to see Pac is a harder puncher than Naz is an idiot. They can't debate with through logic and reason so they accuse you of nuthugging.




                      This logic is breathtakingly ******. And I mean that in the nicest possible way. You rank Naz higher based off what you "think" he could have done in the higher weight classes whereas Manny has proven time and again what he can do in terms of punching power in lower and higher weight classes against much better opposition than Naz ever faced.

                      Nazeem got a ton of bum KO's in one weight class, 126. As soon as he faced a great fighter his power was nowhere to be seen.

                      Manny has KO'd good to great fighters at 112, 122, 126, 135, 140 and 147. Until Nazeem does that and better, no, he will not go down as a harder puncher than Pac. Pac will go down because Pac did. Nazeem won't go down because Nazeem didn't.

                      You don't get ranked higher than someone by what you could have done or didn't do. You get ranked by what you did. If you can't comprehend this then you have a learning disability and/or the IQ of an amoeba.


                      /thread





                      your sig is rocking btw lama, hehe :wank:

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP