Shameless legal experts

[billeau2]

8C732B1F-79EE-4351-8389-AE226E85BB4F28e376c41afa1b56.gifF5DCFCE7-AAB8-4895-AB3F-A69AD808ADCDbd71e77ee8ba09d1.gif

hahaha Hey Nelo want to know an interesting historical factoid? The Tango was apparently invented by men in Argentina who, would go to a waiting room, while waiting for a **********, in the house of the madam. The men would dance with each other while waiting... That dance was the Tango.

[billeau2]

A ton of y'all just got your asses shown hard. Been talking like you know all about contracts, never listened to the only mother ****er on this forum to ever sign any kind of television contract, got shown you're 100% ****ing wrong, and look at youse. Look at the ****ing state of youse. Still? You is still gonna front like you know yer ass huh?

And youse others who argue with them. WTF? Dude just got shown his ass all over the damn internet and since he's about a shameless **** who can never admit just being plainly and flatly wrong y'all gonna argue some more? **** man, seems like you need told so I'll do the telling. Ain't **** the "Wilder's got no chance" crowd can say to save their asses and there ain't **** you need to say to bury their asses.

Its like Archie Bunker says: "Youse got your black guys, espanole guys, your irish guys, your Indian guys, your ***s and your regular Americans."

[Marchegiano]

Calm down March. The word "youse" doesn't sit right within your diatribe. The thing that bothers me the most is Fury's side allowing this drama to play out in the media, when deep down, behind-closed doors, they must have known all along something like this would happen. As a Fury fan, it annoys me that he must have taken the advice of someone, and been confident they could wriggle out of a signed and sealed contractual agreement. Just disappointment all around for the Undisputed fight.

I am, however, interested to see if Malik Scott really can add any new creases to Deontay Wilder's game. I'd have liked to see him back in a tuneup, but if it's straight into Fury III, so be it. The "new trainer" angle adds a little more intrigue to what, so far, has been a one-sided contest between Fury and Wilder.

Man if y'all heard me rather than read me you'd know at best I can only be half serious. My youse is scottish but my innit is english and I keep a healthy amount of local redneckery and ebonics in that **** too. I'm like colorful with language and ****. I like to mix up tenses and use the wrong conjunctions. Shove words that ain't rightly flow well together what like they do, innit.

Anyway, this thread ain't for you my man. You're not an "I Know" type you're more an "I Think" type. Which is respectable. I don't have an issue with mugs being wrong or assuming some **** that didn't happen was gonna. My beef is with all these **** suckers who reckon they know something, claim some credentials or whatever, and proceed to be not just wrong but way more wrong than level headed folks speaking to what they think **** looks like at the moment. Hell, a very smart man can be wrong, **** can be logical and wrong, that is not my issue at all. Even being an expert and being wrong sometimes or a bit wrong ain't a big deald.

Being an "expert" in a field and being 100% wrong is.

It's a part of a larger pet peeve with the internet. In my lab youse shut the **** up and be soft as kittens because the truth it y'all dunno ****. Get online and now everyone's an expert on everything. In person y'all don't know **** about being on television. Online, only one mother ****er here to watch on Hulu but hey that cred is equal to text on a screen alluding to a claim. In person y'all admit you don't know **** all about chemistry, online you can pop a tab and pull up some **** youse can pretend to know how plastic breaks down in the sea. In person y'all don't remember who was HW champion in 1840. Online y'all can pretend like you know that ****s, and, do, even after I tells youse I can tell by the **** you say you're an ignorant ****. Y'all pretend to be experts so much no actual expert on anything can speak to it and stand out as an expert. I ****ing know, for sure, I am one. And while that may sound like I'm bitching for a platform it's more I'm bitching because there probably is a mother ****er reading this post right now who is a lawyer or some **** but ain't about to waste his time teaching me that real because he's not going to argue with counterfeit ****s. Which leave my ass as ignorant as the counterfeits to begin with.

You right, that **** you said don't make sense, but to be fair to you, what narrative spun for us to read does? Ain't a single ****ing expert actually dropped some expertise that actually ****ing explains this **** probably because mugs won't stfu and listen anyway.



Ain't done **** but swept floors at Burger King, but, online doe. Kiss my ass, folks like that should get called out. Nothing wrong with not having done **** until you want to act like you have. Once you act like you have, to me, you've asked me to come pick on you. "You" being rhetorical not personally you.


If I made a thread about the physics of punching, mother ****ers who know **** all physics would argue, claim they have a reason or credential to, then proceed to tell me some tired ass handed down misinformation that's passed from gen to gen unchecked like somehow I missed that **** while totally ignoring this ain't boxing theory it's ****ing physics and until someone else here proves they have some reason to speak to physics it's stfu and listen to Marche time. Most guys like me don't act a ****ing thing like me and I'm telling you they ain't here because they do see themselves as above clowning around with clown ass mugs.

[that g]

Bob has had good amount of success with this judge so he thought he was going to be able to pull it off. But according to Rafael, the judge wasn't impressed at all of the arguments Fury's side was making and Bob is too smart not to get a feel of that. So he knew for some time that this was going to go in this direction. Amazingly, shortly after the ruling, he announces he has a hold on the Allegiant Stadium on July 24.....A few days after Bruce Trampler, a TR matchmaker/exec tells everyone that Fury has a PPV in July. I just wonder if they had told Fury this before he made the video announcement of the fight with Joshua being a done deal.

yep. all the shenanigans by fury for the past 3 weeks makes sense now. i think fury and his team already knew some time ago that they lost the arbitration. it would explain his "workout" with the mma dude, the partying in vegas, joining billy joe saunders posse during the canelo fight week, e.t.c. they knew at that point the fight wasn't happening.

[DaNeutral.]

A ton of y'all just got your asses shown hard. Been talking like you know all about contracts, never listened to the only mother ****er on this forum to ever sign any kind of television contract, got shown you're 100% ****ing wrong, and look at youse. Look at the ****ing state of youse. Still? You is still gonna front like you know yer ass huh?

And youse others who argue with them. WTF? Dude just got shown his ass all over the damn internet and since he's about a shameless **** who can never admit just being plainly and flatly wrong y'all gonna argue some more? **** man, seems like you need told so I'll do the telling. Ain't **** the "Wilder's got no chance" crowd can say to save their asses and there ain't **** you need to say to bury their asses.

I was going off what Arum, Warren and Fury were saying as they would be more in the loop on this situation than any single person on this forum, to be fair I should of known better as all 3 of them were clearly lying for the most part and all 3 have a big history of lying.

And the majority of the folk on here arguing for the other side seem to be getting their news and views off those sweaty racists on YouTube and they definitely have a history of just making chit up. But I got it wrong and you and them have got it right. There is no denying it now.

And as for the 3rd fight itself I would clearly favour Fury based on the 1st 2 fights but I would never rule Wilder out in a fight against anybody.

[Mmann2e]

Well I'm happy for Wilder he gets to go out and try to prove that he wasn't his best that night. If he loses, he loses but now he gets to go for broke and triumph or die. Forgive the Street fighter alpha references

[miniq]

regardless of who is at fault for what and legal implications etc etc

Doesn't everyone sort of feel like Arum is in on it all?

lol he is a snake.

[REDEEMER]

regardless of who is at fault for what and legal implications etc etc

Doesn't everyone sort of feel like Arum is in on it all?

lol he is a snake.

Not at all,it was just a very weird decision I would look to Finkles connection with Weinstein though the judge appointed.

Not sure the forum actually understand no matter what the decision was it would have no bearing on a August 14th date .

[kushking]

Not at all,it was just a very weird decision I would look to Finkles connection with Weinstein though the judge appointed.

Not sure the forum actually understand no matter what the decision was it would have no bearing on a August 14th date .

The judge was a LBJ appointed commie,no surprise that he threw out all precedent"because covid doe"(I literally said this weeks ago,I knew that judge was going to treat covid like bubonic plague to undermine the laws, precedents,& also remember that the contract was written by Pbc more than Top Rank Because Wilder was the champion,& arbitrators are known for siding with whoever is more likely to pay for their services in the future)

[Marchegiano]

I was going off what Arum, Warren and Fury were saying as they would be more in the loop on this situation than any single person on this forum, to be fair I should of known better as all 3 of them were clearly lying for the most part and all 3 have a big history of lying.

And the majority of the folk on here arguing for the other side seem to be getting their news and views off those sweaty racists on YouTube and they definitely have a history of just making chit up. But I got it wrong and you and them have got it right. There is no denying it now.

And as for the 3rd fight itself I would clearly favour Fury based on the 1st 2 fights but I would never rule Wilder out in a fight against anybody.

Same I said to W1LL really. I'm sorry y'all felt like I was talking about you. Neutral my dude, you never once, that I know of, told anyone you are a lawyer and know from experience how **** will play out or anything similar to it. You just formed an opinion based on the info you had available to you. That ain't nothing really, yer alright in my book.