Shameless legal experts

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Marchegiano
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Aug 2010
    • 12208
    • 1,790
    • 2,307
    • 165,288

    #1

    Shameless legal experts

    A ton of y'all just got your asses shown hard. Been talking like you know all about contracts, never listened to the only mother ****er on this forum to ever sign any kind of television contract, got shown you're 100% ****ing wrong, and look at youse. Look at the ****ing state of youse. Still? You is still gonna front like you know yer ass huh?

    And youse others who argue with them. WTF? Dude just got shown his ass all over the damn internet and since he's about a shameless **** who can never admit just being plainly and flatly wrong y'all gonna argue some more? **** man, seems like you need told so I'll do the telling. Ain't **** the "Wilder's got no chance" crowd can say to save their asses and there ain't **** you need to say to bury their asses.
  • Thuglife Nelo
    Banned
    • Dec 2018
    • 26836
    • 1,299
    • 1,822
    • 654,176

    #2
    But Fury and Wilder both garbage. AJ and Ruiz gotta hold it down for da trill!

    Comment

    • kushking
      Osiris the pssy vampire
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Sep 2013
      • 9520
      • 891
      • 2,019
      • 337,046

      #3
      Originally posted by Marchegiano
      A ton of y'all just got your asses shown hard. Been talking like you know all about contracts, never listened to the only mother ****er on this forum to ever sign any kind of television contract, got shown you're 100% ****ing wrong, and look at youse. Look at the ****ing state of youse. Still? You is still gonna front like you know yer ass huh?

      And youse others who argue with them. WTF? Dude just got shown his ass all over the damn internet and since he's about a shameless **** who can never admit just being plainly and flatly wrong y'all gonna argue some more? **** man, seems like you need told so I'll do the telling. Ain't **** the "Wilder's got no chance" crowd can say to save their asses and there ain't **** you need to say to bury their asses.
      Yawwwn.... wake me when the fight happens & Wilder gets battered.... again. (Wilder should've spent some of that lawyer money on trying to steal away Sugar Hill Steward,thats why he'll get battered again. SHS is putting the HW game on notice,nobody can fck with the heir to the Kronk throne.)

      Comment

      • W1LL
        Celtic Warrior
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2004
        • 11851
        • 845
        • 916
        • 71,119

        #4
        Calm down March. The word "youse" doesn't sit right within your diatribe. The thing that bothers me the most is Fury's side allowing this drama to play out in the media, when deep down, behind-closed doors, they must have known all along something like this would happen. As a Fury fan, it annoys me that he must have taken the advice of someone, and been confident they could wriggle out of a signed and sealed contractual agreement. Just disappointment all around for the Undisputed fight.

        I am, however, interested to see if Malik Scott really can add any new creases to Deontay Wilder's game. I'd have liked to see him back in a tuneup, but if it's straight into Fury III, so be it. The "new trainer" angle adds a little more intrigue to what, so far, has been a one-sided contest between Fury and Wilder.

        Comment

        • Thuglife Nelo
          Banned
          • Dec 2018
          • 26836
          • 1,299
          • 1,822
          • 654,176

          #5
          Originally posted by W1LL
          Calm down March. The word "youse" doesn't sit right within your diatribe. The thing that bothers me the most is Fury's side allowing this drama to play out in the media, when deep down, behind-closed doors, they must have known all along something like this would happen. As a Fury fan, it annoys me that he must have taken the advice of someone, and been confident they could wriggle out of a signed and sealed contractual agreement. Just disappointment all around for the Undisputed fight.

          I am, however, interested to see if Malik Scott really can add any new creases to Deontay Wilder's game. I'd have liked to see him back in a tuneup, but if it's straight into Fury III, so be it. The "new trainer" angle adds a little more intrigue to what, so far, has been a one-sided contest between Fury and Wilder.
          I think Wilder will KO Fury tbh. I have very bad feeling about Gypsy Magic lately. Fury is about to get humbled like in the first fight

          Comment

          • KTFOKING
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jun 2018
            • 14399
            • 1,266
            • 284
            • 344,781

            #6
            Originally posted by W1LL
            Calm down March. The word "youse" doesn't sit right within your diatribe. The thing that bothers me the most is Fury's side allowing this drama to play out in the media, when deep down, behind-closed doors, they must have known all along something like this would happen. As a Fury fan, it annoys me that he must have taken the advice of someone, and been confident they could wriggle out of a signed and sealed contractual agreement. Just disappointment all around for the Undisputed fight.

            I am, however, interested to see if Malik Scott really can add any new creases to Deontay Wilder's game. I'd have liked to see him back in a tuneup, but if it's straight into Fury III, so be it. The "new trainer" angle adds a little more intrigue to what, so far, has been a one-sided contest between Fury and Wilder.
            Bob has had good amount of success with this judge so he thought he was going to be able to pull it off. But according to Rafael, the judge wasn't impressed at all of the arguments Fury's side was making and Bob is too smart not to get a feel of that. So he knew for some time that this was going to go in this direction. Amazingly, shortly after the ruling, he announces he has a hold on the Allegiant Stadium on July 24.....A few days after Bruce Trampler, a TR matchmaker/exec tells everyone that Fury has a PPV in July. I just wonder if they had told Fury this before he made the video announcement of the fight with Joshua being a done deal.

            Comment

            • KingGilgamesh
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Feb 2020
              • 1392
              • 524
              • 106
              • 8,713

              #7
              Originally posted by Thuglife Nelo
              But Fury and Wilder both garbage. AJ and Ruiz gotta hold it down for da trill!
              This is your problem OP, you're listening to people on a forum which is populated by fruitcakes like the one I have replied to.

              Forums are often a bastion of the underperformer. Same way social media and twitter types don't tend to do anything meaningful with their lives. I predicted that arbitration was going to be an issue because its common ****ing sense. Lets even say that the judge was wrong, surely you would have concerns that said case still lingered and that Arum and Fury absolutely refused to speak on it...

              Comment

              • kushking
                Osiris the pssy vampire
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Sep 2013
                • 9520
                • 891
                • 2,019
                • 337,046

                #8
                Originally posted by W1LL
                Calm down March. The word "youse" doesn't sit right within your diatribe. The thing that bothers me the most is Fury's side allowing this drama to play out in the media, when deep down, behind-closed doors, they must have known all along something like this would happen. As a Fury fan, it annoys me that he must have taken the advice of someone, and been confident they could wriggle out of a signed and sealed contractual agreement. Just disappointment all around for the Undisputed fight.

                I am, however, interested to see if Malik Scott really can add any new creases to Deontay Wilder's game. I'd have liked to see him back in a tuneup, but if it's straight into Fury III, so be it. The "new trainer" angle adds a little more intrigue to what, so far, has been a one-sided contest between Fury and Wilder.
                Malik Scott is a bum,wtf will he teach Wilder at age 35?

                Comment

                • Shadoww702
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2015
                  • 41176
                  • 4,546
                  • 2,938
                  • 250,035

                  #9
                  Originally posted by kushking

                  Malik Scott is a bum,wtf will he teach Wilder at age 35?
                  That's why Fury needs to go at Wilder right away with no tuneup with new trainers

                  Comment

                  • Thuglife Nelo
                    Banned
                    • Dec 2018
                    • 26836
                    • 1,299
                    • 1,822
                    • 654,176

                    #10
                    8C732B1F-79EE-4351-8389-AE226E85BB4F28e376c41afa1b56.gifF5DCFCE7-AAB8-4895-AB3F-A69AD808ADCDbd71e77ee8ba09d1.gif

                    Originally posted by kushking

                    Malik Scott is a bum,wtf will he teach Wilder at age 35?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP