Can we be honest about Canelo scorecards

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #1PaperChamp
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2020
    • 1253
    • 186
    • 665
    • 13,642

    #31
    Originally posted by just the facts
    I thought Canelo beat Trout, Lara, Jacobs and I can see him getting the nod in the second ggg fight but there's no fa cking way he won the first ggg fight and there's no fa cking way he won more than 3 rounds vs Floyd.
    I respect the post. Only thing I saw differently is GGG1 was 7-5 for GGG so a draw was acceptable for me. We agree on all the rest.

    Canelo definitely did not win GGG1 though. And he lost wide against Floyd. GGG2 was 7-5 either way or a draw

    Comment

    • Boxing Goat
      The G.O.A.T.
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Aug 2013
      • 13150
      • 557
      • 1,027
      • 128,865

      #32
      Originally posted by ShoulderRoll

      Get back to me when Canelo actually wins a fight he clearly lost.

      Crying about a scorecard from a fight where he got beat. How pathetic is that? Just listen to yourself.
      Lmmfao! WTF do you think we've been talking about junior? Take your casual @ ss on

      Comment

      • ShoulderRoll
        Join The Great Resist
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2009
        • 56334
        • 10,186
        • 5,035
        • 763,445

        #33
        Originally posted by Boxing Goat

        Lmmfao! WTF do you think we've been talking about junior? Take your casual @ ss on
        "Canelo got a favorable scorecard against Floyd, doe."

        "That had ZERO effect on the outcome of the fight. Canelo still lost by unanimous decision. What are you even crying about?"

        "Muh Golovkin, doe.

        Comment

        • Shadoww702
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2015
          • 41176
          • 4,546
          • 2,938
          • 250,035

          #34
          Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr
          Austin Trout fight should be a loss or a draw but it’s hard to blame Canelo for the last four rounds because there was open scoring.

          He should have lost the Lara fight 116-112.

          GGG 1 should have been a 116-112 loss.

          GGG 2 should have been a 115-113 loss.

          Jacobs should have been a draw.

          Kovalev should have been ahead on all three cards.



          See that's BSht excuse blaming open scoring. Trout KNEW he was losing and did JACK SHT about it! No Heart Trout

          *** you tell Ali, Canelo, SRR, any boxer with HEART they losing they ain't gonna just sit tight and say "oh well I tried."

          Get that NOISE sht out of here!


          But hey don't forget about Khan? And that "lucky" punch. Ohh and BOTH Cotto's should have wins over Canelo right???

          You say some DUMB ass sht! I can't tell if your trollin (Like your avatar is) or serious???
          Last edited by Shadoww702; 04-26-2021, 07:55 PM.

          Comment

          • Shadoww702
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2015
            • 41176
            • 4,546
            • 2,938
            • 250,035

            #35
            Originally posted by ShoulderRoll

            "Canelo got a favorable scorecard against Floyd, doe."

            "That had ZERO effect on the outcome of the fight. Canelo still lost by unanimous decision. What are you even crying about?"

            "Muh Golovkin, doe.
            *** The right boxer WON??? And THEY STILL bring up ****** sht...

            Comment

            • Shadoww702
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Sep 2015
              • 41176
              • 4,546
              • 2,938
              • 250,035

              #36
              Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr
              Austin Trout fight should be a loss or a draw but it’s hard to blame Canelo for the last four rounds because there was open scoring.

              He should have lost the Lara fight 116-112.

              GGG 1 should have been a 116-112 loss.

              GGG 2 should have been a 115-113 loss.

              Jacobs should have been a draw.

              Kovalev should have been ahead on all three cards.



              Trout??? Sure he did! You need new glasses or quit doing illegal streams where you can't make out sht. Canelo BAMBI-LEGGED Trout a bunch of times

              8.gif

              1_medium.gif
              Attached Files

              Comment

              • Blond Beast
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2007
                • 2848
                • 318
                • 89
                • 51,333

                #37
                Originally posted by Eff Pandas
                Definitely agree. It's a fun joke & I think there is a Canelo lean, but every name from the biggest to the guy who draws crowds at local club shows gets a lean. I've said "robbery" too *******ly myself at times if I had a guy winning a close fight on my card, but the reality is if it's a close fight there is usually some wiggle room to either guy winning.
                Well said. If anyone deserves stroke it would the guy that’s letting his opponent earn more than he ever has or probably ever will. I’m fine enough with the GGG fight outcomes, even if I feel Canelo got more benefit of the doubt. A win for each would have done be just fine. My brother has rewatched the Lara fight a few times, the more he saw it the more he says Canelo won. In a close fight identical scores rarely agree on the majority of rounds. We’re just happy they had the same score but it shows they saw more differently. It’s not something the sport likes to dwell on. But it’s always irked me. Then again judging a fight is hard and eye witnesses are unreliable.

                Comment

                • Boxing Goat
                  The G.O.A.T.
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Aug 2013
                  • 13150
                  • 557
                  • 1,027
                  • 128,865

                  #38
                  Originally posted by ShoulderRoll

                  "Canelo got a favorable scorecard against Floyd, doe."

                  "That had ZERO effect on the outcome of the fight. Canelo still lost by unanimous decision. What are you even crying about?"

                  "Muh Golovkin, doe.
                  You know what fight he clearly lost. Even casuals know that. Be gone

                  Comment

                  • ShoulderRoll
                    Join The Great Resist
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 56334
                    • 10,186
                    • 5,035
                    • 763,445

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Boxing Goat

                    You know what fight he clearly lost. Even casuals know that. Be gone
                    Canelo didn't get an undeserved victory against Golovkin the first time. It was scored a draw, which is very reasonable given how close that fight was.

                    I just keep slapping you around, don't I? No matter what argument you try to come up with.

                    Comment

                    • Boxing Goat
                      The G.O.A.T.
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Aug 2013
                      • 13150
                      • 557
                      • 1,027
                      • 128,865

                      #40
                      Originally posted by ShoulderRoll

                      Canelo didn't get an undeserved victory against Golovkin the first time. It was scored a draw, which is very reasonable given how close that fight was.

                      I just keep slapping you around, don't I? No matter what argument you try to come up with.
                      Only casuals believe that so stfu casual, biased, idiot

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP