Can we be honest about Canelo scorecards

[ShoulderRoll]

The Canelo scorecard narrative is built around the Floyd scorecard and the 1st GGG scorecard by Byrd.

Canelo definitely lost to Floyd and a Canelo did not WIN the 1st GGG fight...although the draw was fair as was a slim GGG win.

Those are the only bad Canelo scorecards but when youre the face of boxing it goes under a magnifying glass

You're 100% right. That's what this is all about, those two specific scorecards.

Throw in the Erislandy Lara fight which was also super close, with Lara being extremely negative.

That's it.

Much ado about nothing but people want to blow it all out of proportion because it's Canelo.

[Stuntman Mike]

Yeah leave nelo alone

He clearly won and got robbed against mayweather it's that two judges who scored for mayweather you guys should be witch hunting

[Stuntman Mike]

You're 100% right. That's what this is all about, those two specific scorecards.

Throw in the Erislandy Lara fight which was also super close, with Lara being extremely negative.

That's it.

Much ado about nothing but people want to blow it all out of proportion because it's Canelo.

There's way more too it than those fights I already posted you that article last week on canelos pre filled scorecards

[just the facts]

I thought Canelo beat Trout, Lara, Jacobs and I can see him getting the nod in the second ggg fight but there's no fa cking way he won the first ggg fight and there's no fa cking way he won more than 3 rounds vs Floyd.

[garfios]

So there's this narrative that Canelo should have multiple losses and that he always gets favorable scorecards but I don't see that being the case (sans the draw on the Mayweather fight lol).

Canelo had one judge scoring against him on the Lara fight...a fight that he clearly won imo...
Canelo had 2 judges giving him 115-113 scorecards on the Jacobs fight...if he lost one more round that fight would've been a draw
On the GGG fights, one judge scored against him, and on the rematch, a fight he clearly won, a judge scored it a draw
Canelo was beating Kovalev's ass and one judge scored it a draw and the other 2 had him winning by only 2 points

So im not sure where there's this narrative that you can't ever beat Canelo on the scorecards because the only fight he really lost was Mayweather

I stop reading when you wrote, "he clearly won against Lara" obviously you are a fanboy.

[BodyBagz]

200.gif

[BMFCHAMP]

Canelo definitely beat Jacobs

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

Canelo has never been given a gift decision, where he didn't deserve to win and the other guy got outright robbed.

Even the first Golovkin bout was super close and a draw is a completely legitimate result.

The "Canelo scorecards" narrative is bullsh*t. Lazy thinking from people who are just looking for an excuse to hate him.

I agree for the most part except GGG 1 was very dubious. 118-110 is crazy. GGG won that fight 116-112 IMO, I do consider that one a robbery.

I thought he beat Lara clearly and felt GGG 2 legitimately could have went either way. No major issues with those cards, I think a lot of criticism of those results does come from hate like you suggested.

[Boxing Goat]

Canelo still LOST the Mayweather fight as he deserved to. Who cares about a whack scorecard that had no effect on the final result?

He has never gotten a win when he shouldn't have. To this day.

Oh, Idk, fair judging in a sport where a single scorecard can make or break a fighters earning potential?

Spoken like a real casual.

Never mind.

[ShoulderRoll]

Oh, Idk, fair judging in a sport where a single scorecard can make or break a fighters earning potential?

Spoken like a real casual.

Never mind.

Get back to me when Canelo actually wins a fight he clearly lost.

Crying about a scorecard from a fight where he got beat. How pathetic is that? Just listen to yourself.